| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
19714-0
|
State v. Jackson
Defendant did not have sufficient privacy interest to require warrant to attach global tracking device on vehicle. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 21, 2002 | |
|
00CA0923
|
People v. Mata
No ineffective assistance of counsel where defense counsel is charged with traffic offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
26165-1
|
State v. Spencer
Defendant was entitled to call witness to impeach credibility of other witness. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
48389-7
|
State v. King
Defendant's failure to register as sex offender counts as prior sex offense for purposes of sentencing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
20362-0
|
State v. Claypool
Interest on restitution accrues from date of judgment, not release from custody. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
27107-9
|
State v. McGovern
Affidavit contained sufficient facts to justify issuance of search warrant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
71387-1
|
Personal Restraint Petition of Mines
Parole board's failure to produce tape of revocation hearing requires new hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
70666-2
|
State v. Rodriguez
Prosecution witness should not have appeared in court in prison garb and shackles. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
01-10025
|
U.S. v. Ma
Court's improper colloquy during guilty plea does not constitute plain error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
00-99008
|
Jennings v. Woodford
Prejudicial error found where counsel failed to investigate psychiatric evidence which could have been presented as client's defense during murder trial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
01-55643
|
Reynolds v. Cambra
'Apprendi v. New Jersey' does not apply retroactively. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 20, 2002 | |
|
99CA2521
|
People v. Darbe
Self-defense instruction is not required to refer to defendant's exposure to domestic violence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 15, 2002 | |
|
01CA0215
|
People v. Barton
Defendant's due process rights were not violated where he was retried after jury failed to agree. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 15, 2002 | |
|
01CA0330
|
People v. Belgard
Defendant is not entitled to additional reduction of sentence after trial court reduces mandatory minimum sentence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 15, 2002 | |
|
01CA0446
|
People v. Campbell
Different penalties for use and possession of controlled substances do not violate equal protection requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 15, 2002 | |
|
19876-6
|
State v. Tarter
Numerous telephone calls and heavy traffic to hotel room within short period established probable cause to issue search warrant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
01-6016
|
Moore v. Schoeman
Habeas petition with unexhausted claims must be dismissed in entirety without prejudice or denied in entirety on merits. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
47738-2
|
State v. Gonzales
Trial with biased juror and prosecutorial misconduct requires retrial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
01-3360
|
U.S. v. Tush
Defendant's stipulation prior to guilty plea relieved government of proving interstate commerce element of arson. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
S092179
|
People v. Wutzke
Defendant who lives with victims' grandmother as her husband and has grandfather relationship with victim is 'relative' for purposes of probation eligibility. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
D029586
|
People v. Hurtado
Legislature's failure to define 'predatory' in sexually violent predator statute is harmless error and warrants defendant's committal to hospital. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
S082112
|
People v. Hurtado
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
19668-2
|
State v. Torres
Defendant's right to speedy trial was not violated, but he must be resentenced. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 14, 2002 | |
|
B132967
|
People v. Acosta
One strike and the three strikes laws are not intended to work exclusively, but are schemes that must operate jointly. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 13, 2002 | |
|
S097755
|
People v. Johnson
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 13, 2002 | |
|
19609-7
|
State v. Anderson
Defendant is guilty of intimidating witnesses even if threats were communicated indirectly. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 13, 2002 | |
|
01-6183
|
Johnson v. Champion
Defendant convicted of four counts of first-degree murder is entitled to conditional habeas relief. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 13, 2002 | |
|
00-0996
|
State v. Schinzel
Suspect in custody should have been advised of Miranda rights even though questions concerned unrelated crime. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2002 | |
|
20025-6
|
State v. Locati
Felon could not reasonably rely on permission from corrections officer to possess firearms. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 9, 2002 | |
|
48963-1
|
State v. H.J.
Redisposition of defendant's sentence did not violate prohibition against double jeopardy. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 8, 2002 |