Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
47261-5
|
In re Detention of Davis
State improperly committed defendant as sexually violent predator without evidence of recent overt act. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 10, 2002 | |
B149294
|
In re Jessica G.
Appointment of guardian ad litem for mother who eventually lost parental rights violated due process. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 9, 2002 | |
00-7059
|
U.S. v. Wagoner County Real Estate
Federal forfeiture law pre-empts state homestead law, but court must determine whether forfeiture would be excessive fine in violation of Eighth Amendment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 9, 2002 | |
00-1309
|
Duane v. U.S. Department of Defense
Party was on notice of allegation against him and U.S. Department of Defense did not violate its procedural regulations. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 9, 2002 | |
00CA1528
|
People v. Garner
Court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over ruling of magistrate where ruling was not appealed to district court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 8, 2002 | |
B151325
|
Ventura Unified School District v. Superior Court (Lopez)
Action against public entity must be tried in county where accident occurred and where public entity is located. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
A089052
|
Price v. Dames & Moore
Court is required to grant plaintiff leave to file amended complaint and proper certificate if there is reasonable possibility of curing defect. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
B150877
|
Baramas v. Superior Court (Galasso)
Trial court has authority to order partial retrial to determine issue of malice and punitive damages. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
B147481
|
Consumer Cause Inc. v. Weider Nutrition Int'l Inc.
Insufficient pleading exists where consumer products inducing testosterone production do not qualify as 'exposure' to cancer causing agents under act. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
A090825
|
Nash v. MacDonald
Manifestation of real property defect qualifies as latent defect if cause could not have been discovered by laypersons. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
E028669
|
Stull v. Sparrow
When party doesn't present evidence on issue at trial, issue hasn't been proven so as to merit order granting costs and fees. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
A094248
|
Debro v. Los Angeles Raiders
Plaintiff missed three-year deadline to sue professional football team for improperly taking public money to relocate. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
00SA229
|
Concerning the Application for Water Rights of the Consolidated Mutual Water Co. v. Consolidated Mutual Water Co.
Water Court's consumptive use allocations to company and city are final and nonreviewable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
97-35191
|
Baker v. Hazelwood (Exxon Valdez)
Five billion dollar punitive damage award stemming from Exxon Valdez oil spill is too high. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 7, 2002 | |
27263-6
|
Failes v. Lichten
Plaintiffs are entitled to attorney fees based on clause in real estate purchase agreement. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 3, 2002 | |
00-08921
|
US v. $100,348.00 U.S. Currency
Civil forfeiture of $100,348 may be proper, but further discovery is required to determine if money is connected to illegal activities. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jan. 2, 2002 | |
00-1507
|
Kennedy v. Lubar
Order of remand after determination that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction precludes appellate review. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 28, 2001 | |
00-0219
|
Southwest Soil Remediation Inc. v. City of Tucson
Party that did not appeal refusal to issue building permit did not exhaust administrative remedies with agency of primary jurisdiction. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 28, 2001 | |
00-1332
|
Baker v. Suthers
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 19, 2001 | |
C038640
|
Ritzenthaler v. Fireside Thrift Co.
Because Section 998 compromise agreement doesn't encompass plaintiffs' claim for attorney fees, court doesn't err in awarding fees to plaintiffs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 18, 2001 | |
B139968
|
Mizel v. City of Santa Monica
Evidentiary ruling, denying undisclosed expert to testify, and additional instruction to jury after initial inconsistent verdicts do not warrant reversal. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 18, 2001 | |
E027841
|
ComputerXpress Inc. v. Jackson
Some of computer company's claims against potential business partner are barred as strategic lawsuit against public participation. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 18, 2001 | |
99-56639
|
Orion Tire Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Claims arising from international agreement were improperly dismissed without further inquiry as to whether RICO has extraterritorial application. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 18, 2001 | |
E028566
|
Jackson v. Homeowners Association Monte Vista Estates-East
Settlement agreement, providing that trial court will determine prevailing party in action and amount of attorney fee award, is valid and enforceable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 17, 2001 | |
00-0226
|
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
When successful plaintiff deposes own expert witness and presents that testimony in lieu of in-court testimony, expert's fees are not recoverable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 14, 2001 | |
01-1084
|
Dominion Video Satellite Inc. v. Echostar Satellite Corp.
Court did not abuse discretion in giving notice of hearing or in granting preliminary injunction. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 13, 2001 | |
00-1432
|
Hyler v. Geo-Seis Helicopters Inc.
Summary judgment on wrongful death claim proper when plaintiff fails to show defendants owed duty to deceased. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 13, 2001 | |
00-3337
|
Sheldon v. Vermonty
Arbitration panel's dismissal based solely on the pleadings was proper and not excessive use of arbitrator's authority. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 13, 2001 | |
00-55530
|
Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Judicial estoppel precludes claimant who knew of insurance claim yet failed to disclose it during bankruptcy proceeding. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 13, 2001 | |
20157-1
|
Brundridge v. Fluor Hanford Inc.
Arbitration clause in collective bargaining agreement does not bar suit for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Dec. 11, 2001 |