| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
02-6026
|
Hamm v. Saffle
Petitioner who did not timely seek review of his removal from halfway house is barred from seeking federal habeas review. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 16, 2002 | |
|
01-4184
|
U.S. v. Neff
Use of handcuffs during investigative stop is appropriate and reasonable when officers receive reliable report that defendant is armed with dangerous weapon. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 16, 2002 | |
|
01-50597
|
U.S. v. Jimenez
District court erred by enhancing defendant's sentence pursuant to sentencing guidelines for use of minor to commit crime and for obstruction of justice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2002 | |
|
99-56673
|
Kelly v. Small
Where petitioner files 'mixed' federal habeas petition of both exhausted and unexhausted state claims, petition is dismissed without prejudice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2002 | |
|
01-30243
|
U.S. v. Belgarde
State Dept. of Family Services is not 'person' under Major Crimes Act and burglary indictment is properly dismissed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2002 | |
|
01-30281
|
U.S. v. Alarcon-Simi
Defendant's post-arrest statement is not admissible as excited utterance because it did not relate to incidents occurring at time of arrest. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2002 | |
|
F036711
|
People v. Hall
Trial court has authority to order defendant, who spat on prosecutor and investigator, to submit to testing for AIDS and other communicable diseases. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 13, 2002 | |
|
00-56199
|
Bennett v. Mueller
State has the burden to prove adequacy of state procedural bar to federal habeas review. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-6414
|
Foster v. Booher
For purpose of habeas review, prisoner is 'in custody' when serving a series of consecutive sentences. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-56521
|
Majoy v. Roe
Conviction where key witness admits to lying about defendant's involvement in crime may override defendants untimely petition for federal habeas review. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-10179
|
U.S. v. Lee
Defendant who unlawfully copied computer Website did not deserve sentence enhancement for possessing special computer skills. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-1007
|
Johnson v. Atherton
Petition for writ of habeas corpus is properly denied when ineffective assistance of counsel claim does not implicate voluntariness of plea. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
99-50760
|
U.S. v. Jimenez-Dominguez
District court did not commit plain error by failing to inquire whether guilty plea was result of discussions with prosecutor. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-30065
|
U.S. v. Huggins
Because government conducted thermal imaging search in good faith reliance on facially valid warrant, Fourth Amendment does not compel suppression of images. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
99-10170
|
U.S. v. Valensia
Despite multiple errors by government and court, defendant's sentence is affirmed based on overwhelming and uncontroverted evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50081
|
U.S. v. Geston
Conviction is reversed because prosecutor improperly asked witness to comment on truthfulness of other witnesses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-3185
|
Sternberg v. Secretary, Dept. of Health and Human Services
Sentencing agreement does not obligate government to exclude defendant's participation in Medicare program for period no longer than his incarceration. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50263
|
U.S. v. Diaz-Suarez
Based on totality of circumstances, investigatory stop was warranted by reasonable suspicion defendant was involved in criminal activity. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-50468
|
U.S. v. Marcucci
Grand jury charge that does not directly state the jury may refuse to indict if probable cause exists is constitutional. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-10643
|
U.S. v. Adamson
District court violated defendant's constitutional right of confrontation by prohibiting him from attacking his brother's credibility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-56697
|
Pagtalunan v. Galaza
District court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing habeas petition for failure to prosecute and comply with court order. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
00-6204
|
Hawkins v. Mullin
Court's interpretation that first-degree felony murder statute included kidnapping for extortion as underlying felony is foreseeable. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-7097
|
U.S. v. Sparks
Probable cause existed for search warrant for defendant's home because defendant's arrest was valid and residence was located near scene of crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-1261
|
U.S. v. Jose-Gonzalez
Court reasonably departed upward from guidelines to account for multiple deaths and injuries resulting from defendant's conduct of transporting unlawful aliens. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 10, 2002 | |
|
01-6071
|
Willingham v. Mullin
Denial of habeas petition is proper where manslaughter instruction was given without second-degree murder instruction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-3211
|
U.S. v. Mendez-Zamora
Expert testimony regarding roles in drug conspiracies did not attempt to take ultimate issue of guilt away from jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-1299
|
Saiz v. Burnett
Federal court failed to analyze state court's decision to exclude testimony for objective reasonableness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-5221
|
U.S. v. Erwin
Prohibition of commercial fishing is improper condition for supervised release for felon in possession of ammunition. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 9, 2002 | |
|
01-50288
|
U.S. v. Beckman
Improper cross-examination of defendant regarding prior arrest and conviction constituted harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 | |
|
S018815
|
People v. Gurule
Substantial evidence supports that defendant was given 'Miranda' warnings despite lack of recording. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 8, 2002 |