Government may not use evidence obtained through warrantless use of GPS device regardless of whether reasonable expectation of privacy exists.
Related Content
Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court
Cellphone case may signal need for change in constitutional doctrines
Sep. 25, 2017
By Michael J. Raphael
By Michael J. Raphael
U.S. Supreme Court, Criminal, Constitutional Law
4th Amendment should protect cellphone data
Sep. 21, 2017
By Marianna Khoury
By Marianna Khoury
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
The Fourth Amendment pendulum
Sep. 15, 2016
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
SEARCH WARS: Return of the Judiciary
May 17, 2017
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
SEARCH WARS: A New Hope for Definitional Clarity
May 15, 2017
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
Government, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
‘Scraping’ is just automated access, and everyone does it
Mar. 27, 2018
By Jamie Lee Williams
By Jamie Lee Williams
U.S. Supreme Court, Criminal, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit allows DNA testing of arrestees
Feb. 25, 2012
By John Roemer
By John Roemer
U.S. Supreme Court, Criminal, Constitutional Law
Biometrics and Fourth Amendment 'overbreadth'
Mar. 29, 2013
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
Government, Constitutional Law
Facial recognition ban shows legislation can protect privacy, too
Jul. 29, 2019
By Daniel Woislaw
By Daniel Woislaw
U.S. Supreme Court, Criminal, Constitutional Law, California Courts of Appeal
High court hones in on ‘hot pursuit’ of misdemeanor suspects
Oct. 27, 2020
By Gary Schons
By Gary Schons