Ruling by
Michelle T. FriedlandLower Court
USDC Eastern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Troy L. NunleyArrangement allowing private plaintiff to represent public on contingency-fee basis does not violate due process where arrangement is not 'meaningfully different' from case finding that qui tam provisions of false claims act do not violate due process.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
