For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
State v. Khounvichai
Police officers received consent to enter residence and question juvenile suspected of malicious mischief. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Rohrich
Charges of child molestation that were brought years after alleged incidents occurred were properly dismissed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Hardesty
Defendant incarcerated for probation violation must be charged for separate offense within 60 days. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Barnes
Conviction affirmed despite failure of prosecutor to file amended complaint with additional charge. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Rodgers
Insufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for drive-by shooting. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
City of College Place v. Staudenmaier
Police had probable cause to arrest defendant who appeared to have been drinking and failed physical tests. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Mora
Defendants committed theft when depleting relative's bank account. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Gillenwater
Defendants were not entitled to deferred prosecution when they had already received it in past. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Rose
In-custody defendant waived right to object to failure to bring him to trial within 60 days of arraignment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
Comaroto v. Pierce County Medical Examiner's Office
Suicide note of victim of child molestation is exempt from disclosure under Public Disclosure Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Kindsvogel
Defendant's right to speedy trial was violated when he was charged with drug offense several months after police discovered drugs. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
Stansfield v. Douglas County
Despite delay of more than two years, plaintiff may amend pleading to assert new claims based on same conduct. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Bryant
Informal immunity agreement entered into by prosecutor is not binding on neighboring prosecutor, but fundamental fairness requires dismissal. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Grendahl
Criminal defendant accused of robbery is entitled to new trial because of erroneous jury instruction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Jennings
Robbery conviction is reversed because of erroneous jury instruction regarding display of weapon. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Gibson
Use of inherent tendency test is not appropriate to determine whether third-party culpability evidence is admissible. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Hylton
Under Proposition 200, defendant who violated probation may be reinstated to probation but must receive additional terms. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Korovkin
Conviction for leaving scene of accident is affirmed despite defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct, insufficient evidence. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Duncan
Investigative stop for civil infraction does not provide probable cause to investigate more serious criminal violation. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
City of Spokane v. Marquette
Probationary period is tolled while probationer is sought on warrants. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Floreck
Audio tape of witness who later refuted statements should not have been admitted at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
State v. Cabrera
Procedural rules in DUI case do not extend statutory deadline falling on weekend or legal holiday to following business day. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 7, 2002
U.S. v. Hernandez-Castellanos
Felony endangerment under Arizona law is not, categorically, an aggravated felony for sentence enhancement purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2002
People v. Loyd
Two or more offenses of the same class may be joined together unless party seeking severance establishes substantial danger of prejudice. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 6, 2002
People v. Patterson
Custodial arrest for fine-only misdemeanor offense doesn't require suppression of evidence even if arrest violates California law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 2, 2002
U.S. v. Torres
'Apprendi' does not apply retroactively to successive petitions under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2002
U.S. v. Higgins
Court errs by relying on guesswork for calculating quantity of drugs for sentencing purposes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2002
Fisher v. Gibson
Defendant's attorney fails to adequatley challegeng prosecution's case or to act as loyal advocate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2002
U.S. v. Hughes
Sentencing cross-reference applies to defendant who causes minor to engage in sexual conduct for secondary purpose of making visual depiction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2002
Killian v. Poole
Because several substantial errors had cumulative effect of being prejudicial, denial of prisoner's habeas petition was improper. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 1, 2002
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.