Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-4139
|
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Vasquez
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
98-2050
|
Sena v. Lytle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
98-6115
|
Hendricks v. Hargett
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
98-8006
|
U.S. v. McMahon
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
98-1103
|
U.S. v. Fykes
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
97-3061
|
U.S. v. Shinault
Swearing in of new juror after voir dire but prior to any decision of the jury doesn't violate double jeopardy. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
97-4115
|
U.S. v. Torres-Guevara
Defendant's subjective belief that she wasn't free to leave during police encounter is irrelevant. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 9, 1998 | |
96CA0304
|
People v. Jefferson
No error where court failed to advise defendant dangers of proceeding pro se when counsel was still representing him |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
97CA0227
|
People v. Lopez
Sentencing court must include summary of days that defendant was resident of correction program in the mittimus. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
98-1025
|
Rutherford v. Neet
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
97SC174
|
Montanez v. People
Recall of discharged jurors to allow them to amend their verdict is improper. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
98SA100
|
People v. Salazar
Investigatory stop of suspect based on anonymous tip is improper when only innocent details of tip corroborated. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
98SA124
|
People v. Meraz
Evidence must be suppressed when search warrant fails to state how confidential informant obtained information. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
97-3178
|
U.S. v. Singleton
Federal prosecutors can't promise defendants anything of value in return for defendants' testimony. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
96-4126
|
U.S. v. Lin Lyn Trading Ltd.
Despite suppression of improperly obtained evidence, government can indict defendant based on legally acquired evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
97-1472
|
U.S. v. Roman
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 8, 1998 | |
97SC410
|
People v. Cobb
Trial court's decision to bar defense witness not disclosed before trial is excessive sanction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 7, 1998 | |
97-1063
|
U.S. v. May
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-6351
|
Morrison v. Guzik
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-7110
|
U.S. v. Lloyd
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-6199
|
U.S. v. Abbott
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-2212
|
Newton v. Moten
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-6388
|
U.S. v. Watkins
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 6, 1998 | |
97-2161
|
Neely v. Newton
Guilty but mentally ill verdict doesn't violate constitution and doesn't ensure sentencing to mental institution. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 1998 | |
97-5004 and 97-5132
|
English v. Cody
Oklahoma procedural bar can preclude review of ineffective assistance of counsel not raised on direct appeal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 1, 1998 | |
S069817
|
People v. Gentry
Prior juvenile adjudications aren't strikes under three strikes law when juvenile not adjudged ward of court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 30, 1998 | |
S069751
|
People v. Branscombe
Defendant's statements taken in deliberate violation of 'Miranda' can be introduced as rebuttal evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 30, 1998 | |
97-1317
|
Williams v. Furlong
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 26, 1998 | |
96-4144
|
U.S. v. Wiktor
Court clerk's inadvertent failure to file notice of appeal doesn't invalidate conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 1998 | |
97-1450
|
U.S. v. Stanphill
Probation officer needn't allow probationer to travel merely because travel has been allowed before. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 25, 1998 |