Huff v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Ruling by

Lower Court

Santa Clara County Superior Court

Lower Court Judge

Employee seeking penalties for Labor Code violations under PAGA representative action may pursue penalties for all violations if employee was affected by at least one Labor Code violation.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Enewsletter Sign-up

Judge Profile

Nov. 5, 2014

Adrienne M. Grover

Associate Justice

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Huff v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Ruling by

Lower Court

Lower Court Judge

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Courts of Appeal

After Epic Systems, you can almost hear the vibranium humming

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Courts of Appeal

Ignoring compelling legislative history opens PAGA floodgates

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

Lawson and the outlook of PAGA litigation in the 2020s

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment

PAGA is warping the California Labor Code

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal

Ruling confirms courts can strike unmanageable PAGA claims

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation

Can PAGA claims be dismissed for lack of manageability?

Judge Profile

Adrienne M. Grover