| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
08-56314
|
Allied Orthopedic Appliances Inc. v. Tyco Health Care Group LP
Company does not violate Sherman Act by using marketing agreements to give discounts to buyers in exchange for commitment to buy products. |
Antitrust |
|
Jan. 7, 2010 | |
|
07-16151
|
Coalition for ICANN Transparency Inc. v. VeriSign Inc.
Antitrust claim is sufficiently stated where contract between organizations included automatic renewal provision with 'illusory' re-bid possibility. |
Antitrust |
|
Jun. 8, 2009 | |
|
06-56059
|
William O. Gilley Enterprises Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Plaintiffs' claim alleging bilateral exchange agreements have anticompetitive effects is not precluded. |
Antitrust |
|
Apr. 6, 2009 | |
|
07-512
|
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications Inc.
Price-squeeze claim not valid under Sherman Act, Section 2 when defendant did not have antitrust duty to deal at wholesale. |
Antitrust |
|
Feb. 26, 2009 | |
|
06-55687
|
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
'Noerr-Pennington' doctrine does not immunize company where failure to disclose information to Patent and Trademark Office was not inadvertent. |
Antitrust |
|
Jan. 13, 2009 | |
|
F053553
|
UAS Management Inc. v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital
Tying sales of outpatient services with inpatient services over which hospital had monopoly in geographic market violated Cartwright Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jan. 13, 2009 | |
|
F053553
|
UAS Management Inc. v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital
Tying sales of outpatient services with inpatient services over which hospital had monopoly in geographic market violated Cartwright Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Dec. 19, 2008 | |
|
06-75388
|
Fones4All Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Competitive local exchange carrier must exhaust administrative remedies before challenging denial of its petition for forbearance from FCC regulation. |
Antitrust |
|
Dec. 17, 2008 | |
|
06-16230
|
Theme Promotions Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI
Right of first refusal agreements between publisher of coupon inserts and packaged goods companies violate California antitrust law. |
Antitrust |
|
Oct. 13, 2008 | |
|
06-15636
|
Centerprise International v. Micron Technology Inc.
In antitrust case, plaintiff fails to show that higher U.S. prices for computer memory chip proximately caused its foreign injury. |
Antitrust |
|
Oct. 10, 2008 | |
|
A116798
|
Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc.
Pharmacies who 'pass-on' claimed overcharges to customers are not injured by price-fixing. |
Antitrust |
|
Aug. 20, 2008 | |
|
06-16230
|
Theme Promotions Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI
Right of first refusal agreements between publisher of coupon inserts and packaged goods companies violate California antitrust law. |
Antitrust |
|
Aug. 20, 2008 | |
|
06-15636
|
Centerprise International v. Micron Technology Inc.
In antitrust case, plaintiff fails to show that higher U.S. prices for computer memory chip proximately caused its foreign injury. |
Antitrust |
|
Aug. 14, 2008 | |
|
A116798
|
Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc.
Pharmacies who 'pass-on' claimed overcharges to customers are not injured by price-fixing. |
Antitrust |
|
Jul. 29, 2008 | |
|
05-17328
|
Gerlinger v. Amazon.com Inc.
In antitrust case, plaintiff lacks Article III standing because he did not show he suffered injury-in-fact. |
Antitrust |
|
May 27, 2008 | |
|
08-55105
|
Delaware Valley Surgical Supply Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff lacks standing to pursue antitrust claim because it is not 'direct purchaser' of defendant's products. |
Antitrust |
|
May 1, 2008 | |
|
06-35538
|
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng
Central warehousing ban, erroneously found to be hybrid restraint, is not preempted by Section 1 of Sherman Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Apr. 2, 2008 | |
|
05-16549
|
Kendall v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Plaintiffs failed to state claim under Section 1 of Sherman Act when they did not detail specific facts of alleged conspiracy. |
Antitrust |
|
Mar. 10, 2008 | |
|
05-35627
|
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
Bundled discounts offered by hospital care provider are not exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of Sherman Act unless they are predatory. |
Antitrust |
|
Feb. 4, 2008 | |
|
06-35538
|
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Maleng
Central warehousing ban, erroneously found to be hybrid restraint, is not preempted by Section 1 of Sherman Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jan. 30, 2008 | |
|
05-55367
|
Wah Chang v. Duke Energy Trading Marketing LLC
Filed rate doctrine bars electricity purchaser's suit against energy companies whose market manipulation resulted in unfair tariffs set by FERC. |
Antitrust |
|
Nov. 20, 2007 | |
|
05-15676
|
Sanders v. Brown
Plaintiff fails to allege that state statutes mandate conduct that in all cases violates federal antitrust law. |
Antitrust |
|
Sep. 26, 2007 | |
|
05-17352
|
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp.
Natural gas supplier's motion for summary judgment is properly denied where wine producer's claims are not necessarily barred by filed rate doctrine. |
Antitrust |
|
Sep. 19, 2007 | |
|
05-56023
|
LinkLine Communications Inc. v. SBC California Inc.
Internet Service Provider, alleging supplier and competitor's pricing scheme creates anticompetitive price squeeze, states potentially valid claim under Sherman Antitrust Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Sep. 11, 2007 | |
|
05-35627
|
Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
Bundled discounts offered by hospital care provider are not exclusionary conduct under Section 2 of Sherman Act unless they are predatory. |
Antitrust |
|
Sep. 5, 2007 | |
|
06-480
|
Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc.
In antitrust case, rule of reason is found to be proper standard for testing vertical price restraints. |
Antitrust |
|
Jun. 28, 2007 | |
|
A112591
|
Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings LLC.
Comcast offer of music services only as part of basic cable tier package is not unfair tying arrangement under Unruh Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jun. 11, 2007 | |
|
A112591
|
Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings LLC.
Comcast offer of music services only as part of basic cable tier package is not unfair tying arrangement under Unruh Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jun. 10, 2007 | |
|
B187172
|
Lori Rubinstein Physical Therapy Inc. v. PTPN Inc.
With passage of Insurance Code Section 10133, Legislature has immunized certain conduct of health insurer and group of providers from antitrust liability. |
Antitrust |
|
Mar. 23, 2007 | |
|
05-381
|
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co.
Because predatory-bidding and predatory-pricing involve unilateral pricing measures in order to achieve supracompetitive profits, similar legal standards apply to both. |
Antitrust |
|
Mar. 14, 2007 |