Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-16077
|
Claiborne v. Blauser
Visibly shackling a criminal defendant during a jury trial is a violation of that defendant's civil rights under Section 1983. Remanded for new trial. |
Civil Rights |
|
R. Paez | Jul. 1, 2019 |
18-35347
|
Karnoski v. Trump
District court's order striking President's motion to dissolve preliminary injunction vacated because new policy was significantly different from prior memorandum in both its creation and its specific provisions. |
Civil Rights |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Jun. 17, 2019 |
17-35559
|
Austin v. University of Oregon
Because plaintiffs' theories of liability were missing sufficient, nonconclusory allegations plausibly linking University's disciplinary action against them to discrimination on basis of sex, district court properly dismissed Title IX claims. |
Civil Rights |
|
M. McKeown | Jun. 5, 2019 |
17-56343
|
Mills v. City of Covina
A conviction or judgment that has been reversed on appeal and vacated lacks preclusive effect and cannot serve as collateral estoppel in a later proceeding. |
Civil Rights |
|
R. Nelson | Apr. 25, 2019 |
A154269
|
In re Palmer
Petitioner successfully utilized techniques set forth in 'In re Lynch' to show serial denials of parole punished him so disproportionately to his individual culpability that it was constitutionally excessive. |
Civil Rights |
|
J. Kline | Apr. 8, 2019 |
17-55761
|
Herrera v. City of Palmdale
Because state nuisance enforcement action brought by City was a civil enforcement proceeding akin to criminal prosecutions, abstention in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 was proper. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. O'Scannlain | Mar. 21, 2019 |
17-16756
|
Jessop v. City of Fresno
The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment do not apply when there is theft by city officers who execute a valid search warrant and have qualified immunity |
Civil Rights |
|
M. Smith | Mar. 21, 2019 |
17-16618
|
Advanced Bldg. & Fabrication v. Ayers
A third-party participating in a search pursuant to a warrant, but not aiding the execution of that warrant's authorized objectives, violates the civil rights of those subjected to the search. |
Civil Rights |
|
J. Nguyen | Mar. 14, 2019 |
18-55367
|
Homeaway.com v. City of Santa Monica
Vacation rental hosting platforms subject to Santa Monica Ordinance 2535 were not entitled to Communications Decency Act immunity, and the First Amendment was not implicated because only nonspeech, nonexpressive conduct was regulated. |
Civil Rights |
|
J. Nguyen | Mar. 14, 2019 |
17-16942
|
Crawford v. A.B. Won Pat Int'l Airport Authority
Guam government's difference in treatment between ancestral landowners whose lands were no longer in use and those whose lands continued to be used passed rational basis scrutiny and served an important purpose. |
Civil Rights |
|
L. Kobayashi | Mar. 4, 2019 |
17-55723
|
NAAAOM v. Charter Communications
42 U.S.C. Section 1981's text permits an exception to the default but-for causation standard by virtue of 'an indication to the contrary in the statute itself.' |
Civil Rights |
|
M. Smith | Feb. 5, 2019 |
17-16980
|
Taylor v. County of Pima
Plaintiff cannot recover damages for wrongful incarceration under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983; although his jury conviction was vacated, plaintiff pled no contest to the same counts, and was resentenced to time served. |
Civil Rights |
|
S. Graber | Jan. 18, 2019 |
17-35405
|
LL Liquor v. State of Montana
Montana did not impair its contractual obligation to liquor store within the meaning of the Contracts Clause because it did not eliminate store's remedy for breach of contract with the state. |
Civil Rights |
|
M. Berzon | Dec. 31, 2018 |
16-16122
|
Sandoval v. City of Santa Rosa
Government's warrantless interference in an individual's possessory interest by impounding a vehicle without justification and done solely for deterrence is an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. |
Civil Rights |
|
P. Watford | Dec. 24, 2018 |
E068432
|
Modification: Arista v. County of Riverside
Trial court erred in finding that a county does not owe a duty of care to a rescue victim when its agent undertakes the responsibility of rescue. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. Miller | Dec. 14, 2018 |
E068432
|
Arista v. County of Riverside
Trial court erred in finding that a county does not owe a duty of care to a rescue victim when its agent undertakes the responsibility of rescue. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. Miller | Nov. 23, 2018 |
17-55167
|
Foster v. Hellawell
Court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to determine interlocutory appeals based on qualified immunity when challenge is based exclusively on a sufficiency of the evidence argument and not a question of law. |
Civil Rights |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Nov. 21, 2018 |
17-55723
|
NAAAOM v. Charter Communications
Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, a plaintiff can prevail by demonstrating that discriminatory intent was a factor in a decision. |
Civil Rights |
|
M. Smith | Nov. 20, 2018 |
15-55478
|
Lee v. City of Los Angeles
Summary judgment properly granted and no genuine dispute of material fact exists when a city's redrawing of council districts is not based predominately on race. |
Civil Rights |
|
J. Nguyen | Nov. 20, 2018 |
16-56657
|
Mann v. County of San Diego
In order for a governmental agency to perform an investigatory medical examination of a child, they must first notify the child's parents and gain their consent or get judicial authorization. |
Civil Rights |
|
G. Curiel | Nov. 1, 2018 |
17-35853
|
Rynearson v. Ferguson
District court properly dismissed a challenge to a state cyberstalking statute, where the state protection proceedings didn't present the exceptional circumstances that warrant abstention. |
Civil Rights |
|
R. Clifton | Sep. 10, 2018 |
16-35431
|
M.S. v. Brown
District court did not err in dismissing a complaint for lack of standing given that 'structural constitutional limits prevent federal courts from ordering government officials to enact a bill that hasn't completed the legislative process.' |
Civil Rights |
|
R. Paez | Sep. 6, 2018 |
16-16661
|
Melendres v. U.S.
Federalism principles do not defeat district court's 'broad discretion to fashion injunctive relief;' court did not abuse discretion in formulating detailed injunction where local authorities deliberately violated the provisions of prior injunctions. |
Civil Rights |
|
J. Wallace | Aug. 1, 2018 |
17-15576
|
Hernandez v. City of San Jose
Qualified immunity properly denied where police officers took 'affirmative action' with 'deliberate indifference' to put political protesters at rally in known danger. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. Nelson | Jul. 30, 2018 |
B279936
|
Brown v. Smith
Trial court properly dismissed plaintiffs' challenge to an amendment to California law that eliminated an exemption from mandatory inoculation requirements for school-aged children, given that precedential case law has existed since 1890 authorizing the state to require it. |
Civil Rights |
|
E. Grimes | Jul. 5, 2018 |
15-15939
|
Patricia Campbell v. Edu-HI
Prima facie showing of Title VII discrimination suit requires adverse action that impacts 'compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,' and some evidence of better treatment tendered to those of different status. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. O'Scannlain | Jun. 12, 2018 |
13-56292
|
Rodriguez v. Cruz
Where prisoners hold subjective and objectively reasonable fear of likely retaliation in response to complaints over beatings delivered by correctional officers, failure to seek administrative remedies does not preclude Section 1983 relief. |
Civil Rights |
|
W. Fletcher | May 31, 2018 |
16-15473
|
Caldwell v. City and County of San Francisco
Genuine issue of fact as to officer's allegedly improperly-arranged 'show-up,' and fabricated statement by suspect where released inmate brings Section 1983 claim. |
Civil Rights |
|
A. Tashima | May 14, 2018 |
15-17558
|
U.S. v. County of Maricopa
County is liable for its sheriff’s racially discriminatory policies where Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 34 U.S.C. Section 12601 authorize policy maker liability. |
Civil Rights |
|
P. Watford | May 8, 2018 |
16-16195
|
Reese v. County of Sacramento
Judgment finding that officer is entitled to qualified immunity on excessive force claim affirmed where court acts within its authority in determining that plaintiff's constitutional right was not clearly established at time of officer's conduct. |
Civil Rights |
|
D. Humetewa | Apr. 24, 2018 |