This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Norton
Defendant entitled to presentence confinement credit against sentence for offense committed while on parole.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
In the Interest of J.P.L.
Evidence supported adjudication of minor as delinquent based on threats made to classmates.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Scott v. Mullin
Habeas relief is warranted where prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Herrera v. Lemaster
District court must assess harmlessness of Fourth Amendment violation under 'Brecht v. Abrahamson' standard.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
Powell v. Ray
Elimination of pre-parole supervised release program did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 3, 2002
People v. Pineda-Eriza
Sentence enhancers may only be applied to certain offenses.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Pace
Wire fraud conviction is reversed due to improper venue.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
Taniguchi v. Schultz
Unavailability of deportation waiver for lawful permanent resident convicted of felony does not violate equal protection.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Long
Defendant who failed to establish residency in home lacked standing to challenge police search.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Monreal
California district court lacked jurisdiction to review conviction in Iowa district court.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
U.S. v. Rashkovski
Despite aliens' desires to emigrate without intention to engage in prostitution, sufficient evidence supports defendant's conviction for smuggling aliens for prostitution purposes.
Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 2, 2002
State v. Simmons
Evidence of intent was sufficient to support conviction for forgery.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Steele
Prior murder conviction is admissible to prove subsequent murder was committed with premeditation.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Slaughter
Prosecutor's biblical references during penalty phase argument were improper but harmless error.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
People v. Valencia
Penetration into area behind window screen qualifies as 'entry into any building' within meaning of burglary statute.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
State v. Oster
Separate jury instruction establishing elements of charged crime did not violate defendant's constitutional rights.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
State v. Zatkovich
Exceptional sentence for stalking was appropriate.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 27, 2002
U.S. v. Finley
Trial court erred in excluding psychological expert testimony that corroborated defense.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Prion
Trial court's errors require reversal of conviction and death sentence for first-degree murder.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Wible
Convictions for possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct are affirmed.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
State v. Fell (Waldstein)
Necessity defense does not apply to criminal offenses defined outside Title 13.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 26, 2002
Knighton v. Mullin
Admission of evidence of prior crimes committed by defendant did not result in unfair trial.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S. v. Stapleton
Defendant is vicariously liable for mail and wire fraud based on participation in telemarketing scheme.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S.v. Romero
Two-year level enhancement was proper for defendant who posed as INS employee and promised to expedite applications in exchange for money.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
US v. Mora
Proof requirement for penalties exceeding statutory maximum does not apply retroactively to initial habaes petitions.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S. v. Hanna
Court abused its discretion by allowing expert testimony on whether defendant's statements constituted serious threat against President.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
Hooker v. Mullin
Court affirms death sentence of man convicted of first-degree murder of common-law wife and her mother.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S. v. Hurlich
Record did not support court's enhancement of defendant's sentence.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
U.S. v. Chase
Psychiatrist's testimony of defendant's threats against FBI agents is not barred by psychotherapist-patient privilege.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 25, 2002
People v. Garcia
Defendant 's sentence enhancement was not proper where person who shot victim was not convicted of underlying felony.
Criminal Law and Procedure Aug. 22, 2002