Ruling by
Carol CodringtonLower Court
Riverside County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Raquel A. Marquez
A trial court abused its discretion as to the admissability of evidence where a plaintiff in a sexual harassment case had not saved the offensive texts messages allegedly sent by her harasser, and could only testify about her recollection of said evidence.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal
Ruling says exclusion of '#MeToo' evidence is reversible error
Jul. 23, 2018
By Molly M. McKibben
By Molly M. McKibben
California Courts of Appeal, Appellate Practice
The $1.6 million question:When is an out-of-court statement not hearsay?
Jun. 22, 2020
By Sarah Hofstadter
By Sarah Hofstadter
