| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
H033605
|
In re Macias
Board of Parole Hearings’ reliance on ‘lack of insight’ to deny parole must be based on factually identifiable deficiency, not speculation of facts. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 9, 2010 | |
|
10-91
|
Wilson v. Corcoran
Federal courts may not issue habeas writ to state prisoner whose custody is not shown to be in violation of federal laws. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
B221639
|
People v. Lexington National Insurance Co.
Forfeiture of bond is proper where prosecutor is unable to extradite defendant from country without extradition treaty. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
08-10167
|
U.S. v. Schafer
District court may not make factual findings if evidence of motion to dismiss is not entirely separable from issue of defendant’s guilt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
C061805
|
People v. Smith
Jury instruction on rape of intoxicated woman charge properly states victim was prevented from resisting where unable to exercise ‘reasonable judgment.’ |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
B222061
|
In re Hare
Decision to deny parole is not arbitrary where supported by defendant’s inclination to hide truth and probative nature of his crime and motive. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
B218891
|
People v. Nordberg
Error in jury instruction for fleeing scene of vehicular manslaughter enhancement is harmless where evidence revealed defendant had requisite knowledge of possible injury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 8, 2010 | |
|
H035329
|
People v. Gabriel
Probation condition requiring defendant not to associate with ‘suspected’ gang members fails to provide adequate notice of expectations, and is unconstitutionally vague. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 7, 2010 | |
|
G043026
|
People v. Seneca Insurance Co.
Bail bond is not exonerated where government has not completed extradition of defendant before end of bond exoneration period. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 7, 2010 | |
|
A124362
|
People v. Johnson
Statements made in 911 call describing ongoing emergency are nontestimonial and do not violate defendant’s right to confront witnesses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 7, 2010 | |
|
S175307
|
People v. Hajjaj
Remoteness of open courtroom, which only became available late on last permissible day to commence defendant’s trial, does not constitute good cause for delay. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 4, 2010 | |
|
05-50507
|
U.S. v. Hantzis
Defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel is valid where he is informed of dangers in self-representation and actively participates in his defense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 4, 2010 | |
|
08-10525
|
U.S. v. Wright
Defendant’s conviction for interstate transport of child pornography is error where, at time of defendant’s conviction, law required files actually cross state lines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 4, 2010 | |
|
D054976
|
People v. Miramontes
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony of prior uncharged lewd acts upon children to show defendant’s propensity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 4, 2010 | |
|
08-10185
|
U.S. v. Lazarenko
Co-conspirator, who was partly victimized, is not entitled to restitution where he willingly participated in, and profited from, criminal enterprise. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 3, 2010 | |
|
H035137
|
Jackson v. Superior Court (People)
Superior court has power to reconsider and vacate order granting habeas relief on motion to reconsider filed within 60-day time period for appeal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 3, 2010 | |
|
05-99006
|
Crittenden v. Ayers
Defendant is not required to prove peremptory strike would have been issued if race had played no role when challenging juror’s dismissal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 2, 2010 | |
|
08-30339
|
U.S. v. George
Failure to register as sex offender does not violate ex post facto clause because federal statute was enacted before date of conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 2, 2010 | |
|
B219424
|
In re McDonald
Governor may not condition petitioner’s parole on admission of guilt, absent any additional indication of current dangerousness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 2, 2010 | |
|
B217438
|
People v. Baldwin
Trial court errs by excluding hearsay evidence of defendant's inconsistent statements on ground that defendant was required to testify. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 2, 2010 | |
|
09-50426
|
U.S. v. Leal-Felix
In calculating defendant’s criminal history, traffic violations resulting in imprisonment are treated as arrests for sentencing purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Nov. 1, 2010 | |
|
04-55831
|
Smith v. Mitchell
Habeas relief must issue where there is no verifiable evidence to support prosecution’s theory that defendant shook baby to death. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 31, 2010 | |
|
10-30247
|
U.S. v. Krane
Although court has jurisdiction over appeal of order directing law firm to comply with subpoena, defendants' guilty pleas render appeal moot. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 31, 2010 | |
|
H033197
|
People v. Long
In peremptory challenge where race is at issue, prosecutor has to prove that non-race based reason given can stand on its own. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 31, 2010 | |
|
S175242
|
In re Jenkins
Actual work participation, rather than mere willingness to work, is required for inmate to receive lower security evaluation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 28, 2010 | |
|
B220315
|
People v. Greenwood
Traffic stop is reasonably based on officers’ objective belief that based on DMV records, vehicle’s registration was expired despite temporary permit. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 28, 2010 | |
|
A124763
|
Smith v. Superior Court (People)
'Sutton' does not alter finding that court violated defendant's statutory right to speedy trial by continuing trial beyond 60-day limit. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 28, 2010 | |
|
07-99013
|
Williams v. Ryan
Court must hold evidentiary hearing for defendant’s claim of 'Brady' violation where evidence discovered after conviction contradicts prosecution’s theory at trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 26, 2010 | |
|
08-16472
|
McNeal v. Adams
Hearing on prosecution's motion to compel DNA sample is not 'critical stage' at which absence of defense counsel requires per se reversal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 26, 2010 | |
|
08-55728
|
Pearson v. Muntz
District court properly determines that state court’s decision approving governor's decision to reject parole was unreasonable application of 'some evidence' test. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 26, 2010 |
