Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
156, Orig.
|
New York v. New Jersey
New Jersey could unilaterally withdraw from interstate compact that provided for continuing, indefinite performance but was silent on withdrawals. |
Contracts |
|
B. Kavanaugh | Apr. 19, 2023 |
B313272
|
Juarez v. Ward
An equitable servitude prevented judgment creditor from obtaining rights to debtor's Oscar award statuette. |
Contracts |
|
E. Lui | Feb. 28, 2023 |
D079903
|
SVAP III Poway Crossings, LLC v. Fitness Internat., LLC
Fitness facility's failure closure based on COVID-19 government orders did not relieve it from the obligation to pay rent during the months closed. |
Contracts |
|
M. Buchanan | Jan. 24, 2023 |
A164823
|
Vought Construction Inc. v. Stock
Payor with good faith argument for withholding entire progress payment did not violate statute creating right to withhold up to 150 percent of a disputed amount from a progress payment. |
Contracts |
|
S. Pollak | Oct. 26, 2022 |
C093201
|
Gormley v. Gonzalez
Liquidated damages provision in settlement agreement was enforceable where the agreement appeared to be the result of bargaining between parties of equal bargaining power. |
Contracts |
|
L. Earl | Oct. 14, 2022 |
A163756
|
Honchariw v. FJM Private Mortgage Fund, LLC
Late-payment fee in loan constituted an unlawful penalty pursuant to Civil Code Section 1671 since the interest rate on the late payment was measured against the entire unpaid loan balance. |
Contracts |
|
I. Petrou | Oct. 3, 2022 |
B313388
|
City of Oakland v. The Oakland Raiders
City of Oakland could not pursue breach action as a third-party beneficiary because allowing it to enforce the NFL's relocation policy was not consistent with the objectives of the policy. |
Contracts |
|
C. Karlan | Sep. 16, 2022 |
A162543
|
Estate of Jones
Settlement agreement containing condition precedent regarding method of payment that never materialized was still enforceable because it contained an independent, enforceable promise to pay. |
Contracts |
|
V. Rodriguez | Sep. 6, 2022 |
B316546
|
Creditors Adjustment Bureau v. Imani
A stipulated judgment, which lessee agreed to accept to settle breach of lease agreement, was the exact amount of damages suffered, not a penalty or liquidated damage provision. |
Contracts |
|
K. Yegan | Aug. 10, 2022 |
D078215
|
Munoz v. Patel
Plaintiff's complaint alleged facts sufficient to state a viable cause of action for fraud in the execution against defendant. |
Contracts |
|
J. McConnell | Aug. 1, 2022 |
B312816
|
M & L Financial v. Sotheby's
Sustaining a demurrer to breach of contract claim was error where plaintiff's oral clarification at signing was relevant to interpreting contract terms and supported plaintiff's breach of contract claim. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Jul. 18, 2022 |
21-15677
|
Roley v. Google
Google's communications did not constitute a unilateral offer for one terabyte of Google Drive storage because they neither informed users how they might conclude the bargain nor invited the performance of a specific act. |
Contracts |
|
A. Tashima | Jul. 15, 2022 |
A160591
|
Broome v. The Regents of the University of California
Retired employees of University of California were not entitled to pension benefits because the implementation of benefits was conditioned on a specified event, which never occurred during retirees' employment. |
Contracts |
|
M. Simons | Jun. 29, 2022 |
C094190
|
JJD-HOV Elk Grove, LLC v. Jo-Ann Stores
Commercial leasing agreement's co-tenancy provision was valid and enforceable as a "dual" or "alternative" rent provision rather than an unenforceable penalty. |
Contracts |
|
L. Earl | Jun. 29, 2022 |
B308484
|
Filtzer v. Ernest
The parties' Forbearance Agreement was intended to be a full satisfaction of debts owed under their settlement agreement since interpreting the documents otherwise would lead to absurd results. |
Contracts |
|
A. Harutunian | Jun. 6, 2022 |
B308484
|
Modification: Filtzer v. Ernest
The parties' Forbearance Agreement was intended to be a full satisfaction of debts owed under their settlement agreement since interpreting the documents otherwise would lead to absurd results. |
Contracts |
|
Jun. 6, 2022 | |
B304144M
|
Modification: San Luis Obispo Local v. Central Coast
The reciprocal attorney's fees provision of the Civil Code does not apply in a contract with a government agency that had no authority to enter into an attorney's fee provision in the first place. |
Contracts |
|
A. Gilbert | Jun. 1, 2022 |
B304644
|
Soleimany v. Narimanzadeh
Plaintiffs were entitled to a 7 percent prejudgment interest rate on a usurious promissory note secured by a deed of trust since that was the default rate under the California Constitution. |
Contracts |
|
T. Willhite | May 19, 2022 |
B304144
|
San Luis Obispo Local v. Central Coast
The reciprocal attorney's fees provision of the Civil Code does not apply in a contract with a government agency that had no authority to enter into an attorney's fee provision in the first place. |
Contracts |
|
A. Gilbert | May 6, 2022 |
A162671
|
Estate of Eskra
Plaintiff was not entitled to rescission of a premartial contract based on her unilateral mistake because she neglected to read the contract or confer with her attorney before signing. |
Contracts |
|
M. Simons | May 5, 2022 |
B307348
|
Fettig v. Hilton Garden Inns Management LLC
Plaintiff could not void a settlement agreement based on a claim that her attorney threatened her to accept the settlement, because defendant did not know about the supposed duress and relied on the settlement in good faith. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | May 5, 2022 |
B303161
|
Modification: Foxcroft Productions, Inc. v. Universal City Studios LLC
The term "photoplay" in a 1971 contract with Universal unambiguously encompassed episodes of hit television series Columbo based on its usage in the contract. |
Contracts |
|
Apr. 28, 2022 | |
B303161
|
Foxcroft Productions, Inc. v. Universal City Studios LLC
The term "photoplay" in a 1971 contract with Universal unambiguously encompassed episodes of hit television series Columbo based on its usage in the contract. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Mar. 31, 2022 |
A159792
|
Pappas v. Chang
Plaintiff was not excused from executing a more comprehensive settlement agreement subsequent to the parties' executed settlement agreement. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Mar. 7, 2022 |
B304144
|
San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission v. Central Coast Development
A public agency was not liable for attorney's fees because the indemnification contract was void. |
Contracts |
|
A. Gilbert | Feb. 4, 2022 |
C086518
|
Dameron Hospital Assn. v. AAA Northern Cal.
An insured could reasonably expect that a medical services provider could collect payments directly from an insurer based on a contract insured signed with the medical provider. |
Contracts |
|
H. Hull | Feb. 3, 2022 |
F080377
|
Panterra GP, Inc. v. Superior Court (Rosedale Bakersfield Retail VI, LLC)
Licensed contractor alleging facts sufficient to support claim for reformation was not barred from relief where entity mistakenly listed as the contractor in written agreement was not a licensed contractor. |
Contracts |
|
C. Poochigian | Feb. 2, 2022 |
A157054
|
Blue Mountain Enterprises, LLC v. Owen
Nonsoliciation covenant was enforceable because the covenantor sold or disposed of his business interests when he consolidated his businesses and received an interest in the consolidated entity. |
Contracts |
|
G. Sanchez | Feb. 1, 2022 |
F083104
|
J&A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Superior Court (Tower Theater Properties)
Where feasible, trial court must interpret lease agreement's right of first refusal provision to make it effective rather than void. |
Contracts |
|
D. Franson | Jan. 21, 2022 |
D078215
|
Modification: Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLC
The trial court erroneously sustained a demurrer to a fraud cause of action because the complaint adequately pleaded fraud in the execution of a lease. |
Contracts |
|
W. Dato | Jan. 21, 2022 |