For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco
Summary judgment on overtime claim was improper where material questions of fact existed as to whether City of San Francisco's published salary ordinance was actually used in practice. 		Employment Law 9th Sep. 12, 2024
Modification: Taylor v. Tesla, Inc.
Despite pending parallel litigation, refusal to respond to employee record requests under the Labor Code was not protected conduct subject to the provisions of the anti-SLAPP statute. 		Anti-SLAPP, Employment Law 1DCA/4 Sep. 4, 2024
Stone v. Alameda Health System
Hospital authority was a public employer the Legislature intended to be exempt from Labor Code statutes regarding meal and rest breaks and timely payment of wages. 		Employment Law CASC Aug. 16, 2024
Taylor v. Tesla, Inc.
Despite pending parallel litigation, refusal to respond to employee record requests under the Labor Code was not protected conduct subject to the provisions of the anti-SLAPP statute. 		Anti-SLAPP, Employment Law 1DCA/4 Aug. 12, 2024
Parker v. BNSF Railway Company
District court improperly applied the Federal Railroad Safety Act, which prohibits discharge due even "in part" to an employee's refusal to violate a railroad safety regulation. 		Employment Law 9th Aug. 12, 2024
Kennedy v. Las Vegas Sands Corporation
Corporate pilots were exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act because they qualified as highly compensated, non-manual employees under the Act's definition. 		Employment Law 9th Aug. 2, 2024
Turrieta v. Lyft, Inc.
Aggrieved employee asserting claims under Private Attorneys General Act has no personal or representative right to intervene in another aggrieved employee's action asserting overlapping claims. 		Employment Law, Civil Procedure CASC Aug. 2, 2024
Okonowsky v. Garland
A colleague's social media page could reasonably create an objective hostile work environment under Title VII. 		Employment Discrimination, Employment Law 9th Jul. 26, 2024
Castellanos, et al. v. State of California, et al.
Proposition 22 (classifying app-based drivers as independent contractors) does not conflict with Article XIV, Section 4 of the California Constitution. 		Constitutional Law, Employment Law CASC Jul. 26, 2024
Ruelas v. County of Alameda
Non-convicted incarcerated individuals performing services in county jails for a private, for-profit company had no wage and hour claims under the California Labor Code. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Employment Law 9th Jul. 29, 2024
Cadena v. Customer Connexx LLC
The de minimis doctrine remains applicable to workers' claims for overtime wages under Section 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 		Employment Law 9th Jul. 11, 2024
Musquiz v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
Retired railworker was without fault for overpayments made by Railroad Retirement Board after the Board sent him a letter stating that it had adjusted his annuity based on additional wages. 		Employment Law 9th Jul. 5, 2024
Perez v. Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc.
Family and Medical Leave Act does not require an employer to present contrary medical evidence before contesting a doctor's certification of a serious health condition. 		Employment Law 9th Jul. 1, 2024
Rajaram v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
42 U.S.C. Section 1981 prohibits discrimination in hiring against United States citizens based on their citizenship. 		Employment Discrimination, Employment Law 9th Jun. 28, 2024
Paleny v. Fireplace Products U.S., Inc.
Egg retrieval and freezing procedures did not qualify as a pregnancy-related medical condition or disability protected by FEHA. 		Employment Discrimination, Employment Law 3DCA Jun. 28, 2024
Lusardi Construction Co. v. Dept. of Industrial Relations
Under former Labor Code Section 1777.7, prime contractor's knowledge of subcontractor's noncompliance with apprenticeship hiring requirements was sufficient to support penalizing the prime contractor for the noncompliance. 		Employment Law, Remedies 4DCA/1 Jun. 26, 2024
Frayo v. Martin
Employee's refusal to take and provide the results of a COVID-19 test to his employer was not a refusal to sign an authorization under the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. 		Employment Law 6DCA Jun. 25, 2024
Ibarra v. Chuy & Sons Labor, Inc.
Defining aggrieved employees in a prelitigation notice is not required for a Private Attorneys General Act claim to proceed. 		Employment Law 2DCA/6 Jun. 20, 2024
Olson v. State of California
California's differential treatment of worker misclassification in the transportation and delivery services sector relative to other sectors passed rational basis review. 		Employment Law 9th Jun. 11, 2024
Hoglund v. Sierra Nevada Memorial-Miners Hospital
Substantial evidence supported plaintiff's age discrimination claim because ample evidence demonstrated that significant participant in her termination exhibited discriminatory animus towards her and that reasons for her firing were pretextual. 		Employment Discrimination, Employment Law 3DCA May 20, 2024
Diaz v. Macys West Stores Inc.
District court erred by compelling arbitration of non-individual Private Attorneys General Act claims. 		Arbitration, Employment Law 9th May 13, 2024
Bafford v. Administrative Committee of the Northrop Grumman Pension Plan
An ERISA plan administrator's duty to provide pension benefit statements is not met if the provided statements are substantially inaccurate. 		Employment Law, Civil Procedure 9th May 10, 2024
Naranjo v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.
Employers are not subject to civil penalties for failure to comply with wage statement requirements when they had a reasonable good faith belief they complied with Labor Code Section 226. 		Employment Law, Remedies CASC May 7, 2024
LaMarr v. The Regents of the University of California
Because intent to terminate was never issued and employer's demotion was voluntary, substantial evidence supported that employee was not entitled to *Skelly* hearing. 		Employment Law 3DCA Apr. 25, 2024
Mondragon v. Sunrun Inc.
Former employee may continue his individual PAGA claims in court when circumstances surrounding arbitration agreement did not evidence parties' clear intent for arbitrator to decide arbitrability issues. 		Arbitration, Employment Law 2DCA/7 Apr. 24, 2024
Ruelas v. County of Alameda
Nonconvicted incarcerated individuals providing labor for a for-profit private company to supply meals within a county jail do not have a claim for minimum and overtime wages. 		Prisoners' Rights, Employment Law CASC Apr. 23, 2024
Balderas v. Fresh Start Harvesting, Inc.
Aggrieved employee had standing to bring a Private Attorneys General Act claim despite not having filed an individual action against employer. 		Employment Law 2DCA/6 Apr. 22, 2024
Shah v. Skillz Inc.
Calculating stock options damages for breach of contract was not limited to the difference between the stock options' exercise price and the value of the stock at employee's termination. 		Employment Law 1DCA/5 Apr. 10, 2024
Silva v. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.
Emergency Ambulance Employee Safety and Preparedness Act's requirements regarding work shifts applied retroactively to ambulance worker's class action. 		Employment Law 1DCA/1 Apr. 8, 2024
Gramajo v. Joe's Pizza on Sunset, Inc.
Pizza delivery driver was entitled to attorney's fees and costs because Labor Code Section 1194(a) was more specific and more recently enacted than Code of Civil Procedure Section 1033(a). 		Employment Law 2DCA/8 Mar. 27, 2024
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.