For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency
Respondent did not follow CEQA requirements when determining project would not have significant effect on environment. 		Environmental Law Jul. 19, 2004
Ocean View Estates Homeowners Assn. Inc. v. Montecito Water District
Subsequent measures taken to mitigate environmental and aesthetic impact of reservoir cover don't satisfy California Environmental Quality Act. 		Environmental Law Jul. 12, 2004
Association for a Cleaner Environment v. Yosemite Community College
Community college's action constitutes project for purposes of CEQA and requires initial environmental study. 		Environmental Law Jul. 12, 2004
Ocean Advocates v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District court must reevaluate whether issuance of permit to build addition to oil refinery dock violates Magnuson Amendment. 		Environmental Law Jul. 12, 2004
U.S. v. Phillips
Under sentencing guidelines, district court must include all reliable cleanup expenses for determination of enhancement. 		Environmental Law Jun. 29, 2004
Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Whittier Properties Inc.
Contamination clean-up insurance policy may not be rescinded based on insured's misrepresentations. 		Environmental Law Jun. 29, 2004
Public Citizens v. Dept. of Transportation
Department of Transportation acted arbitrarily when failing to prepare a full environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Protection Act. 		Environmental Law Jun. 22, 2004
Dept. of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Federal agency was not required to consider environmental effects of increase in cross-border traffic from Mexican motor carriers. 		Environmental Law Jun. 14, 2004
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service's failure to disclose and analyze opposing scientific viewpoints regarding goshawks violates environmental laws and regulations. 		Environmental Law May 19, 2004
Engine Manufacturers Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
Order 		Environmental Law May 3, 2004
State of California v. Neville Chemical Co.
Deadline to sue for remedial action costs under CERCLA begins after final adoption of action plan. 		Environmental Law Apr. 12, 2004
Western Properties Service Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
Court's findings of fact that oil companies arranged for waste disposal on property in 1940s is not clearly erroneous. 		Environmental Law Apr. 12, 2004
Covington v. Jefferson County
Family that lives across from county dump has standing to sue under Clean Air Act. 		Environmental Law Apr. 6, 2004
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
Case is remanded for further proceedings regarding parties' dispute over necessity of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. 		Environmental Law Mar. 30, 2004
Santa Teresa Citizen Action Group v. City of San Jose
City's decision to extend water recycling program did not require preparation of second environmental impact report. 		Environmental Law Mar. 15, 2004
United States v. Clifford Matley Family Trust
Court-appointed Water Master adopted incorrect standard in approving farm land reclassification petition. 		Environmental Law Mar. 11, 2004
County of Orange v. Superior Court (Vedanta Society of Southern California)
Court decides that inclusion of an addendum to an administrative record in a CEQA case would not be improper. 		Environmental Law Jan. 23, 2004
State of Alaska v. EPA
EPA has authority to decide whether state has compiled with 'Best Available Control Technology' requirements of Clean Air Act. 		Environmental Law Jan. 21, 2004
The Wilderness Society v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Permit for salmon enhancement project violates Wilderness Act by sanctioning impermissible commercial enterprise. 		Environmental Law Jan. 6, 2004
County of Okanogan v. National Marine Fisheries
Placement of restrictions in use of water rights to protect endangered fish were within authority of Forest Service. 		Environmental Law Jan. 5, 2004
Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest Service
Environmental groups may seek preliminary injunction against timber sales in Sierra Nevada mountains. 		Environmental Law Dec. 23, 2003
Commonwealth of Virginia v. State of Maryland
Supreme Court rules that state of Virginia retains right to use water from the Potomac River consistent with Black-Jenkins Award. 		Environmental Law Dec. 15, 2003
Encinitas Country Day School, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission
California Coastal Commission failed to determine within 49-day period whether issuance of permit was proper. 		Environmental Law Nov. 21, 2003
Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency (Pacific Gas & Electric)
Environmental Impact Report which addressed withdrawal of water from Russian River was inadequate under CEQA. 		Environmental Law Nov. 21, 2003
Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera
County adequately considered environmental impacts in approving construction of dairy. 		Environmental Law Nov. 21, 2003
Communities for a Better Environment v. State Water Resources Control Board
Permit that limits refinery's discharges into water need not specify numeric levels of pollution. 		Environmental Law Nov. 20, 2003
Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton
Environmental plan violates Wild and Scenic Rivers Act by insufficiently addressing user capacities and improperly setting river area boundaries. 		Environmental Law Nov. 5, 2003
Protect Our Water v. County of Merced (Calaveras Materials Inc.)
Because record to court does not evidence agency's compliance with California Environmental Quality Act, approval of project is reversed. 		Environmental Law Oct. 24, 2003
Laub v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
Lawsuit challenging government management of California Bay-Delta is ripe for review. 		Environmental Law Oct. 22, 2003
Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
Environmental group may sue federal agency that promulgated forest management policy. 		Environmental Law Oct. 21, 2003
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.