For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Terpin v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Victim of a SIM-swap scheme had a plausible Federal Communications Act claim against his carrier because, although the carrier did not disclose protected information, it still gave access to the information. 		Cyber Law 9th Oct. 1, 2024
Estate of Bride v. Yolo Technologies Inc.
Communications Decency Act did not shield anonymous messaging app from plaintiffs' misrepresentation claims. 		Cyber Law 9th Aug. 23, 2024
Zellmer v. Meta Platforms Inc.
Meta's face signatures could not be used to identify an individual and therefore could not be used as biometric identifiers in violation of Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act. 		Cyber Law 9th Jun. 18, 2024
Calise v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Social media company was not shielded by Communications Decency Act from liability for alleged violations of duty that arose independently from company's role as publisher of third-party content. 		Cyber Law, Contracts 9th Jun. 6, 2024
Modification: Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC
Trial court abused discretion in denying leave to amend claims alleging that Google and YouTube materially contributed to cryptocurrency scams. 		Cyber Law 6DCA Apr. 4, 2024
Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC
Trial court abused discretion in denying leave to amend claims alleging that Google and YouTube materially contributed to cryptocurrency scams. 		Cyber Law 6DCA Mar. 19, 2024
Rigsby v. GoDaddy, Inc.
GoDaddy.com, as a domain name registrant, is an interactive computer service that falls within the Communication Decency Act's protections. 		Cyber Law 9th Feb. 6, 2023
Prager University v. Google LLC
Suit asserting various state law claims against Youtube for exercising publisher's traditional editorial functions was precluded by the plain language of the Communications Decency Act. 		Cyber Law 6DCA Dec. 7, 2022
City of Reno v. Netflix Inc.
City's action against video streaming providers for alleged failure to pay franchise fees failed under Nevada's Video Service Law because statute did not confer a right of action on the city. 		Cyber Law 9th Oct. 31, 2022
Jane Does No. 1-6 v. Reddit Inc.
Reddit was shielded from liability for their users' posts of sexually explicit images of minors because they did not knowingly benefit from the alleged sex trafficking. 		Cyber Law 9th Oct. 25, 2022
ACA Connects v. Bonta
California law regulating broadband service providers was not preempted by FCC's federal regulatory authority because the FCC relinquished the authority to regulate the service providers when it reclassified them. 		Cyber Law 9th Jan. 31, 2022
Greenberg v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiffs were not precluded from filing action under Business and Professions Code Section 17529.5(a)(2) because they alleged defendant's marketing partners failed to identify themselves in email domain names. 		Cyber Law 1DCA/1 Jun. 23, 2021
Gonzalez v. Google
Plaintiff's claims that Google was directly and secondarily liable for ISIS's acts of international terrorism were barred pursuant to Section 230 of Communications Decency Act. 		Cyber Law 9th Jun. 23, 2021
Van Buren v. U.S.
'Exceeds authorized access' clause of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act does not extend to those who access computer with authorization but for an improper purpose. 		Cyber Law USSC Jun. 4, 2021
Clare v. Clare
Summary judgment was reversed because husband's unauthorized access into his wife's work e-mails could constitute violation of Stored Communications Act. 		Cyber Law 9th Dec. 9, 2020
Amended Opinion: Enigma Software v. Malwarebytes, Inc.
The immunity provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not apply to software that the provider finds objectionable for anti-competitive reasons. 		Cyber Law 9th Jan. 2, 2020
Enigma Software v. Malwarebytes, Inc.
The immunity provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does not apply to software that the provider finds objectionable for anti-competitive reasons. 		Cyber Law 9th Sep. 13, 2019
HiQ Labs v. LinkedIn Corp.
Preliminary injunction was properly granted by the district court since plaintiff made sufficient showings of the elements set forth by 'Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.' 		Cyber Law 9th Sep. 10, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.