Preliminary injunction in unregistered trade dress suit proper where exclusive production and advertising of adidas' Stan Smith shoe creates 'secondary meaning' and where rival's shoe was 'unmistakably' similar.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit splits sneaker ruling
May 11, 2018
By Steven Crighton
By Steven Crighton
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
We haven’t heard the last on trade dress precedent
May 18, 2018
By Brian M. Wheeler
By Brian M. Wheeler
Civil Litigation, Intellectual Property, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
A tale of three presumptions in trademark cases
May 29, 2018
By Brian M. Wheeler
By Brian M. Wheeler
