Ruling by
Kim M. WardlawLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Edward M. ChenInterests implicated by erroneous denial of government motion to dismiss False Claims Act case in which it has not intervened were insufficiently important to justify immediate appeal.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Government, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
US government bid to dismiss False Claims Act case rejected by circuit panel
Aug. 5, 2020
By Craig Anderson
By Craig Anderson
Government, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Ruling cools overheated debate about dismissing FCA cases
Aug. 17, 2020
By Claire M. Sylvia
By Claire M. Sylvia
