For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
U.S. v. Hartsfield
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Raven v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Cosby
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Dighera
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Williams v. Snider
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Oliver v. Maxwell
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Glaze v. Hargett
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. McHorse
Uncharged acts of child molestation may be admitted if jury is properly instructed to consider only the crime charged. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Boyd v. Ward
Counsel isn't ineffective when counsel adequately investigated and prepared for trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Spencer
Where court is unable to calculate actual tax loss regarding defendant's fraudulent tax returns, court may use tax rate presumptions in Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Rucker
Sentence enhancements don't amount to double counting where defendant uses firearm in manner specified under Sentencing Guidelines. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
U.S. v. Espinoza-Ramirez
Opinion 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
Hendricks v. Ward
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 17, 1999
People v. Stevenson
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. White
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Cruz-Mendez
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
Denoyer v. U.S. Parole Commission
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Sterling
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
Deninno v. Jordan
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
Welch v. Champion
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Robbins
Appeal from order denying attorney fees sought because of government's alleged bad faith prosecution must be filed within 10 days. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Norred
Opinion 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Laughlin
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
Pennell v. Williams
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
State v. Razo
Sentence providing for period of community supervision must be expressed in terms of months or years, rather than days. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
U.S. v. Deleon
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
Porth v. Ferguson
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
State v. Pecard
Dismissal of indictments, where there are other less drastic measures to remedy constitutional violations, are improper. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
State v. Superior Court (Rosengren)
Absent any actual dispute as to correctness of test results, inspection and videotaping of crime lab's personnel and operating procedures is improper. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
State v. Taylor
Prior videotaped statement of minor is inadmissible hearsay. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Nov. 16, 1999
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.