For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Saunders v. Weissburg & Aronson
Although attorney has fiduciary duty to clients to protect client's interests, that duty doesn't extend to co-counsel. 		Attorneys Sep. 6, 1999
Pringle v. Chapelle
Simultaneous fee agreements doesn't automatically establish attorney's failure to obtain clients' consent to dual representation. 		Attorneys Sep. 2, 1999
Argaman v. Ratan
Pro per attorney may recover only costs after successful discovery motion. 		Attorneys Sep. 2, 1999
Saunders v. Weissburg & Aronson
Although attorney has fiduciary duty to clients to protect client's interests, that duty doesn't extend to co-counsel. 		Attorneys Aug. 27, 1999
People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. Speedee Oil Change Systems
Conflict of interest created by 'of counsel' attorney imputed to firm, resulting in firm's disqualification. 		Attorneys Aug. 26, 1999
Jebbia v. State Bar
Amendment to statute, providing summary disbarment for criminal convictions, may not be applied to an attorney who committed the crimes before the amendment. 		Attorneys Aug. 11, 1999
Phillips v. State Bar
Statute providing for automatic inactive enrollment after state bar judge recommends disbarment may not be applied retroactively. 		Attorneys Aug. 11, 1999
Marshak v. Ballesteros
In legal malpractice action, client must show that he would have received better result if attorney had recommended rejection of settlement offer. 		Attorneys Aug. 6, 1999
State Bar v. Kirwan
Hearing judge can consider evidence on remand regarding attorney's moral qualifications for reinstatement to practice. 		Attorneys Aug. 6, 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Federal Insurance Co.
Attorney retained by insurance company to represent insured also has an attorney-client relationship with company for disqualification purposes. 		Attorneys Aug. 4, 1999
Kroll & Kroll v. Paris & Paris
Indemnity may not be sought in a malpractice action from counsel who concurrently, but independently, also represents the client. 		Attorneys Aug. 4, 1999
Blum v. Republic Bank
Scheduling status conference with court clerk does not violate local rule limiting ex parte communication and is not sanctionable. 		Attorneys Aug. 4, 1999
In re FPI/Agretech Securities Litigation
Relative efforts of co-counsel and benefits conferred on class support refusing fee allocation proposal. 		Attorneys Aug. 3, 1999
Murphy v. State Bar
Absent extraordinary circumstances, rehabilitation for suspension relief considers only conduct after last discipline causing suspension. 		Attorneys Aug. 3, 1999
Cal Pak Delivery Inc. v. United Parcel Service Inc. (Khourie)
Attorney is justifiably disqualified after offering to sell out client and seeking millions for personal payment. 		Attorneys Aug. 3, 1999
State of Florida ex rel. Butterworth v. Exxon Corp.
Reasonableness of hours and rates are considered in common fund cases fee awards after lodestar overcompensation. 		Attorneys Jul. 30, 1999
The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct Formal Opinion No. 1999-153
Counsel may represent both close corporation and its president-shareholder in suit brought by only other shareholder, provided informed consent is obtained. 		Attorneys Jul. 29, 1999
Tibor v. Superior Court (McNamara)
In legal malpractice action, criminal defendant must prove both his innocence and his attorney's negligence. 		Attorneys Jul. 27, 1999
Trulis v. Barton
Counsel's intentional disregard of client's instructions for dismissal from suit is reckless and warrants sanctions. 		Attorneys Jul. 27, 1999
Hon v. Marshall
No attorney fees are awarded if parties prevail only due to jurisdictional defect. 		Attorneys Jul. 26, 1999
Sullivan v. State Bar
Suspension for 89 days is excessive in light of attorney's 21 years of blemish-free practice. 		Attorneys Jul. 26, 1999
Kritzer v. State Bar
Attorney's admission of nine acts of serious misconduct constitutes aggravating circumstances warranting disbarment. 		Attorneys Jul. 26, 1999
Respondent X v. State Bar
Unusual circumstances surrounding attorney's willful violation of confidentiality order warrants private reproval. 		Attorneys Jul. 25, 1999
Johnston v. State Bar
60-day period of actual suspension is appropriate for attorney's failure to perform competently. 		Attorneys Jul. 25, 1999
Primus Automotive Financial Services Inc. v. Batarse
Order imposing sanctions must be based on explicit finding attorney's conduct constituted bad faith. 		Attorneys Jul. 16, 1999
Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior Court (Esq Bsuiness, Services, Incorp.)
Lack of California law license defeats New York attorneys' entitlement to fees for California representation. 		Attorneys Jul. 15, 1999
Austin v. Superior Court (Chambers, Noronha & Lowry)
Attorney sued for malpractice cannot cross-complain against former client's current lawyer for indemnity or contribution. 		Attorneys Jul. 7, 1999
Elliott v. State Bar
Restitution and suspension is appropriate discipline for failure to hold client's money in trust. 		Attorneys Jul. 6, 1999
Passante v. McWilliam
Stock promise to attorney is unenforceable since violation of attorney's ethical obligation or unbargained for promise. 		Attorneys Jul. 6, 1999
In re Quantum Health Resources Inc. Securities Litigation
Attorney fees for securities class action suits should be based on individual case risk. 		Attorneys Jun. 30, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.