For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
BTHHM Berkeley, LLC v. Johnston
Despite defendant's claim that he did not intend to be bound, settlement term sheet was enforceable under CCP Section 664.6. 		Contracts 1DCA/4 Apr. 1, 2024
Alameda Health System v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement
Public entity's breach of good faith and fair dealing claim failed because it contractually agreed to funding method used by retirement system. 		Contracts 1DCA/2 Mar. 29, 2024
VFLA Eventco v. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment
Force majeure provision in musician's Virgin Fest LA contract conditioned their right to the $6 million deposit based on their willingness to perform but for COVID-19. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Mar. 8, 2024
Andrade v. Western Riverside Council of Governments
Plaintiff was entitled to attorney's fees under Civil Code Section 1717 because the Property Assessed Clean Energy assessment agreements could not limit the attorney's fee provisions to only foreclosure proceedings. 		Contracts 4DCA/1 Feb. 22, 2024
Tiffany Builders, LLC v. Delrahim
Because parties evidenced intent to contract, trial court erred in determining that document drafted and signed by the parties was not a contract. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Nov. 30, 2023
Castaic Studios v. Wonderland Studios
Because the parties specified that their contract was a license agreement--not a lease--and was to be governed by contract law, the landowner could not pursue an unlawful detainer action. 		Contracts 2DCA/5 Nov. 16, 2023
Park v. NMSI, Inc.
Trial court did not err in granting right to attach orders to plaintiffs against defendant employer because substantial evidence supported the probable validity of plaintiffs' breach of contract claims. 		Contracts 2DCA/7 Oct. 13, 2023
Modification: Piedmont Capital Management, L.L.C. v. McElfish
Lender's breach action was timely as to missed monthly installment payments still within the limitations period and unpaid accelerated future payments because the borrower's duties under the agreement were divisible. 		Contracts 2DCA/2 Sep. 25, 2023
Modification: Piedmont Capital Management, L.L.C. v. McElfish
Lender's breach action was timely as to missed monthly installment payments still within the limitations period and unpaid accelerated future payments because the borrower's duties under the agreement were divisible. 		Contracts 2DCA/2 Sep. 15, 2023
Piedmont Capital Management, L.L.C. v. McElfish
Lender's breach action was timely as to missed monthly installment payments still within the limitations period and unpaid accelerated future payments because the borrower's duties under the agreement were divisible. 		Contracts 2DCA/2 Aug. 25, 2023
Aton Center v. United Healthcare Insurance Co.
Substance abuse treatment center's implied contract claim against insurance companies failed because there was no outward manifestation from the insurer's representatives about the reimbursement rate. 		Contracts 4DCA/1 Jul. 31, 2023
Esplanade Productions v. The Walt Disney Co.
Screenwriter's claim that Disney stole the name Zootopia for its animated movie without compensation was dismissed because there was no evidence that Zootopia's creators ever saw plaintiff's submission materials. 		Contracts 2DCA/7 Jul. 21, 2023
Castelo v. Xceed Financial Credit Union
Separation agreement containing release of claims was not statutorily void where the employee knew of a potential claim at the time of signing and accepted the benefits of the agreement. 		Contracts 2DCA/7 May 19, 2023
West Pueblo Partners, LLC v. Stone Brewing Co., LLC
Stone Brewing could not withhold paying rent for new brewpub under lease's force majeure provision since COVID-19 restrictions did not delay, interrupt, or prevent timely payment. 		Contracts 1DCA/2 May 2, 2023
New York v. New Jersey
New Jersey could unilaterally withdraw from interstate compact that provided for continuing, indefinite performance but was silent on withdrawals. 		Contracts USSC Apr. 19, 2023
Juarez v. Ward
An equitable servitude prevented judgment creditor from obtaining rights to debtor's Oscar award statuette. 		Contracts 2DCA/2 Feb. 28, 2023
SVAP III Poway Crossings, LLC v. Fitness Internat., LLC
Fitness facility's failure closure based on COVID-19 government orders did not relieve it from the obligation to pay rent during the months closed. 		Contracts 4DCA/1 Jan. 24, 2023
Vought Construction Inc. v. Stock
Payor with good faith argument for withholding entire progress payment did not violate statute creating right to withhold up to 150 percent of a disputed amount from a progress payment. 		Contracts 1DCA/4 Oct. 26, 2022
Gormley v. Gonzalez
Liquidated damages provision in settlement agreement was enforceable where the agreement appeared to be the result of bargaining between parties of equal bargaining power. 		Contracts 3DCA Oct. 14, 2022
Honchariw v. FJM Private Mortgage Fund, LLC
Late-payment fee in loan constituted an unlawful penalty pursuant to Civil Code Section 1671 since the interest rate on the late payment was measured against the entire unpaid loan balance. 		Contracts 1DCA/3 Oct. 3, 2022
City of Oakland v. The Oakland Raiders
City of Oakland could not pursue breach action as a third-party beneficiary because allowing it to enforce the NFL's relocation policy was not consistent with the objectives of the policy. 		Contracts 2DCA/7 Sep. 16, 2022
Estate of Jones
Settlement agreement containing condition precedent regarding method of payment that never materialized was still enforceable because it contained an independent, enforceable promise to pay. 		Contracts 1DCA/3 Sep. 6, 2022
Creditors Adjustment Bureau v. Imani
A stipulated judgment, which lessee agreed to accept to settle breach of lease agreement, was the exact amount of damages suffered, not a penalty or liquidated damage provision. 		Contracts 2DCA/6 Aug. 10, 2022
Munoz v. Patel
Plaintiff's complaint alleged facts sufficient to state a viable cause of action for fraud in the execution against defendant. 		Contracts 4DCA/1 Aug. 1, 2022
M & L Financial v. Sotheby's
Sustaining a demurrer to breach of contract claim was error where plaintiff's oral clarification at signing was relevant to interpreting contract terms and supported plaintiff's breach of contract claim. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Jul. 18, 2022
Roley v. Google
Google's communications did not constitute a unilateral offer for one terabyte of Google Drive storage because they neither informed users how they might conclude the bargain nor invited the performance of a specific act. 		Contracts 9th Jul. 15, 2022
Broome v. The Regents of the University of California
Retired employees of University of California were not entitled to pension benefits because the implementation of benefits was conditioned on a specified event, which never occurred during retirees' employment. 		Contracts 1DCA/5 Jun. 29, 2022
JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. Jo-Ann Stores
Commercial leasing agreement's co-tenancy provision was valid and enforceable as a "dual" or "alternative" rent provision rather than an unenforceable penalty. 		Contracts 3DCA Jun. 29, 2022
Filtzer v. Ernest
The parties' Forbearance Agreement was intended to be a full satisfaction of debts owed under their settlement agreement since interpreting the documents otherwise would lead to absurd results. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Jun. 6, 2022
Modification: Filtzer v. Ernest
The parties' Forbearance Agreement was intended to be a full satisfaction of debts owed under their settlement agreement since interpreting the documents otherwise would lead to absurd results. 		Contracts 2DCA/8 Jun. 6, 2022
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.