Ruling by
Tani Cantil-SakauyeLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtCommunications configured by social media users to be public fall within Stored Communication Act's 'lawful consent' exception, presumptively allowing social media provider to disclose such communication.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Criminal, California Supreme Court
State high court asks tough questions on social media privacy
May 25, 2018
By Blaise Scemama
By Blaise Scemama
Criminal, California Supreme Court
State high court weighs access to social media posts
Jun. 14, 2018
By Donald M. Falk
By Donald M. Falk
U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law
Legal right to privacy must be updated as technology advances
Jul. 25, 2018
By Nina Marino
By Nina Marino
Criminal, California Supreme Court
After high court ruling, defense bar is already sharpening their subpoenas for digital evidence
Aug. 24, 2020
By Donald E. Landis Jr.
By Donald E. Landis Jr.
Ediscovery
Subpoenas: uncovering evidence from third parties in the digital age
Dec. 1, 2022
By Sara Abdalla, Christopher M. Long
By Sara Abdalla, Christopher M. Long
