Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-56986
|
Ginsberg v. Northwest Inc.
Airline Deregulation Act does not preempt contract claim based on doctrine of good faith and fair dealing. |
Contracts |
|
Jul. 16, 2012 | |
G045321
|
Apex LLC v. Sharing World Inc.
Agreement between parties for sale of cottonseed does not lack mutual assent where parties clearly intended to enter into contracts for sale of goods. |
Contracts |
|
Jun. 5, 2012 | |
B228930
|
California Paving & Grading Co. Inc. v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.
Subcontractor's complaint is barred by statute of limitations because subdivision improvement work was work of improvement contracted for by public entity. |
Contracts |
|
May 21, 2012 | |
B235819
|
DMS Services Inc. v. Superior Court (Zurich Services Corp.)
Nonsignatory defendant may not compel arbitration of claims against signatory plaintiff under equitable estoppel because claims were not founded upon agreements containing arbitration provision. |
Contracts |
|
May 15, 2012 | |
A132297
|
Samaniego v. Empire Today
Arbitration provision in employment contracts are unconscionable and unenforceable where plaintiffs were required to sign contracts and not provided translations or copies. |
Contracts |
|
May 8, 2012 | |
A131235
|
Husain v. McDonald’s Corp.
Restaurant chain’s franchise agreement requiring strict adherence with its standards of practice is not personal services contract and is subject to specific enforcement. |
Contracts |
|
May 1, 2012 | |
B234627
|
Toro Enterprises Inc. v. Pavement Recycling Systems Inc.
Subcontractor is entitled to attorney fees where it was prevailing party and subcontract authorized fees to prevailing party 'in any dispute resolution between the parties.' |
Contracts |
|
May 1, 2012 | |
B231634
|
Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group Inc.
Motion to compel arbitration is erroneously granted where valid choice-of-law clause dictated that agreement is governed by Texas law, under which agreement is illusory. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 17, 2012 | |
B230197
|
Epitech Inc. v. Kann
Nonsignatory to arbitration agreement cannot be compelled to arbitrate dispute unless party is third-party beneficiary to agreement. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 16, 2012 | |
B221005
|
G. Voskanian Construction Inc. v. Alhambra Unified School Disitrict
General contractor is entitled to recover for extra work despite lack of written change orders because school district supplied misleading plans. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 29, 2012 | |
A130272
|
Montgomery Sansome LP v. Rezai
Triable issues exist as to whether two business entities are separate in determining application of prohibition against recovery of compensation by unlicensed contractors. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 28, 2012 | |
A126710
|
Walker v. Ticor Title Co. of California
In determining reasonable amount of contractual attorney fees, court may not consider financial impact of award on losing party. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 15, 2012 | |
B230076
|
Jeffrey Kavin Inc. v. Frye
Lessees are not bound to purported exercise of option signed by co-lessee under direction of lessor, and not in manner designated under contract. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 5, 2012 | |
A131025
|
Ajamian v. CantorCO2e LP
Court has authority to determine enforceability of arbitration provision where there was no evidence of intent to delegate enforceability issues to arbitration panel. |
Contracts |
|
Feb. 17, 2012 | |
G044429
|
C9 Ventures v. SVC-West L.P.
Enforceable oral contract for lease of helium-filled tanks is governed by ‘Leases’ portion of California UCC, rather than ‘Sale of Goods’ portion. |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 31, 2012 | |
10-36090
|
CRM Collateral II Inc. v. TriCounty Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon
Applicant in letter of credit transaction is not surety where no secondary obligations are incurred and is thus not entitled surety protections. |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 23, 2012 | |
C065744
|
Wisdom v. AccentCare Inc.
Employer’s binding arbitration agreement is unenforceable where employer presented it as condition of employment and it lacked mutuality of obligation. |
Contracts |
|
Jan. 4, 2012 | |
C062060
|
Portico Management Group LLC v. Harrison
Arbitration judgment against trust is unenforceable because trusts are not valid judgment debtors. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 30, 2011 | |
C064954
|
Gray1 CPB LLC v. Kolokotronis
Summary adjudication in lender’s favor is proper where ‘Continuing Guaranty’ document, which defaulting party signed as guarantor, constitutes valid guaranty. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 30, 2011 | |
B226335
|
Kumar v. Yu
Under Civil Code Section 1717, attorney fees award to plaintiff on defendant's cross-complaint is improper because cross-complaint was based on violations unrelated to contract. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 19, 2011 | |
F061767
|
Cargill Inc. v. Souza
Signatories to contract are entitled to attorney fees incurred in defending against lawsuit filed by third party beneficiary, which would have been entitled to fees had it prevailed. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 12, 2011 | |
C066827
|
Eggers Industries v. Flintco Inc.
Entity, which agrees with prime contractor to furnish custom products in accordance with project, is considered ‘subcontractor,’ even if it subcontracts manufacturing of products. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 6, 2011 | |
F060260
|
Fantozzi Bros. v. San Joaquin Tomato Growers Inc.
Definition of ‘commission merchant’ under Food and Agricultural Code does not apply to owners of product sold on commission. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 1, 2011 | |
B225782
|
Lonely Maiden Productions LLC v. GoldenTree Asset Management LP
Secured lender may foreclose on funds held by payroll company where funds paid by unsecured creditor employers were not held in trust. |
Contracts |
|
Dec. 1, 2011 | |
B228027
|
Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co. LLC
Arbitration provision is unconscionable where it involves surprise due to unequal bargaining power and contains harsh one-sided terms, regardless of validity of class action waiver. |
Contracts |
|
Nov. 25, 2011 | |
H035713
|
Linear Technology Corp. v. Tokyo Electron Ltd.
Motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict is properly denied where jury determined that plaintiff could not prove breach of statutory warranty based on sale of goods involved in prior litigation. |
Contracts |
|
Nov. 23, 2011 | |
S184059
|
Retired Employees Association of Orange County Inc. v. County of Orange
County may be bound by implied contract creating vested right to health benefits for county employees where no legislative prohibition exists. |
Contracts |
|
Nov. 22, 2011 | |
F061183
|
CDF Firefighters v. Maldonado
Voluntary dismissal of separate and distinct contract claim does not bar recovery of attorney fees by defendant on adjudicated contract claim. |
Contracts |
|
Oct. 27, 2011 | |
B228027
|
Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co. LLC
Arbitration provision is unconscionable where it involves surprise due to unequal bargaining power and contains harsh one-sided terms, regardless of validity of class action waiver. |
Contracts |
|
Oct. 25, 2011 | |
B222370
|
Molina v. Board of Administration, California Public Employees’ Retirement System (City of Oxnard)
Settlement funds are not ‘compensation’ to be used for computing employee’s pension where agreement did not grant employee right to characterize proceeds. |
Contracts |
|
Oct. 25, 2011 |