Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-30202
|
USA V. Leon Seminole
Court may compel a spouse to testify against his or her spouse where testifying spouse is a victim of defendant’s crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Owens | Aug. 1, 2017 |
E064206
|
People v. Arredondo
Convicted sex offender unsuccessful in arguing that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated during his trial by allowing witnesses to testify obscured by computer monitor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Fields | Jul. 31, 2017 |
14-50014
|
U.S. v. Martinez-Lopez
Health and Safety Code Section 11352 divisible, proper to use modified categorical approach to apply sentencing enhancement as to defendant that admitted to selling cocaine during plea. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Tallman | Jul. 31, 2017 |
F071951
|
People v. Casillas
A person who suffers super strike conviction at any time before trial court rules on his or her Proposition 47 reclassification petition is disqualified from reclassification. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Detjen | Jul. 27, 2017 |
A147177
|
In re Palmer
Board of Parole Hearing’s failure to calculate petitioner’s base and adjusted base terms entitles petitioner to new parole hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Richman | Jul. 27, 2017 |
S230906
|
People v. DeLeon
Changes to parole revocation process brought on by Realignment Act does not abrogate need for preliminary hearing required under *Morrissey.* |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Corrigan | Jul. 25, 2017 |
S232114
|
P. v. Estrada
Court may rely on ‘facts underlying previously dismissed counts’ when denying Prop 36 resentencing petitions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Cuèllar | Jul. 25, 2017 |
A148919
|
People v. Bloomfield
Access card forgery is not eligible for Prop 47 relief where ‘access card forgery’ is not included in the ‘clear and unambiguous’ statutory language. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Margulies | Jul. 24, 2017 |
S075725
|
People v. Jones
Where exclusion of hearsay is error harmless beyond reasonable doubt, death penalty conviction upheld. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Jul. 21, 2017 |
D069355
|
People v. Roberts
Answers regarding gang affiliation elicited during arrest intake, prior to 'Miranda' warnings, may not be admitted to substantiate gang affiliation enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
W. Dato | Jul. 20, 2017 |
B268667
|
County of Los Angeles v. Allegheny Casualty Company
A court issuing subsequent extension orders under Penal Code Section 1305 is limited to issuing those orders within 180 days from the initial extension order. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Bigelow | Jul. 20, 2017 |
A147740
|
People v. Webb
Williamson rule inapplicable where violation of Section 530.5 cannot follow from violation of Section 148.9 and Vehicle Code Section 31; penalty assessments inapplicable to non-punitive fees; court must establish finding of defendant’s ability to pay attorney fees. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 14, 2017 | |
A149067
|
People v. Jeffrey G.
Defendant erroneously denied transfer to conditional release program pursuant to ‘Sanchez,’ which substantially limited expert testimony on case-specific hearsay evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
S. Margulies | Jul. 14, 2017 |
C078874
|
People v. Carothers
Inmate’s out-of-state murder conviction is not ineligible for Prop 36 resentencing, where Texas conviction ‘might not have been a murder’ under California law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
A. Hoch | Jul. 13, 2017 |
A147603
|
People v. Turner
Evidence of defendant’s prior arrest properly admitted to impeach his claim that police ‘planted’ loaded firearm and ammunition in his duffel bag. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Humes | Jul. 12, 2017 |
15-50480
|
U.S. v. Chavez-Cuevas
Sixteen-level sentence enhancement against repeat illegal border-crosser upheld where his prior robbery conviction in California constituted categorical crime of violence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Bea | Jul. 11, 2017 |
C083356
|
Menefield v. Board of Parole Hearings
Life inmate unsuccessfully challenges regulation allowing parole board to consider ‘serious misconduct in prison or jail’ in determining suitability for parole. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Robie | Jul. 10, 2017 |
A147412
|
In re Taitano
Under specific circumstances of defendant’s case, Penal Code Section 1368 does not authorize trial court to hold new hearing on defendant’s mental competence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Needham | Jul. 7, 2017 |
15-10354
|
U.S. v. Ochoa
Illegal reentry conviction overturned where underlying removal was based on prior conviction that did not categorically qualify as predicate offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Jul. 7, 2017 |
11-99008
|
Visciotti v. Martel
Regardless of whether petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim are meritorious, Supreme Court's prior decision in case at hand precludes relief. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Berzon | Jul. 7, 2017 |
15-30279
|
U.S. v. Padilla-Diaz
Defendants’ motion to reduce sentences properly denied pursuant to Sentencing Commission’s Policy Statement where policy neither conflicted with Commission’s purpose nor violated equal protection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
W. Fletcher | Jul. 6, 2017 |
14-99006
|
Petrocelli v. Baker
Death sentence reversed in case where admission of psychiatric testimony during penalty phase violated defendant’s constitutional rights under ‘Estelle v. Smith.’ |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
W. Fletcher | Jul. 6, 2017 |
B269608
|
People v. Resendez
Gang enhancement properly imposed where defendant’s own character witnesses provided direct evidence of connection between gang and subsets that ‘Prunty’ required. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
E. Grimes | Jul. 5, 2017 |
14-10224
|
U.S. v. Zapien
Drug offender’s suppression motion properly denied where questioning that followed his invocation of right to counsel fell under booking exception to ‘Miranda.’ |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Jul. 5, 2017 |
S223825
|
People v. Valencia
Proposition 47’s definition of ‘unreasonable risk of danger to public safety’ under Penal Code Section 1170.18(c), does not apply to Three Strikes Reform Act resentencing petitions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
T. Cantil-Sakauye | Jul. 5, 2017 |
14-56159
|
Hall v. Haws
Petitioner convicted of first degree murder successful in reopening his case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(6) and in obtaining habeas relief. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
H. Pregerson | Jul. 5, 2017 |
S228193
|
People v. Hopson
Admission of alleged co-perpetrator’s confession post-death violates defendant’s Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses against her, resulting in reversal and remand. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
L. Kruger | Jul. 5, 2017 |
13-56024
|
Godoy v. Spearman
En banc court grants convicted murderer habeas relief in case involving alleged misconduct of juror who had been texting ‘judge friend’ during trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Fisher | Jul. 3, 2017 |
16-10177
|
U.S. v. Perez-Silvan
Sentence enhancement for illegal entry after deportation conviction upheld where defendant's prior aggravated assault conviction under Tennessee law constitutes crime of violence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. O'Scannlain | Jun. 29, 2017 |
16-10039
|
U.S. v. Calvillo-Palacios
Threat and assault statutes necessarily require violent physical force and are thus properly classified as crimes of violence under U.S.S.G Section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
D. O'Scannlain | Jun. 29, 2017 |