For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran
Sherman Act does not apply to claim based on adverse effect of price-fixing on foreign market that is independent of adverse effect on domestic market. 		Antitrust Jun. 21, 2004
Snake River Valley Electric Assn. v. PacifiCorp
Amendment to state law provides immunity to utility company facing antitrust lawsuit. 		Antitrust May 10, 2004
U.S. Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd.
Because U.S. Postal Service is part of government, it is not subject to antitrust liability. 		Antitrust Mar. 2, 2004
Flamingo Industries Ltd. v. U.S. Postal Servcies
U.S. Postal Service constitutes 'person' under Lanham Act and is not entitled to sovereign immunity from antitrust claims. 		Antitrust Feb. 26, 2004
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko
Complaint alleging violations of Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not state claim under Section 2 of Sherman Act. 		Antitrust Jan. 21, 2004
Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.
Company forced out of business by joint venture of two competitors adequately alleged antitrust injury. 		Antitrust Oct. 24, 2003
International Healthcare Management v. The Hawaii Coalition for Health
Consortium to negotiate terms of company's provider agreement does not cause antitrust injury in violation of Sherman Act. 		Antitrust Jul. 25, 2003
Bourns Inc. v. Raychem Corp.
Jury instructions on misappropriation claim are harmless error; beginning business does not have standing to assert antitrust action. 		Antitrust Jul. 22, 2003
MetroNet Services Corp. v. US West Communications
Reseller of telephone services has demonstrated triable issues of fact sufficient to proceed on its antitrust claims against telephone company. 		Antitrust Jun. 16, 2003
Paladin Associates Inc. v. Montana Power Co.
There are no violations of antitrust laws where procompetitive justifications plainly outweigh alleged anticompetitive effects. 		Antitrust May 20, 2003
Freeman v. San Diego Association of Realtors
Real estate multiple listing service that charges fixed price to subscribers violates Sherman Act. 		Antitrust Mar. 18, 2003
Lantec Inc. v. Novell Inc.
Plaintiff didn't produce sufficient evidence to support inference of conspiracy to monopolize. 		Antitrust Sep. 22, 2002
Telecor Communications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Pay phone location owners define market where telephone company's anti-competitive behavior took place. 		Antitrust Sep. 16, 2002
Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington plc
Indirect purchaser may bring action to recover damages resulting from alleged price-fixing by manufacturer. 		Antitrust Apr. 2, 2002
Lucas Automotive Engineering Inc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc.
Relevant market, for purposes of Clayton Act violation, does not require claimant to establish sub-market to proceed with action. 		Antitrust Feb. 20, 2002
Cable Arizona Corp. v. Coxcom Inc.
Apartment owner who grants cable company access to units is not required to provide access to competing cable provider. 		Antitrust Nov. 30, 2001
Chavez v. Whirlpool Corp.
Manufacturer that demands minimum resale prices does not commit anti-competitive conduct. 		Antitrust Oct. 29, 2001
Toscano v. Professional Golfers' Assoc.
No direct evidence supported plaintiff's allegations that Professional Golfers' Association violated Sherman Antitrust Act by conspiring to restrain trade. 		Antitrust Oct. 4, 2001
Tanaka v. University of Southern California
Collegiate soccer player's antitrust challenge to intercollegiate athletic association rule fails because of failure to identify relevant market. 		Antitrust Jul. 25, 2001
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Company
Prima facie case of antitrust violation required showing that petroleum companies acted collusively and not independently. 		Antitrust Jul. 12, 2001
Trigen-Oklahoma City Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.
State action doctrine protects company's state regulated electricity sales from federal antitrust liability. 		Antitrust May 16, 2001
Huntsman Chemical Corp. v. Holland Plastics Co.
Order 		Antitrust May 15, 2001
Snake River Valley Electric Assoc. v. Pacificorp
Idaho's Electronic Supplier Stabilization Act is not state-sponsored restraint of competition that is immune from antitrust scrutiny because it fails two-prong test. 		Antitrust Apr. 19, 2001
Image Technical Services Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Monopolist's goal to exclude others from copyrighted work raises rebuttable justification presumption for refusal to deal. 		Antitrust Apr. 18, 2001
County of Toulumne v. Sonora Community Hospital
Hospital's requirement of only granting Board-certified obstetricians privileges to perform Cesarean-section deliveries isn't violation of antitrust laws. 		Antitrust Mar. 14, 2001
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Order 		Antitrust Mar. 6, 2001
Orr v. BHR Inc.
Order 		Antitrust Feb. 27, 2001
Cel-Tech Communications Inc v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.
In order to violate Unfair Practices Act, company must act with the purpose of injuring competitor. 		Antitrust Feb. 14, 2001
Snake River Valley Electric Assn. v. Pacificorp
Idaho's Electronic Supplier Stabilization Act is not state-sponsored restraint of competition that is immune from antitrust scrutiny because it fails two-prong test. 		Antitrust Jan. 3, 2001
Garabet v. Autonomous Technologies Corp.
Plaintiffs who can establish only speculative damages as result of merger do not have standing to bring antitrust claim. 		Antitrust Oct. 18, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.