For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Brown v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.
Plaintiff adequately pled cause of action for failure to provide reasonable accommodation for her disability. 		Employment Law 2DCA/8 Feb. 22, 2021
Choochagi v. Barracuda Networks, Inc.
Trial court did not err in its application of 'McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green' test to plaintiff's California Family Rights Act claim. 		Employment Law 6DCA Feb. 3, 2021
Kao v. Joy Holiday
Trial court properly ruled that appellants, as alter egos of travel tour company that they owned and operated, were personally liable for respondent's unpaid wages. 		Employment Law 1DCA/3 Dec. 9, 2020
Modification: People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Because drivers performed services for defendant rideshare companies in usual course of defendants' businesses, there was reasonable probability of prevailing on drivers' claim that defendants misclassified drivers. 		Employment Law 1DCA/4 Nov. 25, 2020
People v. Superior Court (Cal Cartage Transportation Express, LLC)
Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 does not preempt application of 'ABC' test under 'Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court.' 		Employment Law 2DCA/4 Nov. 23, 2020
Lares v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendant because defendant did not violate California Family Rights Act. 		Employment Law 2DCA/4 Oct. 27, 2020
People v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Because drivers performed services for defendant rideshare companies in usual course of defendants' businesses, there was reasonable probability of prevailing on drivers' claim that defendants misclassified drivers. 		Employment Law 1DCA/4 Oct. 26, 2020
Sanchez v. Martinez
Although trial court mistakenly deprived plaintiffs from choosing their preferred course of recovery, plaintiffs were not prejudiced in being forced to take option that maximized their recovery. 		Employment Law 3DCA Sep. 15, 2020
Morgado v. City and County of San Francisco
Employer's monetary obligation to wrongfully terminated employee 'may be mitigated by deducting compensation or benefits actually received by employee that are inconsistent with original employment.' 		Employment Law 1DCA/4 Aug. 28, 2020
Modification: Pasos v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Com.
Trial court erred by substituting its own discretion for that of Sheriff's Department in determining appropriate penalty for deputy sheriff's failure to report another deputy's use of force against inmate. 		Employment Law 2DCA/7 Aug. 20, 2020
Robinson v. Southern Counties Oil Co.
Because present action and another, resolved, class action involved PAGA claims based on same alleged violations of Labor Code, claim preclusion barred relitigation of present claim. 		Employment Law 1DCA/4 Aug. 17, 2020
Pasos v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Com.
Trial court erred by substituting its own discretion for that of Sheriff's Department in determining appropriate penalty for deputy sheriff's failure to report another deputy's use of force against inmate. 		Employment Law 2DCA/7 Jul. 29, 2020
Modification: Gutierrez v. Brand Energy Services of California
Trial court erred in interpreting Wage Order 16 Section 5(D) as permitting employees and employers to enter CBA's that waived right to all compensation for employer-mandated travel time. 		Employment Law 1DCA/3 Jul. 7, 2020
Gutierrez v. Brand Energy Services of California
Trial court erred in interpreting Wage Order 16 Section 5(D) as permitting employees and employers to enter CBA's that waived right to all compensation for employer-mandated travel time. 		Employment Law 1DCA/3 Jun. 18, 2020
Willis v. City of Carlsbad
Equitable tolling doctrine did not apply because initial six month claim presentation deadline under Government Claims Act was not a statute of limitations. 		Employment Law 4DCA/1 May 13, 2020
Tilkey v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Defendant did not wrongfully terminate plaintiff in violation of Labor Code Section 432.7 based on plaintiff's participation in Arizona domestic nonviolence diversion program. 		Employment Law 4DCA/1 Apr. 22, 2020
Herrera v. Zumiez Inc.
Requiring employees to call manager thirty minutes to one hour before scheduled shift constitutes 'reporting for work.' 		Employment Law 9th Mar. 20, 2020
Alexander v. Community Hospital of Long Beach
Civil FEHA actions require exhaustion of administrative remedies even where defendant had actual notice of complaint and opportunity to participate in administrative processes. 		Employment Law 2DCA/1 Mar. 12, 2020
Frlekin v. Apple Inc.
An employer's level of control over employees, not the mandatory nature of employees' activity, determines whether 'hours worked' are compensable under Wage Order 7. 		Employment Law CASC Feb. 14, 2020
United Educators of San Francisco v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Bd.
A school district's summer session is considered an academic term if its enrollment, staffing, and instruction resemble the district's other academic terms; non-summer-retained employees are thus eligible for unemployment benefits. 		Employment Law CASC Jan. 17, 2020
St. Myers v. Dignity Health
Revenue cycling servicer was not a joint-employer because its modicum degree of control over plaintiff's pay was insufficient. 		Employment Law 3DCA Jan. 16, 2020
Mathews v. Happy Valley Conference Center, Inc.
Although trial court erred by failing to highlight centralized control of labor relations as a critical factor in the 'integrated enterprise' test, error was harmless because substantial evidence supported that factor. 		Employment Law 6DCA Dec. 16, 2019
Amended Opinion: Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.
Because franchisor did not retain control of day-to-day aspects of work at franchises, and merely asserted quality control, franchisor was not a joint employer of franchisee. 		Employment Law 9th Dec. 12, 2019
County of Ventura v. Public Employment Relations Bd.
A joint-employer relationship exists when the employers exert significant control over the same employees, and where the employers have control over what is done and how it shall be done. 		Employment Law 2DCA/6 Nov. 25, 2019
Jimenez v. U.S. Continental Marketing, Inc.
Insufficient evidence supported finding plaintiff was not defendant's employee for Fair Employment and Housing Act purposes, and ample evidence supported finding defendant exercised direction and control over plaintiff's employment. 		Employment Law 4DCA/1 Oct. 21, 2019
Henderson v. Equilon Enterprises
Only an employer can be liable for claims of inadequate compensation. A Multi-Site Operator Agreement is insufficient to prove that an employer-employee relationship exists on a joint employer liability theory. 		Employment Law 1DCA/1 Oct. 10, 2019
Nejadian v. County of Los Angeles
Plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict on both of his retaliation causes of action, and the trial court's jury instruction on plaintiff's FEHA claim was erroneous. 		Employment Law 2DCA/4 Oct. 3, 2019
Salazar v. McDonald's Corp.
Because franchisor did not retain control of day-to-day aspects of work at franchises, and merely asserted quality control, franchisor was not a joint employer of franchisee. 		Employment Law 9th Oct. 2, 2019
Gupta v. Trustees of the Cal. State University
Plaintiff in Fair Employment and Housing Act case may present comparative evidence if plaintiff and comparator are similarly situated in all relevant aspects and comparator was treated more favorably. 		Employment Law 1DCA/3 Sep. 30, 2019
Hawkins v. City of Los Angeles
Plaintiffs presented prima facie case of whistleblower retaliation and substantial evidence supported jury's finding that City's proffered reasons for termination of plaintiffs were pretextual. 		Employment Law 2DCA/3 Sep. 26, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.