For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Curley v. Mick
Order 		Civil Procedure Jul. 5, 2000
Galan v. Wolfriver Holding Corp.
Trial court has discretion to determine prevailing party for purposes of collecting attorney's fees under Civil Code Section 1942.4. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Roskind v. Morgan stanley Dean Witter & Co.
Federal law does not pre-empt claims brought under California's Unfair Competition Law. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
Appellate court must apply 'highly deferential standard' in determining whether lower court properly granted new trial. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Pratt v. Gursey, Schneider & Co.
Parties stipulating to arbitration may expressly waive the right to appeal from any judgment. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Johnson v. Superior Court
Sperm donor confidentiality agreement precludes disclosure of donor information in all circumstances contrary to public policy 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Andress v. City of Chandler
Arbitration statute that requires parties to submit to arbitration does not extend time to file notice of claim. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2000
Pope v. JJ Man-Data Inc.
New trial may not be granted if juror shows no dishonesty or bias in voir dire. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2000
Han v. Stanford University
Failure to include citations to record in appellate brief warrants dismissal. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2000
Monegro v. Rosa
Action shouldn't be dismissed under forum non conveniens where there is no impediment to compulsory appearance of defendants in federal court. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2000
City of Greenwood Village v. Petitioners for the Proposed City of Centennial
City has standing to raise challenges to annexation statute amendments. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2000
Polk v. Hergert Land & Cattle Co.
Summary judgment inappropriate when disputed issues of material fact remain. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2000
Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell P.C. (In re Alexander V. Stein)
180 days is outer time limit for party who doesn't receive notice of entry of judgment to seek additional time to appeal. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 23, 2000
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Association Inc. v. Turner
Trial court properly denies corrective relief when complainant has acted arbitrarily and unreasonably. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 21, 2000
Bellevue Manor Associates v. U.S.
A party may seek equitable relief from injunction, even though underlying final judgment is related to contract action. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
Ribbens v. Transport International Pool Inc.
Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, issuance of bond staying judgment pending appeal does not extinguish existing levy on writ of execution. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
Hajek v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co.
Without express consent by all parties to authority of federal magistrate judge, the magistrate judge lacks authority to enter judgment. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
In Re Vizcaino v. U.S. District Court (Microsoft Corp.)
After decision on the merits, court can't redefine class on account of 'unusual circumstances.' 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
In Re Vizcaino v. U.S. District Court (Microsoft Corp.)
After decision on the merits, court can't redefine class on account of 'unusual circumstances.' 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Stump
Amended opinion 		Civil Procedure Jun. 19, 2000
Morris-Smith v. Moulton Niguel Water District
Attorney fees under Clean Water Act may be awarded when district court finds plaintiff's claims were frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 18, 2000
In re Vizcaino v. U.S. District Court (Microsoft Corp.)
After decision on the merits, court can't redefine class on account of 'unusual circumstances.' 		Civil Procedure Jun. 18, 2000
Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media LLC
Ordering trustee to abide turnover order doesn't save settlor-protector of offshore trust from civil contempt when such compliance is prohibited in trust's provisions. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell P.C. (In re Alexander v. Stein)
180 days is outer time limit for party who doesn't receive notice of entry of judgment to seek additional time to appeal. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Bibeau v. Pacific Northwest Research Foundation Inc.
Inmate subjected to radiation experiments doesn't 'discover' his injury by later-enacted legislative apology and offer of payment of medical expenses. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Pavon v. Swift Transportation Co. Inc.
Reasonableness of punitive damages award is measured by its relationship to compensatory damages, not out-of-pocket expenses. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 15, 2000
Fymbo v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
Layman representing class must display competence to represent putative plaintiffs. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Milne v. Hillblom
Federal appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review local law of U.S. territory. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Anderson v. Melwani
If individual successfully moves for dismissal for failure to join indispensable party, he is entitled to attorney fees as 'prevailing party.' 		Civil Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
Kona Enterprises Inc. v. Estate of Bishop
When plaintiff doesn't own stock in a company contemporaneously with bringing suit against it, plaintiff lacks standing to pursue derivative claims. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 14, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.