Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-16994
|
Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
Samsung cannot compel consumer to arbitrate dispute over Samsung Galaxy S4 based on consumer's silence regarding arbitration provision contained in the product box. |
Arbitration |
|
Jan. 19, 2017 | |
14-17472
|
Kum Tat Ltd. v. Linden Ox Pasture LLC
Interlocutory appeal from order denying motion to compel arbitration dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, where motion relies on state law and does not invoke Federal Arbitration Act. |
Arbitration |
|
Jan. 16, 2017 | |
G052410
|
Flores v. Nature’s Best Distribution
Arbitration agreement lacking employer signature, description of included disputes, and definition of applicable arbitration rules is too ambiguous to compel binding arbitration in employment suit. |
Arbitration |
|
Dec. 28, 2016 | |
15-16178
|
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Uber's motion to compel arbitration erroneously denied where district court improperly assumed authority to decide threshold issue of arbitrability despite clear, unmistakable delegation clause. |
Arbitration |
|
Dec. 21, 2016 | |
A145613
|
Condon v. Daland
Per terms of contract, new arbitration should proceed where award exceeds contractually bargained-for threshold. |
Arbitration |
|
Nov. 30, 2016 | |
A145283
|
Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's Inc.
Bloomingdale's cannot compel arbitration of employee's individual PAGA claim where representative action waiver remains unenforceable under 'Iskanian.' |
Arbitration |
|
Nov. 17, 2016 | |
14-56650
|
Move v. Citigroup Global Markets
Equitable tolling available under the Federal Arbitration Act; where party relies on arbitration panelist's egregiously falsified credentials, vacatur is merited. |
Arbitration |
|
Nov. 6, 2016 | |
14-56374
|
Ziober v. BLB Resources Inc.
Servicemember must submit to arbitration of employment dispute, where Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act does not prohibit compelled arbitration of claims arising under its provisions. |
Arbitration |
|
Oct. 16, 2016 | |
14-16405
|
Tompkins v. 23andMe Inc.
Motion to compel arbitration properly granted where none of challenged portions of arbitration provision render arbitration provision unconscionable under California law. |
Arbitration |
|
Oct. 13, 2016 | |
B262097
|
Penilla v. Westmont Corp.
Landowner's motion to compel arbitration properly denied where arbitration provision was significantly unconscionable, both procedurally and substantively. |
Arbitration |
|
Sep. 11, 2016 | |
15-16178
|
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Uber's motion to compel arbitration erroneously denied where district court improperly assumed authority to decide threshold issue of arbitrability despite clear, unmistakable delegation clause. |
Arbitration |
|
Sep. 7, 2016 | |
14-15916
|
In re: TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Email evidence of agreement to arbitration settlement appropriate due to federal privilege as settlement in question addressed both state and federal claims. |
Arbitration |
|
Sep. 1, 2016 | |
B264619
|
Royal Alliance Associates Inc. v. Liebhaber
FINRA arbitration panel's expungement award properly vacated where claimant was denied opportunity to present any evidence against broker's request for expungement. |
Arbitration |
|
Aug. 31, 2016 | |
B268420
|
Esparza v. Sand & Sea Inc.
Signed acknowledgment of receipt and review of employee handbook containing arbitration agreement section does not constitute assent to arbitration agreement. |
Arbitration |
|
Aug. 23, 2016 | |
14-16405
|
Tompkins v. 23andMe Inc.
Motion to compel arbitration properly granted where none of challenged portions of arbitration provision render arbitration provision unconscionable under California law. |
Arbitration |
|
Aug. 23, 2016 | |
S220812
|
Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive Inc.
California Supreme Court declares that the issue of 'who decides' whether arbitration agreement provides for class arbitration is one for arbitrator, not the court. |
Arbitration |
|
Jul. 29, 2016 |