For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Employment Discrimination
Bookmark

Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l

Ruling by

Frederic Block

Lower Court

USDC Northern District of California

Lower Court Judge

William H. Alsup
'Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court' applies retroactively; thus, district court's order granting summary judgment to defendant was vacated and matter remanded to apply 'ABC test.'



To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Related Content

Labor/Employment, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit rules Dynamex is retroactive, offers guidance on B prong

May 3, 2019
By Andy Serbe

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

How should companies deal with Dynamex retroactivity?

May 8, 2019
By Jon D. Meer, Coby M. Turner

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Vazquez ‘guidance’ throws future plaintiffs a bone or 2

May 9, 2019
By Tamarah P. Prevost

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Bill to codify Dynamex, like the court ruling itself, is an overreach

Jun. 19, 2019
By Michael H. Leb

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

California is doubling down on the Dynamex ruling across the board

Jul. 5, 2019
By Allegra A. Jones, Brooke B. Tabshouri

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Storms on the horizon after high court’s Dynamex ruling

Jul. 10, 2019
By Alicia C. Anderson, Benjamin J. Kim, Irene Scholl-Tatevosyan

California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Circuit asks Supreme Court if Dynamex is retroactive

Sep. 25, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

U.S. Supreme Court, Labor/Employment

New Dynamex retroactivity ruling could affect high court

Oct. 11, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation, Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

State high court asked to decide if Dynamex applies retroactively

Nov. 25, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment

Uber’s new contract language won’t prevent worker suits, experts say

Dec. 3, 2019
By Glenn Jeffers

Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The top 5 9th Circuit civil cases of 2019

Dec. 30, 2019
By James Azadian

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

State high court will hear another Dynamex case

Jan. 21, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court

Janitorial workers urge state Supreme Court to apply Dynamex retroactively

Jan. 24, 2020
By Glenn Jeffers

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

California's relentless effort to expand contractor 'misclassification' laws to joint employment and franchising

Feb. 18, 2020
By Michael J. Lotito, James A. Paretti

Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court

Dynamex’s classification test applies retroactively

MCLE
Jan. 29, 2021
By Felix Shafir
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.