For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Employment Law
Bookmark

Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court

Ruling by

Tani Cantil-Sakauye

Lower Court

Los Angeles County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Michael L. Stern
Suffer or permit to work standard under ‘Martinez v. Combs’ applies to determine whether worker is properly classified as independent contractor or employee.



To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Related Content

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

State high court: in misclassification disputes, assume they are employees

May 1, 2018
By Andy Serbe

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Unanswered questions after employee classification ruling

May 8, 2018
By Gina M. Roccanova

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Employee classification ruling might not apply to truckers

May 9, 2018
By Miles L. Kavaller

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Learning the ABCs

MCLE
May 11, 2018
By Gina M. Roccanova, Michael Rubin

Tax, Labor/Employment, Government

Crowdfunding, employee classification and IRS database... oh my!

May 16, 2018
By Erin Bradrick

Transportation, Labor/Employment, Insurance, California Supreme Court

Safer roads: An unexpected benefit of the independent contractor ruling?

May 16, 2018
By Allen Patatanyan

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

California’s gig economy ERISA aftershock

Jun. 1, 2018
By Jim P. Baker

Tax, Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Will employee classification ruling just lead to even more lawsuits?

Jun. 20, 2018
By Robert W. Wood

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, Alternative Dispute Resolution

County can hire independent contractors who don't meet Dynamex test

Jun. 26, 2018
By Michael H. Leb

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Who’s an employee? The impact of Dynamex

MCLE
Jul. 2, 2018
By Dariush Adli

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Ruling may slow down expanding gig economy

Jul. 18, 2018
By Eric B. Kingsley

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

Ignorance of shifting wage laws is no excuse for violations

Jul. 20, 2018
By Joel O’Malley

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Recent cases could inform upcoming rulings on contract work

Jul. 26, 2018
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment

DOL provides the latest guidance on employee classification

MCLE
Aug. 14, 2018
By Elizabeth Arnold, Chester Hanvey

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Does the high court’s Dynamex decision apply retroactively?

Aug. 27, 2018
By Michael H. Leb

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

Uber accused of misclassification by competitor in novel legal move

Sep. 13, 2018
By Andy Serbe

Law Practice, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice

California law risk, the commute, and the past as prologue

Sep. 14, 2018
By Howard B. Miller

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dynamex ruling detonates a common business model

Sep. 20, 2018
By Kerry Jackson

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dynamex isn't just about Wage Orders

Oct. 18, 2018
By Scott D. Nelson

Labor/Employment, California Courts of Appeal

Appellate court ruling sides with worker who accuses employer of misclassification

Oct. 24, 2018
By Andy Serbe

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit continues to enforce well-crafted arbitration agreements

Nov. 7, 2018
By Brent D. Knight, Cary D. Sullivan, Steven M. Zadravecz

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, California Courts of Appeal

As easy as “ABC,” but not exactly in California

Nov. 26, 2018
By Lara F. Graham, Kevin D. Whittaker

Labor/Employment

Postmates and its couriers to argue arbitration in misclassification lawsuit

Nov. 23, 2018
By Sean Kagan

Labor/Employment

2018 in labor law is a tale of two court systems

Dec. 18, 2018
By Andy Serbe

U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

Dueling proposals signal 2019 will be the year of Dynamex

Dec. 20, 2018
By Benjamin M. Ebbink

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

GrubHub reclassification should be easy as ABC

Jan. 22, 2019
By Gerald L. Sauer

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dealing with Dynamex

Jan. 30, 2019
By Laura P. Worsinger

Government

New governor tackles affordable housing, CEQA and the tech industry in State of the State

Feb. 13, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

Could a 3rd category of worker resolve flexibility versus benefits disputes?

Feb. 28, 2019
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment

NLRB ‘win’ for gig economy might not help California employers

Apr. 1, 2019
By Tiffany Tran

Labor/Employment

Court rejects preeemption argument against Dynamex decision

Apr. 3, 2019
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment, Government

Will California pass legislation addressing the Dynamex ruling?

Apr. 15, 2019
By Benjamin M. Ebbink

Labor/Employment

The secret to workplace compliance: Don't just check the box

May 1, 2019
By Beth A. Schroeder

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit rules Dynamex is retroactive, offers guidance on B prong

May 3, 2019
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

How should companies deal with Dynamex retroactivity?

May 8, 2019
By Jon D. Meer, Coby M. Turner

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Vazquez ‘guidance’ throws future plaintiffs a bone or 2

May 9, 2019
By Tamarah P. Prevost

Labor/Employment

Labor Board writes Uber drivers are contractors under federal law

May 15, 2019
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment, Government

Assembly vote on test to determine an employee could impact gig economy

May 31, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Postmates couriers’ suit claims they’re employees

Jun. 4, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, Government

The next wave of new California employment laws

Jun. 6, 2019
By Robin E. Largent

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Bill to codify Dynamex, like the court ruling itself, is an overreach

Jun. 19, 2019
By Michael H. Leb

Labor/Employment

Uber, Lyft might ask unions to help block contractors law

Jul. 3, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

California is doubling down on the Dynamex ruling across the board

Jul. 5, 2019
By Allegra A. Jones, Brooke B. Tabshouri

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Storms on the horizon after high court’s Dynamex ruling

Jul. 10, 2019
By Alicia C. Anderson, Benjamin J. Kim, Irene Scholl-Tatevosyan

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Are unpaid summer internships still legal?

Jul. 10, 2019
By Andre Y. Bates

Labor/Employment, Government

With compromises, gig worker bill passes key legislative committee

Jul. 11, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment, Government

Buttigieg wants to expand California’s gig worker law nationally

Jul. 30, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Law Practice, Civil Rights

San Francisco law firm helps transgender invidividuals get settlement with Lyft

Aug. 1, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

Dynamex upheaval of the gig economy could take years to sort out

Aug. 19, 2019
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment, Government

Law professors urge state to codify Dynamex test in law

Aug. 29, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

US judge OKs $20M deal between Uber and its drivers

Aug. 30, 2019
By Winston Cho

Labor/Employment, Government

State bill codifying Dynamex survives fiscal committees

Sep. 3, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

Legislature OKs bill to curb ‘gig’ workers; Uber vows to ignore

Sep. 12, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation

Uber faces suit after vow to disobey new gig workers law

Sep. 16, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, Government

As contract work reclassification bill is signed, legal challengers are prepared

Sep. 19, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment, Government, California Supreme Court

AB 5: Time to get Uber it and move on

Sep. 24, 2019
By Ronald L. Zambrano

California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Circuit asks Supreme Court if Dynamex is retroactive

Sep. 25, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, Government

Is Dynamex retroactive? What will the California Supreme Court say?

Oct. 8, 2019
By Chris Micheli

U.S. Supreme Court, Labor/Employment

New Dynamex retroactivity ruling could affect high court

Oct. 11, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

U.S. Supreme Court, Labor/Employment, Constitutional Law, California Supreme Court

NLRA may preempt AB 5 under the Garmon doctrine

Oct. 14, 2019
By Keahn N. Morris, Mark S. Ross

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

Retroactivity of Dynamex and AB 5

Oct. 14, 2019
By Allison M. Scott, Cory L. Webster, Laura P. Worsinger

Labor/Employment

Are golf professionals now ‘employees’ under Assembly Bill 5?

Oct. 28, 2019
By Colin Walshok

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The debate over Dynamex’s retroactivity heads to the California Supreme Court

Oct. 30, 2019
By Jacob M. McIntosh, Felix Shafir

Labor/Employment, Corporate

Gig companies unveil ballot initiative to carve out their workers from new labor law

Oct. 30, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

Worries over AB 5 are overstated because of federal law limits

Nov. 15, 2019
By Bob Blum

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

State high court asked to decide if Dynamex applies retroactively

Nov. 25, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Uber’s new contract language won’t prevent worker suits, experts say

Dec. 3, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Uber's and Lyft's AB 5 Hail Mary: Optics aren't everything

Dec. 4, 2019
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Tax, Labor/Employment, Government

State developments impacting the nonprofit sector

Dec. 5, 2019
By Erin Bradrick

Labor/Employment

Navigating the impacts of AB 5 for public agency employers

Dec. 9, 2019
By Kaylee Feick, T. Oliver Yee

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dynamex echoes Supreme Court principles decided almost 50 years ago

Dec. 10, 2019
By Kevin Ruf

Tax, Securities, Law Practice, Corporate

The top 10 legal issues for startups

MCLE
Dec. 13, 2019
By Roger Royse

Labor/Employment

Uber’s $4.4M EEOC harassment settlement followed by new employee class action

Dec. 19, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

2020 laws all California employers should know

Dec. 23, 2019
By Kate McGuigan, Michael Schlemmer

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The top 5 9th Circuit civil cases of 2019

Dec. 30, 2019
By James Azadian

Labor/Employment, Government

Teamsters seek to stop truckers from pausing independent contractor law

Dec. 30, 2019
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment, Corporate

Hot topic in startup law: employment misclassification

Jan. 7, 2020
By Roger Royse

Labor/Employment

AB 5 hit with collection of challenges from range of industries

Jan. 3, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Anti-AB 5 ballot measure OK’d for signature campaign

Jan. 7, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Truckers don’t have to comply with AB 5, new gig-worker law

Jan. 9, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

The impact of AB 5 on court interpreters in the private sector

Jan. 21, 2020
By Esther M. Hermida

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

State high court will hear another Dynamex case

Jan. 21, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

U.S. Supreme Court, Tax, Government

2019’s top 10 California SALT developments

Jan. 22, 2020
By Eric J. Coffill, Alexandra Louderback

Labor/Employment

Keep on truckin’ (for now): AB 5 may not apply to truckers

Jan. 23, 2020
By Philip McDermott, Annette Mijanovic

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court

Janitorial workers urge state Supreme Court to apply Dynamex retroactively

Jan. 24, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, Government

Proposed legislation takes aim at AB 5

Jan. 29, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

California's relentless effort to expand contractor 'misclassification' laws to joint employment and franchising

Feb. 18, 2020
By Michael J. Lotito, James A. Paretti

Labor/Employment

Key 2020 California employment law compliance challenges

Mar. 6, 2020
By Ann Marie Zaletel

Labor/Employment, Alternative Dispute Resolution

New statutes and decisions impact L&E mediations

Mar. 17, 2020
By Louis M. Marlin

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation

AG, truckers want Southern District case stayed while 9th Circuit weighs in

Mar. 18, 2020
By Jessica Mach

Labor/Employment

AB 5 Referendum: the optics are now even worse

Aug. 10, 2020
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment, Government

Newspaper industry gets relief in bill headed to Senate floor

Aug. 24, 2020
By Jessica Mach

Real Estate, Government

Eviction protection compromise goes up to the wire in Legislature

Sep. 1, 2020
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

Independent contractors and AB 2257: different year, same story

Sep. 3, 2020
By Bruce J. Sarchet

Labor/Employment

Bill that loosened some AB 5 restrictions becomes immediate law

Sep. 8, 2020
By Jessica Mach

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Will AB 5 keep on trucking?

Sep. 14, 2020
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment

Prop 22 strips workers of protections guaranteed by California law

Oct. 7, 2020
By Erika J. Scott

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Neither side wanted to argue Dynamex retroactivity at state high court

Nov. 4, 2020
By Jessica Mach

Labor/Employment, Government

Gig workers still on agenda as Legislature plots 2021

Dec. 15, 2020
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Labor/Employment

AB 2257: The ‘clean up’ bill for California’s landmark worker classification law, AB 5

Jan. 6, 2021

Labor/Employment

Prop 22: App-based drivers are classified as contractors

Jan. 6, 2021

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court

Dynamex is retroactive, state Supreme Court rules

Jan. 15, 2021
By Jessica Mach

Labor/Employment

Fallout over gig worker proposition is only just beginning

Jan. 19, 2021
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment

Proposition 22 and the tenuous path forward for app-based companies

MCLE
Jan. 22, 2021
By Jade Butman, Andrea Chavez

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dynamex’s classification test applies retroactively

MCLE
Jan. 29, 2021
By Felix Shafir

Technology, Civil Litigation

Class of 5,000 Uber drivers OK'd in classification fight

Jan. 27, 2021
By Winston Cho

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit lifts injunction on applying AB to truck drivers

Apr. 29, 2021
By Craig Anderson

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Truck drivers in California will finally have their day in court

May 5, 2021
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Gig worker challenge gets 9th Circuit hearing

Jun. 10, 2021
By Jessica Mach

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit lets truckers appeal contract workers ruling

Jun. 25, 2021
By Jessica Mach

U.S. Supreme Court, Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Truckers ask US Supreme Court to review worker classification

Aug. 12, 2021
By Jessica Mach

California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Appellate cases to watch this fall

Aug. 23, 2021
By Lauren Jacobs, M.C. Sungaila

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal

Rethinking the joint-employer standard

Sep. 22, 2021
By Stephen L. Raucher

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

ABC Test is alive and well in the 9th Circuit

Sep. 24, 2021
By Ronald L. Zambrano

Labor/Employment, Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation

In invalidating Prop 22, court overlooked basic constitutional law

Oct. 13, 2021
By Steven G. Churchwell

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation

Repairing the cracked windshield that is AB 5

Oct. 21, 2021
By Ronald L. Zambrano

U.S. Supreme Court, Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

High court seeks US brief on California trucking labor laws

Nov. 16, 2021
By Craig Anderson

Labor/Employment, Government

Worker advocates shouldn’t compromise, ex-lawmaker tells symposium

Feb. 28, 2022
By Malcolm Maclachlan

Judge Profile

Nov. 25, 2012

Tani Cantil-Sakauye

President & CEO
Public Policy Institute of California

By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.