Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D078215
|
Munoz v. PL Hotel Group, LLC
The trial court erroneously sustained a demurrer to a fraud cause of action because the complaint adequately pleaded fraud in the execution of a lease. |
Contracts |
|
W. Dato | Jan. 5, 2022 |
19-16583
|
Amended Opinion: Bladeroom Group Ltd. v. Emerson Electric
In English contract interpretation, court need not look at how commercially reasonable contract term is if that term is stated in clear and plain language. |
Contracts |
|
S. Murphy | Dec. 22, 2021 |
H046475
|
CSAA Insurance Exchange v. Hodroj
Parties are still bound by agreed-upon material terms even though the parties originally contemplated but failed to realize a formal written agreement. |
Contracts |
|
M. Greenwood | Dec. 3, 2021 |
H046707
|
BMC Promise Way, LLC v. County of San Benito
A successor in interest was liable for payment of a fee that the previous property interest holder had agreed to. |
Contracts |
|
A. Grover | Dec. 3, 2021 |
H044894
|
Award Homes, Inc. v. County of San Benito
A real estate developer was required to pay a city "additional amount" fees as part of its development agreement because the parties intended "developer's obligations" to include the additional amount under tax sharing agreements. |
Contracts |
|
A. Grover | Dec. 3, 2021 |
A159749
|
Elation Systems, Inc. v. Fenn Bridge LLC
Because the finding that defendant breached an NDA was uncontested, the trial court should have awarded nominal damages even if there was no showing of harm to plaintiff. |
Contracts |
|
C. Fujisaki | Nov. 24, 2021 |
A162129
|
George v. eBay, Inc.
eBay sellers failed to show unconscionability because they did not show that they had no other options and the challenged policies had legitimate business purposes. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Nov. 15, 2021 |
A162043
|
California Union Square L.P. v. Saks & Company LLC
Where lease agreement contained several sections regarding attorneys' fees, the section that was specific as to the reason for the dispute governed rather than the general attorneys' fees provision. |
Contracts |
|
I. Petrou | Nov. 2, 2021 |
19-56387
|
Harris v. County of Orange
A district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of a county because plaintiff asserted a vested right for continued insurance benefits that was at odds with the prescribed law of the county. |
Contracts |
|
J. Rawlinson | Oct. 29, 2021 |
B310190
|
Banc of California v. Superior Court (N977CB Holdings, LLC)
Absent a clear arbitration provision, the threshold question of the parties' intent to arbitrate should be resolved by the court and not an arbitrator. |
Contracts |
|
B. Feuer | Sep. 29, 2021 |
A155483
|
Korchemny v. Piterman
Payments for usurious interest demands are instead instantly applied to principal, and that reduction in principal can render later interest usurious. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Sep. 21, 2021 |
19-16583
|
Bladeroom Group Ltd. v. Emerson Electric
In English contract interpretation, court need not look at how commercially reasonable contract term is if that term is stated in clear and plain language. |
Contracts |
|
S. Murphy | Aug. 31, 2021 |
A158168
|
Fisher v. MoneyGram International, Inc.
Arbitration provision was unconscionable because it was hidden on back side of money transfer order form, in tiny 6-point print that was virtually illegible. |
Contracts |
|
J. Streeter | Jul. 29, 2021 |
B303096
|
Huy Fong Foods, Inc. v. Underwood Ranches, LP
Hot sauce manufacturer's concealment of its decision not to renew its long-standing contractual relationship with pepper farmer constituted fraudulent concealment. |
Contracts |
|
A. Gilbert | Jul. 28, 2021 |
B300971
|
Gilkyson v. Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Agreement expressly granted defendant right to exploit mechanical reproduction rights without paying royalties. |
Contracts |
|
D. Perluss | Jul. 22, 2021 |
H044371
|
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corp.
Contract's mandatory language to continue certain conduct, the scope of which was defined by past, voluntary practices, created new legal duties; thus, defendant had binding obligation to continue such conduct. |
Contracts |
|
A. Danner | Jun. 16, 2021 |
B302772
|
RMR Equipment Rental, Inc. v. Residential Fund 1347, LLC
Trial court's damages award should have been from date of breach to date of trial because contract was not terminable at will due to its express duration provision. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Jun. 15, 2021 |
G058909
|
Coral Farms, L.P. v. Mahony
When contract designates third person to certify performance, parties cannot go behind designated third person's decision absent bad faith, fraud, or gross negligence. |
Contracts |
|
E. Moore | May 3, 2021 |
A158118
|
Chen v. Paypal
Trial court properly sustained defendant's demurrer in light of plaintiff's generalized allegations and contradictory arguments for breach and unconscionability. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Mar. 4, 2021 |
B296830
|
Waterwood Enterprises, LLC v. City of Long Beach
Trial court abused its discretion in finding that defendant--who lost the only cause of action in the case-- was the prevailing party. |
Contracts |
|
H. Bendix | Dec. 22, 2020 |
B291940
|
Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. Torres Construction Corp.
Trial court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment because job order contract was an enforceable contract, not just an agreement to negotiate. |
Contracts |
|
M. Stratton | Nov. 19, 2020 |
18-16427
|
Ashker v. Newsom
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation did not violate settlement agreement with prisoners when it limited inmate group's direct physical contact during yard time. |
Contracts |
|
J. Gwin | Aug. 4, 2020 |
A153824
|
Saw v. Avago Technologies Limited
Appellant's breach of contract claim failed under express terms of shareholders agreement governed by Singapore law. |
Contracts |
|
G. Sanchez | Jul. 14, 2020 |
F076417
|
County of Fresno v. Fresno Deputy Sheriff's Assn.
Sheriff's Department properly reassigned deputies based on the County's 'sole and exclusive right' to reassign employees for reasons considered legitimate. |
Contracts |
|
B. Hill | Jul. 2, 2020 |
E071287
|
Modification: Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co.
An insured increases a hazard within its control only if the insured is aware of the hazard or it is reasonably discoverable. |
Contracts |
|
C. Codrington | Jun. 26, 2020 |
E068353
|
Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.
Trial court misapplied law governing equitable subrogation and insurance company satisfied all the elements of equitable subrogation. |
Contracts |
|
M. Slough | Jun. 12, 2020 |
E072663
|
North Murrieta Community, LLC v. City of Murrieta
City had authority to impose generally applicable mitigation fees because plaintiff agreed to modify its rights under vesting tentative map. |
Contracts |
|
M. Raphael | Jun. 10, 2020 |
B291116
|
Rubinstein v. Fakheri
The fact that companies' corporate powers were suspended at time of assignment did not affect assignee's standing to sue. |
Contracts |
|
E. Lui | Jun. 4, 2020 |
G057335
|
Hester v. Public Storage
Null and void clauses were valid because they were not precluded by statutes governing self-storage auction sales and plaintiff was not under duress. |
Contracts |
|
E. Moore | Jun. 1, 2020 |
E071287
|
Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co.
An insured increases a hazard within its control only if the insured is aware of the hazard or it is reasonably discoverable. |
Contracts |
|
C. Codrington | May 28, 2020 |