DAR

For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com

Daily appellate reports

Enewsletter Sign-up

Search Filters

Filter by date

to

Search by Case Name

Search by Judge

Search by Case Number

Search by DJ Citation Number

Search by Category

Search by Court

Case #	Name	Category	Court	Judge	Published
03-30334	U.S. v. Antelope Sex offender undergoing treatment cannot be compelled to detail sexual history that could be used for future prosecutions.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 25, 2005
04-30172	U.S. v. Garcia Newly-discovered evidence was 'fair and just reason' for withdrawal of guilty plea.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 25, 2005
04-35169	Fields v. Waddington State court's review of claim using federal principles does not transform claim into federal constitutional claim.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 25, 2005
03-10439	U.S. v. Ogles Firearms license issued to dealer is location-specific except for temporary sales locations.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 13, 2005
03-16573	Cassett v. Stewart Federal court may deny unexhausted habeas petition on merits only when it is perfectly clear that no colorable federal claim is raised.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 13, 2005
03-10009	U.S. v. Cardenas Defendant who waived appeal in plea agreement cannot appeal finding of ineligibility for safety valve relief.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 13, 2005
03-10551	U.S. v. Weatherspoon Vouching for credibility of witnesses constitutes prosecutorial misconduct that was prejudicial to defendant's case.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 13, 2005
03-10080	U.S. v. Luong Defendant acquitted of RICO charges may be subsequently charged under Hobbs Act.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
02-17150	Grotemeyer v. Hickman No juror misconduct occurred when jury foreman drew on her medical experience to form her opinions.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
A099250	People v. Noel Defendant convicted of second-degree murder after her dog mauled neighbor is not entitled to retrial.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
03-35081	Lambert v. Blodgett In evaluating habeas corpus petition, district court erroneously disregarded state courts' factual findings and conclusions of law.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
03-17098	Boyd v. Newland State court did not violate clearly established federal law by using nonjury juvenile adjudication to enhance sentence.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
03-35187	Docken v. Chase Petitioner's challenge to timing of parole review was properly cognizable under federal habeas statute.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
B176343	Fuller v. Superior Court (People) Assigning petitions for writs of habeas corpus to trial court judge whose ruling is subject of petition is improper.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
S119294	People v. Lopez Gang member sentenced to 25 years to life for murder cannot receive 10-year gang enhancement.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 12, 2005
04-5286	Dodd v. U.S. Defendant's motion to set aside conviction was filed after one-year limitations period expired.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 11, 2005
03-10322	U.S. v. Gordon District court correctly calculated defendant's restitution obligation based on 'date of loss.'	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 11, 2005
03-30470	U.S. v. Beck Prior to line-up, eyewitness's recollection may be refreshed through photographs of actual crime.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 11, 2005
03-50146	U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez Sentencing judge misapplied guidelines in determining levels of enhancement of defendant's sentence.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 11, 2005
S133325	People v. Tewolde Aggravating factors resulting in upper-term sentence for defendant should have been found true by jury.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 11, 2005
D044120	Brierton v. Department of Motor Vehicles Circumstances of defendant's driving provided reasonable suspicion for traffic stop and suspension of license.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 7, 2005
02-10210	U. S. v. Callum Wiretap order need not name authorizing party when it was authorized by empowered official.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jul. 6, 2005
03-10198	Halbert v. Michigan Michigan court must appoint counsel to defendant applying for leave to appeal following guilty plea.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 24, 2005
04-563	Mayle v. Felix Untimely habeas claim did not 'relate back' to earlier timely claim that asserted different grounds for relief.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 24, 2005
04-6432	Gonzalez v. Crosby Motion for relief from habeas judgment is not treated as successive petition if it does not claim state conviction error.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 24, 2005
02-10168	U.S. v. Bradley Police were entitled to enter private residence without warrant based on concern for child's welfare.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 22, 2005
A108693	Coffey v. Superior Court (People) Defendant convicted of 'wobbler' offense is not entitled to return of DNA samples.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 21, 2005
03-10511	U.S. v. Bergonzi Appeal of court's discovery order became moot when intervenor conceded that defendants were entitled to materials.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 20, 2005
04-30040	U.S. v. Lincoln Context of defendant's letter did not amount to 'true threat' against President's life.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 20, 2005
C043152	People v. Sumahit Sexually violent predator who refuses interview may not challenge sufficiency of evidence that he currently lacks ability to control his behavior.	Criminal Law and Procedure			Jun. 20, 2005