For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Joseph A. v. Ingram
Appellants' claims against state agency under Social Security Act are barred by 11th Amendment and constitutional claims barred by 'Younger' abstention doctrine. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Huffman v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership
On remand, district court doesn't have discretion to award attorney fees when appeals court in previously denied plaintiffs request for fees. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
S.M. v. J.K.
Magistrate judge doesn't abuse discretion in making challenged evidentiary rulings. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Patelo Credit Union v. Sahni
Federal rules aren't violated when no material facts are in dispute and successor judge grants summary judgment as matter of law. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Jinro America Inc. v. Secure Investments Inc.
Jury verdict against foreign company is reversed because of ethnically biased expert testimony. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Kinnell v. Graves
Prisoner who filed more than three actions dismissed as frivolous was properly barred from proceeding in forma pauperis. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Hart v. Massanari
Ninth Circuit rule barring citation of unpublished dispositions is not unconstitutional. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 19, 2001
Rivera v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court doesn't have jurisdiction to review Railroad Retirement Board's dismissal of claim for benefits because dismissal wasn't final decision of the board. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
Ahmed v. State
Federal court lacked jurisdiction to hear First Amendment claim after it was considered and rejected by state appeals board. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
Cuenllas v. VRL International Ltd.
Minute order without title 'notice of entry' does not trigger 60-day time period for filing notice of appeal. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
American Humane Assn. v. Los Angeles Times Communications
Defendant is not required to submit proof of attorney fees at same time it files motion to strike. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
Simmons v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Cross-complaint filed by health care providers accused of insurance fraud violated anti-SLAPP law. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
Katelaris v. County of Orange
Employee declarations about timely mailing of claim rejection satisfies judgment barring suit on statute of limitations grounds. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
Estate of Gilliland
Appeals court can accept stipulated reversal under Code of Civil Procedure so long as it makes the findings listed in statute. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 18, 2001
U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Oliverio
Trial court has jurisdiction to reinstate security interest of foreclosing bank that mistakenly released interest. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 15, 2001
Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools
Plaintiff's factual contentions fail to demonstrate that summary judgment ruling on 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claim in defendant's favor was error. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co.
Defendant who improperly removes lawsuit from state to federal court is liable for attorney fees. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Homans v. City of Albuquerque
Because all requirements for emergency motion for injunction pending appeal are satisfied, defendants are enjoined from further enforcing provision of city charter. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
U.S. v. Horizon West Inc.
Private party may sue for Medicare fraud because prior disclosures had not already revealed underlying allegations. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Sanabria v. Embrey
Dismissal of claim against defendant triggered deadline to request costs, even though claim against another defendant was still pending. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Castillo v. City of Los Angeles
When prerequisites of issue preclusion are met and public policy favors applying preclusion, employee is precluded from relitigating issue of wrongful discharge. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Laborde v. Aronson
Defendant was protected from suit by litigation privilege, and attorney defendant representing self may be awarded sanctions. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Andre v. City of West Sacramento
Plaintiff who won lawsuit is not entitled to attorney fees without showing she actually incurred them. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Levy v. Blum
Trial court correctly awarded sanctions for frivolous litigation tactics under one of two possible statutes. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 13, 2001
Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCort
Statute of limitations did not expire for malpractice lawsuit when it appeared law firm continuously represented client. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 12, 2001
Kravitz v. Superior Court (Milner)
Pro se litigant can not recover attorney fees through discovery sanctions, but may recover reasonable expenses. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 12, 2001
Payne v. National Collection Systems Inc.
Plaintiffs may sue for restitution because res judicata principles do not apply to prior unfair competition lawsuit brought by prosecutor. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 12, 2001
Walker v. City of Lakewood
Retaliation claim against city by independent fair-housing counseling program is actionable under Fair Housing Act. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 12, 2001
Shannon-Vail Five Inc. v. Bunch
Federal court properly applied Nevada law, rather than law of California, to claims of usurious interest rates and conversion. 		Civil Procedure Nov. 11, 2001
People v. Smith
Order 		Civil Procedure Nov. 8, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.