| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 
 A172063  
 | 
Kahn v. Coinbase Inc.
 Where Coinbase user's request for injunctive relief was not limited to existing account holders but rather sought to protect the general public, agreement to arbitrate was unenforceable.  | 
Consumer Law, Arbitration | 
 | 
A. Tucher | Oct. 27, 2025 | 
| 
 A171046  
 | 
Kashanian v. National Enterprise Systems
 A plaintiff seeking statutory damages under the Collection Notice law and Rosenthal Act has standing by virtue of a debt collector's statutory violations, not the suffering of an actual injury.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
A. Tucher | Oct. 2, 2025 | 
| 
 B329575 
 | 
People v. Adir International LLC 
 Civil Code sections 1805.4 and 1810.4's "no fee" provisions bar all fees not specifically authorized and regulated by the Unruh Retail Installment Sales Act for retail installment purchases.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
M. Stratton | Sep. 11, 2025 | 
| 
 B343637  
 | 
Cruz v. Tapestry
 Grey notice text on off-white checkout page containing other distracting elements was insufficient to alert reasonably prudent internet customers that purchasing website's products would bind them to the terms of use.  | 
Arbitration, Consumer Law | 
 | 
H. Bendix | Aug. 29, 2025 | 
| 
 24-14 
 | 
Popa v. Microsoft Corporation
 Plaintiff lacked Article III standing because the alleged harm she suffered as a result of defendants' tracking of her website activities was not concrete.  | 
Cyber Law, Consumer Law | 
 | 
J. Rakoff | Aug. 27, 2025 | 
| 
 A170383  
 | 
Johnson v. Stoneridge Creek Pleasanton CCRC
 Consumer Legal Remedies Act's fee-recovery provision did not prohibit a continuing care retirement community from funding its defense costs--in a lawsuit brought by a resident--through the monthly fees charged to residents.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
J. Goldman | Aug. 21, 2025 | 
| 
 24-2984 
 | 
Grijalva v. ADP Screening & Selection Services Inc.
 While the fact of plaintiff's ineligibility for a program was an "ongoing" event, excepted from the Fair Credit Reporting Act's 7-year reporting limit, the reasons underlying her ineligibility (a suspended nursing license) were not.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
B. Bade | Aug. 18, 2025 | 
| 
 B334720 
 | 
Kim v. Airstream
 Forum selection clause was enforceable where contract was not tainted by unconscionability and illegal choice of law provision seeking to waive unwaivable rights was severed by the trial court.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
F. Rothschild | Aug. 1, 2025 | 
| 
 23-55190 
 | 
Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
 Because expert's proposed damages method could viably measure damages on a classwide basis, district court did not abuse its discretion in certifying class.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
M. Berzon | Jul. 28, 2025 | 
| 
 G063186  
 | 
Tidrick v. FCA US LLC
 Trial court erroneously calculated Song-Beverly fee award using prevailing attorney rates in plaintiff's county of residence, rather than the rates prevailing in the venue.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
T. Delaney | Jul. 24, 2025 | 
| 
 S279969  
 | 
Ford Motor Warranty Cases 
 Ford Motor Company was not entitled to compel auto-buyers' claims to arbitration by relying on arbitration clauses in the sales contracts between the buyers and seller dealerships.  | 
Arbitration, Consumer Law | 
 | 
C. Corrigan | Jul. 7, 2025 | 
| 
 A169022  
 | 
Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
 Plaintiff who agreed to arbitration as an individual did not bind the state, so he could maintain qui tam action on behalf of the real party in interest, the state.  | 
Arbitration, Consumer Law | 
 | 
J. Humes | Jul. 2, 2025 | 
| 
 23-3300 
 | 
Scheibe v. ProSupps USA LLC
 State-law mislabeling claim was not preempted where the complaint alleged single-sample testing, allowing a court to reasonably infer supplement may have been misbranded under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act's multi-sample testing.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
A. Johnstone | Jun. 24, 2025 | 
| 
 23-1226 
 | 
McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.
 Hobbs Act does not bind district courts in civil enforcement proceedings to an agency's pre-enforcement interpretation of a statute.  | 
Civil Procedure, Consumer Law | 
 | 
B. Kavanaugh | Jun. 23, 2025 | 
| 
 22-16128  
 | 
U.S. v. Zinnel
 Debtor's timely request pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to change venue to district of residence created a mandatory judicial obligation and should have been granted.  | 
Consumer Law, Civil Procedure | 
 | 
A. De Alba | Jun. 10, 2025 | 
| 
 H051407  
 | 
Guracar v. Student Loan Solutions 
 Plaintiff had standing to sue, as the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act, the Private Student Loan Collections Reform Act, and the Rosenthal Act do not require plaintiffs seeking statutory damages to show concrete harm.  | 
Consumer Law, Civil Procedure | 
 | 
D. Bromberg | May 22, 2025 | 
| 
 23-55259 
 | 
Amended Opinion: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Cashcall, Inc.
 Consumer lender failed to argue constitutional right to jury trial violation when it proceeded with a bench trial in the first phase of trial.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
E. Miller | Apr. 25, 2025 | 
| 
 24-2095 
 | 
Godun v. Justanswer LLC
 Because Plaintiffs were not on inquiry notice of the agreement to arbitrate, no contract was formed when Plaintiffs were automatically subscribed and charged monthly for Defendant's web services.  | 
Consumer Law, Arbitration | 
 | 
R. Nelson | Apr. 16, 2025 | 
| 
 23-365 
 | 
Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn
 Using civil RICO's "injured in ... business" requirement, Plaintiff may seek treble damages and sue medical marijuana company based on personal injury of being fired after positive drug test.  | 
Torts, Consumer Law | 
 | 
A. Barrett | Apr. 3, 2025 | 
| 
 23-3882 
 | 
Osheske v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co.
 Selling tickets to in-person movie screenings is not engaging in the rental, sale, or delivery of audiovisual materials within the meaning of the Video Privacy Protection Act.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
M. McKeown | Mar. 28, 2025 | 
| 
 A172271 
 | 
Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Co.
 Defendant Ford Motor, as nonsignatory to financing contract, could not compel arbitration where plaintiff's claims were based on Song-Beverly Act warranties and no inequitable results would occur from denying arbitration.  | 
Arbitration, Consumer Law | 
 | 
D. Chou | Mar. 27, 2025 | 
| 
 A169841  
 | 
Suchard v. Sonoma Academy
 Dismissal was appropriate for class action unfair competition claim against school that purportedly retained teachers with abuse history where named plaintiffs failed to articulate an economic harm.  | 
Education, Consumer Law | 
 | 
A. Tucher | Mar. 25, 2025 | 
| 
 23-15999 
 | 
Chabolla v. ClassPass, Inc.
 User was not bound by terms of use presented on website because she did not unambiguously manifest her assent to the terms on any screen where they were conspicuously presented.  | 
Arbitration, Consumer Law | 
 | 
S. Mendoza | Feb. 28, 2025 | 
| 
 23-15887 
 | 
Six v. IQ Data International, Inc.
 Single letter from debt collector to alleged debtor who was represented by counsel was sufficient for standing to sue under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.  | 
Consumer Law, Civil Procedure | 
 | 
R. Desai | Feb. 25, 2025 | 
| 
 H051485 
 | 
Chai v. Velocity Investments, LLC
 Nothing in the Fair Debt Buying Practices Act conditions a consumer's right to sue for statutory damages on suffering an injury in fact or the availability of actual damages.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
C. Lie | Feb. 18, 2025 | 
| 
 B331450 
 | 
Hardy v. Forest River, Inc. 
 Forum selection clause that waived unwaivable rights under Song-Beverly Act was unconscionable and unenforceable, and the clause could neither be rewritten nor properly severed to save the agreement.  | 
Consumer Law, Civil Procedure | 
 | 
A. Richardson | Feb. 4, 2025 | 
| 
 B320441 
 | 
Martinez v. Sai Long Beach B, Inc.
 Although used-car sales contract contained an attorney fees provision, Song-Beverly Act disallowed defendant from being awarded attorney fees as the prevailing party.  | 
Consumer Law, Contracts | 
 | 
D. Kim | Jan. 30, 2025 | 
| 
 23-55259 
 | 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Cashcall, Inc.
 Consumer lender failed to argue constitutional right to jury trial violation when it proceeded with a bench trial in the first phase of trial.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
E. Miller | Jan. 6, 2025 | 
| 
 B331076 
 | 
Carver v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
 Under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, vehicle manufacturers may condition lemon buybacks on the purchaser's consent to keep the financial terms of the agreement confidential.  | 
Consumer Law | 
 | 
L. Edmon | Dec. 30, 2024 | 
| 
 F086904 
 | 
LVNV Funding v. Rodriguez
 Because the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act allows consumers wrongly sued over a debt to pursue a claim, debt collector's anti-SLAPP motion against mistakenly-identified consumer was improperly granted.  | 
Consumer Law, Anti-SLAPP | 
 | 
M. Snauffer | Nov. 14, 2024 | 
