Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
99-15896
|
Environmental Protection Information Center v. Simpson Timber Co.
Fish and Wildlife Service did not retain sufficient discretionary control over incidental take permit and reinitiation of consultation is not required. |
Environmental Law |
|
Sep. 9, 2001 | |
B144335
|
Apartment Assn. of Greater Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
City's housing code enforcement program is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act, therefore environmental impact report isn't required. |
Environmental Law |
|
Sep. 6, 2001 | |
E027043
|
San Bernadino Valley Audubon Society v. Metropolitan Water District
Trial court erred in failing to require preparation of full environmental impact reports required by state environmental law. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 23, 2001 | |
99-36027
|
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously by ignoring aggregated short-term environmental impacts on fish habitats. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 22, 2001 | |
H020900
|
Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of Supervisors (September Ranch Partners)
Board of Supervisors certification of environmental impact report not supported by evidence is abuse of discretion. |
Environmental Law |
|
Aug. 14, 2001 | |
26089-1-II
|
Washington State Department of Transportation v. City of Seattle
Prevailing party of contribution action sought under Model Toxics Control Act is entitled to reasonable attorney fees. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jul. 22, 2001 | |
S085088
|
Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre
Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act is required when project is proposed and placed on ballot by public agency. |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 29, 2001 | |
B129139
|
Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre
Placing a resolution on a ballot is within the California Environmental Quality Act's definition of a 'project.' |
Environmental Law |
|
Jun. 28, 2001 | |
A079606
|
Redwood Coast Watersheds Alliance v. California State Board of Forestry
Grant of declaratory relief is proper to clarify mandatory duties of state agency under California Forest Practice Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 23, 2001 | |
00-2050
|
New Mexico Cattle Growers Association v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
United States Fish and Wildlife Service improperly refused to consider economic factors when designating critical habitat for Southwestern Willow Flycatcher. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 23, 2001 | |
99-1257
|
Browner v. AM Trucking Assns. Et al.
Court to decide whether EPA has authority to develop intelligible criteria for risk management decisions for national ambient air quality standards. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 17, 2001 | |
98-16099
|
Defenders of Wildlife v. Bernal
Injunction is not warranted where school construction does not result in 'taking' of pygmy-owl under Endangered Species Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 16, 2001 | |
00-70015
|
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. v. Abraham
Court lacks jurisdiction to hear challenge to agency order regarding radio active waste that isn't 'decision' under Nuclear Waste Policy Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 16, 2001 | |
98-3337
|
Rural Water District No. 1 v. City of Wilson
Rural water district that charges excessive rates does not make water services 'available' under federal statute. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
98-71158
|
Ober v. Whitman
Environmental Protection Agency has authority to designate de minimis exemptions to 1990 amendments of Clean Air Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 9, 2001 | |
98-56940
|
Cantrell v. City of Long Beach
City residents may challenge proposed use of naval station under federal environmental statute but not state law. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 8, 2001 | |
99-36065
|
National Parks & Conservation Assoc. v. Babbitt
When Environmental Assessment establishes that agency's action may have significant effect on environment, agency is required to complete environmental impact statement. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 8, 2001 | |
99-1426
|
AM. Trucking Assns. v. Browner
EPA is not required to consider costs and attainment consequences of its revised national ambient air quality standards. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
99-6343
|
U.S. v. Lewis
Violation of Oklahoma hunting law is sufficient basis on which to bring federal wildlife protection prosecution. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 7, 2001 | |
47262-3
|
Wells v. Whatcom County Water District No. 10
Court approves county examiner's approval of conditional use permit for sewer interceptor near Lake Whatcom. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 30, 2001 | |
44941-9-I
|
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. Alba General Insurance Co.
Third party insurers aren't relieved from liability if insured can prove settlements with other carriers are for sites other than those in present claim. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 25, 2001 | |
44838-2
|
Bowers v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
Agency properly balanced health risks with economic costs in ordering plant to reduce air pollutants. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 25, 2001 | |
43092-1
|
Plum Creek Timber Co. v. Washington State Forest Practices Appeals Board
Evidence supports Forest Practices Appeals Board's conclusion that proposed road project will not have significant adverse impact upon local recreation and aesthetics. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 20, 2001 | |
H013360, H015090, H015511, H016104, H016674, H016805, H016806 and H017215
|
FMC Corporation v. Plaisted and Companies
Court's decision to consider appeals from recitations of lower court's findings moots appealability issue. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 19, 2001 | |
B106181
|
Azusa Land Reclamation Co. Inc. v. Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster
Dumping waste in landfill located over reservoir is 'project' subject to California Environmental Quality Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2001 | |
94-16234
|
City Carmel-by-the-Sea v. U.S. Dept. of Transportation
Lead agency can designate specific proposal as project goal in section of environmental impact statement/report. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2001 | |
B131122
|
The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
South Coast Air Quality Management District complied with law by compiling required studies to support their proposed restrictions on flat paint pollutants. |
Environmental Law |
|
Apr. 1, 2001 | |
99-2346
|
Amigos Bravos v. EPA
Order |
Environmental Law |
|
Mar. 28, 2001 | |
00-8016
|
Wyoming Timber Industry Association v. U.S. Forest Service
Order |
Environmental Law |
|
Mar. 28, 2001 | |
99-1178
|
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Clean Water Act doesn't grant government authority to prohibit disposal of waste in isolated waters despite evidence that migratory birds occupy area. |
Environmental Law |
|
Mar. 21, 2001 |