This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Jan. 16, 2026

California Supreme Court steps in on AI-hallucinated prosecutor brief

In the first case of its kind to reach the Supreme Court, justices directed the 3rd District Court of Appeal to reconsider sanctions over a brief containing fabricated citations in a criminal case.

As artificial intelligence hallucinations increasingly plague court pleadings, the state Supreme Court has agreed to get involved.

The justices on Wednesday ordered an appellate panel to consider sanctions against the Nevada County district attorney for having filed a brief in a habeas case containing fabricated authority allegedly generated by an AI program. 

The unanimous Supreme Court told the 3rd District Court of Appeal panel to vacate its summary denial of a defense...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up