| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
C040863
|
People v. Esparza
Defendant with drug-related probation violation for underlying offense that is not drug related is ineligible for Proposition 36 treatment. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
|
B153102
|
People v. Smith
Tests used upon mixed samples of deoxyribonucleic acid to determine a distinct genetic profile is generally accepted in scientific community. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 2003 | |
|
02-50160
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez
Defendant receiving drug package had no reasonable expectation of privacy in workplace mail room. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-15195
|
Powell v. Galaza
Court improperly instructed jury that defendant's own testimony satisfied specific intent element of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-99007
|
Beardslee v. Woodford
Cumulative error claim of constitutional violations does not create substantial impact on murder conviction and death sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
B153082
|
People v. Morris
Defendant failed to make adequate record supporting 'Wheeler' motion challenging state's use of peremptory challenges against African American and Hispanic prospective jurors. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-10357
|
U.S. v. McKenna
'Perjury trap' doctrine is inapplicable where government's questioning of plaintiff was related to its role as defendant in civil action. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-10435
|
U.S. v. Etimani
Child witness must be aware of television monitor transmitting defendant yet monitor does not have to be in direct field of vision. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
00-10170
|
U.S. v. Arnett
Collateral estoppel may be used against criminal defendant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-30261
|
U.S. v. Brown
Court committed reversible error in failing to cure prosecutor's propensity statements in jury instructions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-10152
|
U.S. v. Cabrera
Theft of federal funds committed by government official had sufficient nexus to program receiving funds. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
02-10016
|
U.S. v. Bynum
District court did not err in declining to submit federal nexus question to jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 24, 2003 | |
|
01-17046
|
U.S. v. Montalvo
Failure to give specific unanimity instruction regarding continuing criminal enterprise offense is harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 18, 2003 | |
|
02-50141
|
U.S. v. Bonilla-Montenegro
District court properly enhanced defendant's sentence because offense of voluntary manslaughter is 'crime of violence' under sentencing guidelines. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 18, 2003 | |
|
D040216
|
People v. Rivera
Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to support finding that car was locked upon entry; evidence supports conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 17, 2003 | |
|
01-30419
|
U.S. v. Weber
Defendant who left voicemail in which he threatened judge is guilty of obstruction of justice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
|
02-15860
|
McNeely v. Blanas
Petitioner in custody since April 1998 without preliminary hearing or trial has been denied right to speedy trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
|
01-17113
|
U.S. v. Leonti
Viable ineffective assistance of counsel claim may arise in presentencing cooperation period. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2003 | |
|
02-30138
|
U.S. v. McNeil
Although bank did not suffer actual loss, sufficient evidence supports defendant's bank fraud conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 15, 2003 | |
|
02-1108
|
Opinion of Lockyer
In its civil "watchdog" capacity, grand jury may give secrecy admonition to witness; witness' violation may constitute contempt of court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 11, 2003 | |
|
01-55808
|
Gill v. Ayers
Defendant had right to testify at Three Strikes sentencing hearing to explain nature of prior conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 11, 2003 | |
|
01-50051
|
U.S. v. Banuelos
For sentencing purposes, court must determine quantity of drugs attributable to conspirator personally beyond reasonable doubt. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 11, 2003 | |
|
B148379
|
People v. Flores
Remand is proper remedy when defendant is ordered to pay attorney fees without notice and hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 11, 2003 | |
|
02-15139
|
Stillman v. LaMarque
Habeas petitioner is not entitled to benefit of mailbox rule but is entitled to equitable tolling because of prison officials' misconduct. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
|
01-16823
|
Ho v. Newland
Habeas petition was improperly denied where court failed to remedy erroneous jury instruction on elements of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 2003 | |
|
S004507
|
In re Cox on Habeas Corpus
Opinion |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 9, 2003 | |
|
G027381
|
Anthony L. v. Superior Court (People)
Penal Code Section 186.22(d) applies to all gang-related offenses and is more aptly characterized as penalty provision, not as substantive offense. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 6, 2003 | |
|
99-99022
|
Garceau v. Woodford
Jury instruction to infer criminal propensity from evidence of other crimes was not harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 3, 2003 | |
|
S105569
|
In re Bell
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2003 | |
|
S112904
|
People v. Palomino
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 2, 2003 |