In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litigation

Ruling by

Lower Court

USDC Central District of California

Lower Court Judge

dissenting Judge(s)

Where class representatives fail to show it is reasonable to assume that all members were exposed to misleading advertisements of defendants, reversal required.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Enewsletter Sign-up

Judge Profile

Oct. 2, 2018

Sandra S. Ikuta

Circuit Judge

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litigation

Ruling by

Lower Court

Lower Court Judge

dissenting Judge(s)

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Appellate Practice, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

An 'Unsettling' Reversal?

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Hyundai settlement parties petition for en banc rehearing

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit grants en banc review of case that could affect national class action settlements

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The real dilemma in Hyundai-Kia

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit sits en banc to settle its own conflicting rulings on class settlements

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Ruling breathes new life into nationwide class actions

Judge Profile

Sandra S. Ikuta