This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
City of Seattle v. Keene
Statutory writ is proper only when no adequate legal remedy exists, when inferior tribunal has acted illegally or exceeded jurisdiction.
Civil Procedure Nov. 1, 2001
Snohomish County v. State of Washington Shorelines Hearings Board
Shorelines Hearing Board didn't err in ruling that service of process on county's planning department complied with requirement to serve local government.
Civil Procedure Nov. 1, 2001
Bank of America v. Miller
Absent a showing of fraud, undue influence or disparate bargaining power, forum selection clause in commercial lease remains enforceable.
Civil Procedure Nov. 1, 2001
Landberg v. Carlson
"Tardy offer" of oral testimony at summary judgment hearing was properly denied.
Civil Procedure Nov. 1, 2001
United Services Automobile Assn. v. Superior Court (Moore)
Court errs in approving sliding-scale settlement when, among other things, value assigned to loan isn't substantiated by evidence or any analysis.
Civil Procedure Oct. 31, 2001
Lee v. American National Insurance Co.
Federal lawsuit does not need to be returned to state court despite lack of jurisdiction over one of multiple defendants.
Civil Procedure Oct. 30, 2001
Seven Words LLC v. Network Solutions
Case is moot when injunctive or declaratory relief is no longer available and there was no timely claim for damages.
Civil Procedure Oct. 30, 2001
Leetsch v. Freedman
Legal dispute properly dismissed from U.S. court because case could be resolved adequately in Germany.
Civil Procedure Oct. 30, 2001
Waks v. Empire Blue Cross/ Blue Shield
State law claims arising from individual insurance policy, converted from group policy, are not pre-empted under ERISA.
Civil Procedure Oct. 30, 2001
Gallagher v. Ingram
Court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear cases appealed from county courts to district courts.
Civil Procedure Oct. 23, 2001
Schuman v. Dept. of Licensing
Department of Licensing improperly analyzed collateral estoppel element when affirming revocation of driver's license.
Civil Procedure Oct. 21, 2001
Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.
Awarding sanctions after second failed attempt to remove class action to federal court was not proper because arguments were not frivolous.
Civil Procedure Oct. 19, 2001
Lam v. Ngo
Among other things, denying anti-SLAPP suit motion based on prior granting of preliminary injunction and untimeliness was error.
Civil Procedure Oct. 19, 2001
Guminski v. The Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining Board
Court correctly dismisses complaint for judicial review of administrative decision as untimely.
Civil Procedure Oct. 17, 2001
Nicolopulos v. City of Lawndale
Ousted elected official's exclusive remedy to reclaim position is quo warranto.
Civil Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
Gamet v. Blanchard
Judgment of dismissal was abuse of discretion after finding party lacked notice and opportunity.
Civil Procedure Oct. 15, 2001
City of Seattle Executive Service Dept. v. Visio Corp.
Collateral estoppel precludes Business and Occupation tax assessment against software company.
Civil Procedure Oct. 14, 2001
Account Management Assoc. v. Sanglimsuwan
Foreclosure cannot be enforced against defendant who did not sign stipulation for judgment.
Civil Procedure Oct. 9, 2001
Mackall v. Jalisco International, Inc.
Prevailing party entitled to award of costs even though all but one claim was resolved in favor of other party.
Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2001
Tripp v. Borchard
Judge which presided over settlement conference disqualified from presiding over subsequent legal malpractice case involving same case.
Civil Procedure Oct. 2, 2001
Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. The Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Cost bond not required in appeal of decision of administrative agency ruling.
Civil Procedure Oct. 1, 2001
Guillen v. Pierce County
Police collision and accident reports are discoverable because they weren't compiled for sole purpose of identifying and improving hazardous roadway.
Civil Procedure Sep. 24, 2001
Shoop v. Kittitas County
Statutory amendment permits person who originally filed lawsuit in incorrect county to re-file.
Civil Procedure Sep. 24, 2001
Ticknor v. Choice Hotels International Inc.
Federal Arbitration Act doesn't pre-empt arbitration clause in franchise agreement when clause is unenforceable as unconscionable under Montana law.
Civil Procedure Sep. 23, 2001
Paine v. City of Lompoc
Court's generalizations that evidence supported going forward to trial against witness defendants wasn't supported by record.
Civil Procedure Sep. 23, 2001
Reed v. Superior Court (Case Financial Inc.)
Motion to disqualify attorney that is still pending does not automatically require stay of all trial matters.
Civil Procedure Sep. 20, 2001
Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water District
Claim for refund of excessive fees charged by utility company is not barred by the statute of limitations under Government Code Section 66022.
Civil Procedure Sep. 19, 2001
Sommatino v. United States
District court doesn't have jurisdiction to consider Title VII claim when employee fails to file EEOC administrative complaint first.
Civil Procedure Sep. 18, 2001
Western Surety Co. v. Bank of Southern Oregon
Summary judgment is proper where party failed to provide evidence of representation or falsity to support fraud claim.
Civil Procedure Sep. 17, 2001
Demontiney v. United States
Neither United States nor Indian tribe waives its sovereign immunity in contract dispute with engineer over construction project on tribal land.
Civil Procedure Sep. 17, 2001