Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E071287
|
Modification: Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co.
An insured increases a hazard within its control only if the insured is aware of the hazard or it is reasonably discoverable. |
Contracts |
|
C. Codrington | Jun. 26, 2020 |
E068353
|
Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.
Trial court misapplied law governing equitable subrogation and insurance company satisfied all the elements of equitable subrogation. |
Contracts |
|
M. Slough | Jun. 12, 2020 |
E072663
|
North Murrieta Community, LLC v. City of Murrieta
City had authority to impose generally applicable mitigation fees because plaintiff agreed to modify its rights under vesting tentative map. |
Contracts |
|
M. Raphael | Jun. 10, 2020 |
B291116
|
Rubinstein v. Fakheri
The fact that companies' corporate powers were suspended at time of assignment did not affect assignee's standing to sue. |
Contracts |
|
E. Lui | Jun. 4, 2020 |
G057335
|
Hester v. Public Storage
Null and void clauses were valid because they were not precluded by statutes governing self-storage auction sales and plaintiff was not under duress. |
Contracts |
|
E. Moore | Jun. 1, 2020 |
E071287
|
Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Insurance Co.
An insured increases a hazard within its control only if the insured is aware of the hazard or it is reasonably discoverable. |
Contracts |
|
C. Codrington | May 28, 2020 |
18-16105
|
Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal LLC v. City of Oakland
City was in breach of contract because it lacked substantial evidence that proposed coal operations posed substantial health or safety danger. |
Contracts |
|
K. Lee | May 27, 2020 |
B291387
|
Safarian v. Govgassian
Defendants were not parties to plaintiffs' marital agreement and therefore could not rely on Family Code Section 852 to invalidate voidable marital property agreement. |
Contracts |
|
C. Moor | Apr. 23, 2020 |
18-565
|
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.
Plain language of parties' safe-berth clause established a warranty of safety. |
Contracts |
|
S. Sotomayor | Mar. 31, 2020 |
C085867
|
Reeve v. Meleyco
Referral fee agreement between attorneys was unenforceable because the client did not provide written consent. |
Contracts |
|
L. Mauro | Mar. 25, 2020 |
B294091
|
Lange v. Monster Energy Co.
Parties' arbitration agreement was substantively unconscionable and trial could properly held it could not remove unconscionability merely by severing. |
Contracts |
|
V. Chaney | Mar. 16, 2020 |
H044890
|
Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. KLA-Tencor Corp.
Under insurance policy, malicious prosecution coverage involves legal proceedings; thus, objectively reasonable insured could not expect malicious prosecution coverage to extend to 'Walker Process' claims which arise from fraud on PTO. |
Contracts |
|
N. Mihara | Feb. 18, 2020 |
B295667
|
Gamma Eta Chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha v. Helvey
Fraternity's chapter, as a subordinate of fraternity, lacked legal power to disregard instructions from fraternity ordering chapter to arbitrate claim against fraternity's agent. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Feb. 10, 2020 |
F075852
|
Hance v. Super Store Industries
Contracts which violate the canons of professional ethics of attorneys may for that reason be void. |
Contracts |
|
B. Hill | Jan. 27, 2020 |
G056344
|
Kiluk v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Although Song-Beverly Act generally binds only distributors and retail sellers in sale of used goods, defendant/manufacturer stepped into that role by issuing express warranty on sale of used vehicle. |
Contracts |
|
R. Ikola | Dec. 16, 2019 |
B292602
|
Modification: Regency Midland Construction, Inc. v. Legendary Structures, Inc.
The court will look to a contract's purpose when interpreting a provision that is riddled with drafting errors. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 27, 2019 |
B292602
|
Regency Midland Construction, Inc. v. Legendary Structures, Inc.
The court will look to a contract's purpose when interpreting a provision that is riddled with drafting errors. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | Nov. 8, 2019 |
A155030
|
Davis v. TWC Dealer Group, Inc.
Three separate arbitration agreements presented by defendant were unenforceable due to procedural and substantive unconscionability given their contents and the circumstances surrounding their signing. |
Contracts |
|
J. Richman | Nov. 1, 2019 |
C085099
|
Bakersfield College v. California Community College Athletic Assn.
Arbitration agreement contained procedural unconscionability coupled with substantive unconscionability because it lacked mutuality; thus, arbitration agreement was unenforceable. |
Contracts |
|
R. Robie | Nov. 1, 2019 |
G056896
|
Magic Carpet Ride v. Rugger Investment Group
Evidence that defendant deposited lien release into escrow only eight days after it was required to do so raised triable issue of material fact whether defendant substantially performed under contract. |
Contracts |
|
R. Fybel | Oct. 29, 2019 |
D072463
|
Koenig v. Warner Unified School District
Employment termination agreement provision under which health benefits would be paid until plaintiff turned 65 violated Government Code Section 53261, but was severable from the remainder of the agreement. |
Contracts |
|
P. Guerrero | Oct. 15, 2019 |
B287339
|
Gietzen v. Covenant RE Management, Inc.
After foreclosure, limited partner and third party beneficiary general partner lost their rights in lease, including provision limiting liability; thus, judgment was amended to include general partner as judgment debtor. |
Contracts |
|
A. Gilbert | Sep. 25, 2019 |
C082231
|
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Because Unemployment Program Forbearance Plan Notice modified deed of trust and note, the contract documents, as modified, were ambiguous; thus, remand was warranted. |
Contracts |
|
R. Robie | Sep. 3, 2019 |
A152877
|
J.B.B. Investment Partners v. Fair
Trial court did not err in granting motion for summary adjudication of breach of contract claim because defendant's communications demonstrated, as a matter of law, the existence of settlement agreement. |
Contracts |
|
J. Kline | Jul. 3, 2019 |
B282241
|
Sands v. Walnut Gardens Condominium Assn.
Reasonable jurors could have concluded homeowners association breached covenants, conditions, and restrictions by failing to keep property unit in first class condition; thus, trial court erred in granting nonsuit judgment. |
Contracts |
|
J. Wiley | May 15, 2019 |
G055685
|
Oxford Preparatory Academy v. Edlighten Learning Solutions
Trial court erred in denying petition to compel arbitration because subsequent termination agreement did not supersede the arbitration clause in the prior agreement. |
Contracts |
|
R. Ikola | Apr. 24, 2019 |
B278949
|
Brown v. Goldstein
The text of parties' agreement, interpreted with aid of extrinsic evidence submitted, showed that parties intended that performance royalties would be included in revenue-sharing provision; thus, judgment reversed. |
Contracts |
|
L. Zelon | Apr. 18, 2019 |
G053688
|
Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. Vanetik
A contract will be enforced if it is sufficiently definite for the court to ascertain the parties' obligations and to determine if those obligations have been performed or breached. |
Contracts |
|
R. Fybel | Mar. 29, 2019 |
B282541
|
United Farmers Agents Assoc. v. Farmers Group
Plaintiff not entitled to declaratory relief on its claim that defendants' agreements preclude termination based on failure to meet performance standards; defendants had a right to terminate without cause under the agreement. |
Contracts |
|
T. Bigelow | Feb. 25, 2019 |
S238941
|
Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC
Employee should not be viewed as third party beneficiary who may maintain an action against payroll company for alleged breach of contract between the employer and payroll company regarding payment of wages. |
Contracts |
|
T. Cantil-Sakauye | Feb. 8, 2019 |