| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S064415
|
People v. Bramit
Commutation instruction provided in response to death penalty jury question about impact of future legislation on sentence is not prejudicial error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2009 | |
|
S069959
|
People v. Lewis
Trial court did not error by admitting photographs of murder victim and scene of crime into evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 17, 2009 | |
|
H032249
|
People v. Miller
Unjustified shackling of defendant during trial is not harmless error where restraints had prejudicial effect on defendant and jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
C059154
|
People v. Hudson
No violation of defendant's constitutional rights where jury instruction allows rejection of witness testimony based on inconsistent out-of-court statements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
D053080
|
People v. Fields
Exclusion of polygraph test questions in sexually violent predator commitment proceeding constitutes harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
D052147
|
People v. Blount
Request to override terms of negotiated plea bargain properly declined where court lacked jurisdiction to impose lower sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
A121195
|
People v. Osborne
Pat-down search warranted where officer observes screwdrivers and pliers near defendant suspected of burglarizing vehicle. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
08-30180
|
U.S. v. Olander
The crime of receiving child pornography does not require intent to distribute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 16, 2009 | |
|
A117853
|
People v. Dillon
Trial court is not required to instruct jury on defendant’s belief that consent existed where victim acted unequivocally. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2009 | |
|
07-10541
|
U.S. v. Young
Motion to suppress gun found in hotel room properly granted where no affirmative actions taken to evict patron. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2009 | |
|
08-30075
|
U.S. v. Overton
Sexual exploitation of minor convictions not double jeopardy violation where one statute required proof of guardian status and other did not. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 15, 2009 | |
|
06-50552
|
U.S. v. Gerritsen
Amateur-radio host having represented himself at least nine previous times cannot argue his waiver of right to counsel was ineffective. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 14, 2009 | |
|
A119501
|
People v. Hernandez
Placement of armed sheriff behind defendant during his testimony violates due process right to fair trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 14, 2009 | |
|
S157820
|
People v. Traylor
Second complaint charging negligent vehicular manslaughter not barred by dismissal of first complaint for vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 14, 2009 | |
|
C057782
|
People v. Stuckey
Defendant's right to appointment of defense experts is only available at trial and does not extend to sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 13, 2009 | |
|
07-15087
|
Ramirez v. Yates
Limitations period for filing federal habeas petition may be tolled where prisoner lacked knowledge of decision and access to legal files. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 13, 2009 | |
|
07-15700
|
Kardoh v. U.S.
<EM>In pari delicto</EM> doctrine bars return of money used to illegally obtain alien registration cards. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 13, 2009 | |
|
S034072
|
People v. Curl
No right to jury trial or application of beyond a reasonable doubt standard to determine constitutional validity of prior conviction in capital case. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2009 | |
|
C059868
|
People v. Ochoa
Marijuana possession conviction occurring more than two years before current offenses does not negate eligibility for deferred entry of judgment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2009 | |
|
S157565
|
People v. McNeal
Statute prohibiting driving 'under the influence' presents rebuttable presumption that allows defendant to introduce partition ratio evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2009 | |
|
07-17322
|
Norwood v. Vance
Prison officials have qualified immunity where inmate was denied outdoor exercise during lockdowns imposed because of ongoing violent incidents. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2009 | |
|
B200408
|
People v. Sizemore
Trial court properly removes defendant from Proposition 36 drug treatment program where defendant was unamenable to treatment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 10, 2009 | |
|
07-16731
|
Ali v. Hickman
Comparative juror analysis shows that prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges to strike African-American jurors were not race-neutral. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 2009 | |
|
F054603
|
People v. Ramon
Gang expert's testimony alone does not constitute 'sufficient evidence' for sentencing enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 2009 | |
|
S024833
|
People v. Farley
Denial of change of venue motion is proper where defendant could not show reasonable likelihood of unfair trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 7, 2009 | |
|
S064337
|
People v. Rogers
Death sentence imposed on second degree murder count is improper where sentence only applied to two first degree murders. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 7, 2009 | |
|
08-30317
|
U.S. v. Old Chief
Sentencing enhancement for physical restraint of victim in stabbing offense is proper. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 7, 2009 | |
|
C055620
|
People v. Johndrow
Defendant declared sexually violent predator has sufficient access to judicial review of commitment to satisfy due process requirements. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 3, 2009 | |
|
S154847
|
People v. Nguyen
Juvenile adjudication can be used to enhance adult sentence despite lack of right to jury trial in juvenile proceedings. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 3, 2009 | |
|
A120767
|
People v. Bamberg
Conviction for preparing false evidence stands where defendant intended to defraud court into believing that photographs depicted a different location. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 2, 2009 |
