For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law
Bookmark

Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco

Ruling by

Michelle T. Friedland

Lower Court

USDC Northern District of California

Lower Court Judge

Richard Seeborg

dissenting Judge(s)

Carlos T. Bea
District court properly dismissed plaintiffs' takings claim as unripe because plaintiffs did not satisfy finality requirement.



To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails

Related Content

Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

‘Finality’ may be the next key issue in takings litigation

Oct. 22, 2020
By Daniel Quinley

Judge Profile

Jul. 30, 2015

Michelle T. Friedland

Circuit Judge

By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.