This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Townsend v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
District court must instruct jury that it may, but need not, infer discriminatory intent from disbelief of employer's explanation for termination.
Employment Law Sep. 17, 2002
Colarossi v. Coty US Inc.
Circumstantial evidence presented sufficient retaliatory motives for wrongful termination.
Employment Law Sep. 17, 2002
Puget Sound Energy v. Adamo
Employee who slipped and fell in employer's parking lot was entitled to benefits for injury.
Employment Law Sep. 15, 2002
Friedman v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Veganism is not religious creed within meaning of California Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Employment Law Sep. 15, 2002
Clayton-Brame v. Superior Court (In re Los Angeles County Dept. of Health Services)
Employee had no reasonable expectation of promotion despite selection of candidate with lower test score.
Employment Law Sep. 11, 2002
Rakity v. Dillon Co,
Plaintiff's lifting limitation is not disability within meaning of ADA.
Employment Law Sep. 9, 2002
Estes v. Wyoming Department of Transportation
State agency waives sovereign immunity when it removes action to federal court.
Employment Law Sep. 9, 2002
Davey v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
Opinion
Employment Law Aug. 29, 2002
Atascadero Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Workers' compensation benefits are not available for psychiatric injury caused by workplace gossip about personal life.
Employment Law Aug. 27, 2002
Pickern v. Holiday Quality Foods Inc.
Disabled plaintiff within the Americans With Disabilities Act does not need to attempt to gain access during the statutory period to establish actual injury.
Employment Law Aug. 25, 2002
Foster v. Alliedsignal, Inc.
Injured worker produced sufficient evidence of her retaliatory firing by employer to survive summary judgment.
Employment Law Aug. 25, 2002
Boeing Co. v. Heidy
Benefits for worker who suffers from hearing loss cannot be reduced merely because people his age suffer age-related hearing loss.
Employment Law Aug. 22, 2002
Walrath v. Sprinkel
Individual supervisor may be liable for retaliation against employee in violation of Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Employment Law Aug. 20, 2002
Wisehart v. Meganck
Claim that termination of employee was based on fraud does not constitute exception to employment at-will doctrine.
Employment Law Aug. 20, 2002
City of Port Orchard v. Dept. of Retirement Systems
Dept. of Retirement Systems is not required to reimburse cities for temporary disability benefits paid to law enforcement officers and fire fighters.
Employment Law Aug. 19, 2002
Putz v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona
Self-employed contractor who hired extra help 24 days over four month period did not constitute "regular employment" under worker's compensation statute.
Employment Law Aug. 16, 2002
Ferroni v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Warehousemen Local No. 222
In Equal Pay Act claim, plaintiff failed to show she was paid less than male employees for substantially equal work.
Employment Law Aug. 13, 2002
Higginbottom v. State of Arizona
Appointed position of Director of Department of Racing qualifies as at-will employment.
Employment Law Aug. 13, 2002
Kilian v. Atkinson
Independent contractor may not assert claim of age discrimination under state law.
Employment Law Aug. 9, 2002
Funkhouser v. Wells Fargo Bank
Company's switch to less favorable benefits package does not constitute violation under the Family Medical Leave Act.
Employment Law Aug. 8, 2002
Allison v. Bank One - Denver
Bank is liable for ERISA violation when it fails to make 'adequate provisions for continued prudent management' of plan assets.
Employment Law Aug. 8, 2002
Ruiz v. Cabrera
Injured employee's exclusive remedy is workers' compensation where employer is licensed farm labor contractor.
Employment Law Aug. 8, 2002
Moffett v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Court properly dismissed plaintiff's claims against disability plan administrators alleging violations of ERISA and state law.
Employment Law Aug. 8, 2002
Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Co.
Company's policy not to rehire employees who resigned due to violations of personal conduct rules violates ADA, as applied to rehabilitated drug addicts.
Employment Law Aug. 7, 2002
Danville v. Regional Lab Corp.
Applicant offered sufficient evidence that decision not to interview her for job was pretext for age bias.
Employment Law Aug. 7, 2002
Stewart v. State of Oklahoma
Title VII claim against state does not require right-to-sue letter from U.S. Attorney General.
Employment Law Aug. 7, 2002
Whitney v. Board of Education of Grand County
Because school board knew teacher suffered from depression at time it terminated her, district court's reasoning in dismissing ADA claim was erroneous.
Employment Law Aug. 7, 2002
Silo v. CHW Medical Foundation
Catholic hospital isn't liable nor in violation of public policy for terminating employee for using what it considered objectionable religious speech in workplace.
Employment Law Aug. 6, 2002
Jersey v. John Muir Medical Center
Hospital does not violate 'fundamental public policy' when it terminates at-will employee who refuses to dismiss her suit against former patient.
Employment Law Aug. 6, 2002
Tomlinson v. Qualcomm Inc.
Employee laid off while on maternity leave fails to establish discrimination claim.
Employment Law Aug. 6, 2002