| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
05-55265
|
Yee v. Duncan
Where prosecutor failed to offer gender-neutral explanation for peremptory challenge, district court properly granted defendant's writ of habeas corpus. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 14, 2006 | |
|
04-10192
|
U.S. v. Valerio
Conviction for felon in firearm possession is proper where prior state conviction was not invalidated. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 14, 2006 | |
|
04-50183
|
U.S. v. Bridgeforth
In distribution of controlled substance case, court's limitations on impeachment of informant did not violate defendant's right of confrontation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 14, 2006 | |
|
04-55840
|
Jensen v. Pliler
Confrontation Clause did not bar admission of hearsay statements by deceased declarant made to his attorney. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 14, 2006 | |
|
03-55045
|
Buckley v. Terhune
Defendant was entitled to enforce term of plea agreement regarding sentencing where ambiguity providing for longer sentence was fault of district attorney. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 13, 2006 | |
|
05-5992
|
Zedner v. U.S.
Because defendant may not prospectively waive application of Speedy Trial Act, his waiver 'for all time' was ineffective. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 9, 2006 | |
|
05-10088
|
U.S. v. Mix
In kidnapping and aggravated sexual abuse case, life sentence was reasonable where court considered factors beyond sentencing guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2006 | |
|
E029354
|
People v. Oates
Sentence enhancement for great bodily injury can be applied multiple times despite single injury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2006 | |
|
04-55752
|
Edwards v. Warden
District court properly found there was reasonable probability that, but for counsel's ineffective assistance, defendant would have received different verdict. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 7, 2006 | |
|
D046044
|
People v. Najera
Court's failure to give sua sponte jury instruction on inference pertaining to possession of recently stolen property was not erroneous. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
A107822
|
People v. Evans
Defendant's rights were not violated where judge complied with Penal Code Section 1200 but did not allow defendant to speak after beginning to pronounce sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
H025445
|
People v. Ristau
Court was not required to instruct jury that sale of unregistered securities included scienter element. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
D044138
|
People v. Anzalone
Defense counsel provided ineffective assistance when he failed to object to misstatement of law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
05-30149
|
U.S. v. Bad Marriage
Court's imposition of more severe sentence on remand is proper where it concluded defendant was extremely dangerous. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
04-50161
|
U.S. v. Bear
Defendant's conviction is not proper where court's failure to give jury sua sponte instruction on public authority defense was plain error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
04-10343
|
U.S. v. Jennings
Bank robber's statement to teller that he had gun qualified as threat of death and subjected him to two-level sentencing enhancement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2006 | |
|
A106894
|
People v. Carmichael
Security fee under Penal Code Section 1465.8 could not be applied retroactively to conviction for offense occurring before effective date of statute. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 5, 2006 | |
|
05-50102
|
U.S. v. Lopez-Perera
Defendant's conviction for possessing firearm while unlawfully in United States is not proper because at time charged, he had not entered country. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 5, 2006 | |
|
05-10115
|
U.S. v. Morales-Perez
Statute prohibiting possession or purchase of cocaine base is not categorically drug trafficking offense for sentence enhancement purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 5, 2006 | |
|
06-99002
|
Morales v. Hickman
Requirement that anesthesiologist be present during execution sufficiently ensured condemned would not be subject to undue risk of extreme pain. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 5, 2006 | |
|
A107069
|
People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.
Forfeiture of bail must be set aside where Penal Code requires declaration that bail is forfeited 'in open court'. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 4, 2006 | |
|
D045636
|
People v. Rubics
Restitution to victim's family was proper in hit and run case because loss was incurred as result of commission of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2006 | |
|
F046238
|
People v. Lee
Despite being inmate himself, offender was properly convicted of conspiracy to furnish controlled substance to persons in custody. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2006 | |
|
05-502
|
Brigham City v. Stuart
Police may enter home without warrant when they have objectively reasonable belief that occupant is seriously injured or threatened with serious injury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 25, 2006 | |
|
A105383
|
People v. Hiscox
Ex post facto claim is proper where prosecutor failed to establish that sentence statute was in effect at time of defendant's offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 24, 2006 | |
|
04-50425
|
U.S. v. Hagege
Court committed error in viewing U.S. Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory when sentencing defendant for fraud. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 24, 2006 | |
|
S122590
|
Freeman on H.C.
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
A098085
|
People v. Johnson
In suppression hearing, prosecution may present investigating officer's affidavit in lieu of live testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
A097749
|
People v. McGee
Defendant is entitled to jury trial on factual issues regarding prior convictions used to enhance sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 | |
|
B160417
|
People v. Shabazz
Defendant sentenced to life without parole cannot receive enhancement of 25 years to life. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 23, 2006 |
