For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Sign up for Daily Journal emails
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Center for Community Action v. Federal Aviation Administration
Petitioners seeking review of a Federal Aviation Administration Final Environmental Assessment finding bear the burden of showing missteps on the part of the FAA. 		Environmental Law 9th Nov. 19, 2021
Amended Opinion: Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay
Because a failure to provide information about pollutant discharge violations could increase the risk of harm to recreational users of a nearby river, plaintiffs had standing to bring suit. 		Environmental Law 9th Nov. 8, 2021
Farmland Protection Alliance v. County of Yolo
A trial court did not have the authority under the California Environmental Quality Act to split a project's impact analysis across two types of environmental review documents. 		Environmental Law 3DCA Nov. 4, 2021
Protect Tustin Ranch v. City of Tustin
Substantial evidence supported a city's finding that the size of a proposed construction project qualified for the infill exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act. 		Environmental Law 4DCA/3 Oct. 28, 2021
McCann v. City of San Diego
The City of San Diego erred when it did not consider whether new projects were consistent with its own Climate Action Plan. 		Environmental Law 4DCA/1 Oct. 12, 2021
Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
A water quality variance regulation was not required to comply with the "highest attainable condition" from the outset, nor reach the base water quality standards by the end of the variance term. 		Environmental Law 9th Oct. 7, 2021
California River Watch v. City of Vacaville
A defendant can be held liable as a transporter of waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act even if it did not play a role in discarding the waste. 		Environmental Law 9th Sep. 30, 2021
Sierra Watch v. County of Placer
An Environmental Impact Report that inadequately provides information about the regional setting fails to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. 		Environmental Law 3DCA Sep. 24, 2021
Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay
Because a failure to provide information about pollutant discharge violations could increase the risk of harm to recreational users of a nearby river, plaintiffs had standing to bring suit. 		Environmental Law 9th Sep. 21, 2021
Food & Water Watch v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA's permit to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations must contain sufficient monitoring provisions to ensure wastewater discharge compliance. 		Environmental Law 9th Sep. 17, 2021
Association of Irritated Residents v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Because Environmental Protection Agency failed to provide reasoned explanation for approving state plan, rule was arbitrary and capricious. 		Environmental Law 9th Aug. 27, 2021
Native Village of Nuiqsut v. Bureau of Land Management
'Capable of repetition, yet evading review' exception to mootness did not apply where multitude of new circumstances rendered case moot. 		Environmental Law 9th Aug. 25, 2021
Save our Access v. Watershed Conservation Authority
Parking deficits do not affect project's environmental review unless it has impact 'on the environment.' 		Environmental Law 2DCA/8 Aug. 23, 2021
Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. County of Inyo
Adequate notice that California Environmental Quality Act exemption will be considered is required for issue exhaustion requirement to apply. 		Environmental Law 5DCA Aug. 19, 2021
Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Property that was adjacent to jurisdictional tributary and that, together with similarly situated wetlands complex, had significant nexus to Priest Lake, was regulable under Clean Water Act. 		Environmental Law 9th Aug. 17, 2021
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Conditions about where to dispose of dredged material was not an enforceable policy under the Coastal Zone Management Act. 		Environmental Law 9th Aug. 9, 2021
Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Agency action is not final when subsequent agency decision-making is necessary to create any legal or practical consequences. 		Environmental Law 9th Aug. 6, 2021
Bahr v. Regan
Environmental Protection Agency's conclusion that Arizona achieved statutory required reduction in ozone concentration by July 2018, in compliance with Clean Air Act, was valid. 		Environmental Law 9th Jul. 29, 2021
Whitewater Draw v. Mayorkas
Department of Homeland Security's Instruction Manual, which implements National Environmental Policy Act regulations, did not constitute 'final agency action' subject to review under Administrative Procedure Act. 		Environmental Law 9th Jul. 20, 2021
Save Lafayette Trees v. East Bay Regional Park Dist.
California Environmental Quality Act requires claims to be filed within 180-days from agencies public 'decision to carry out or approve' project. 		Environmental Law 1DCA/3 Jul. 6, 2021
Newtown Preservation Society v. County of El Dorado
Public comments and observations concerning residents' wildfire safety concerns did not constitute substantial evidence supporting fair argument that project may have significant effect on environment. 		Environmental Law 3DCA Jun. 21, 2021
Guam v. United States
Parties may seek contribution under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act only after settling CERCLA-specific liability. 		Environmental Law USSC May 25, 2021
Friends of Animals v. Haaland
Fish and Wildlife Services' pre-file notice rule was set aside because it runs against Endangered Species Act's requirement to rely only on information from citizens' petitions. 		Environmental Law 9th May 18, 2021
A Community Voice v. USEPA
Environmental Protection Agency's 2019 Rule was remanded because it did not set lead-based paint hazard standards based on health risks but instead focused on additional factors, contrary to Congress's directive. 		Environmental Law 9th May 17, 2021
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Regan
Environmental Protection Agency lacked power to deny 2007 petition asking EPA to prohibit foods containing insecticide chlorpyrifos, without first making the federally required safety findings. 		Environmental Law 9th Apr. 30, 2021
Stop Syar Expansion v. County of Napa
Trial court correctly ruled that appellant failed to exhaust its administrative remedies as to water quality issues. 		Environmental Law 1DCA/1 Apr. 27, 2021
United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, Inc.
Deliberative process privilege protects from disclosure draft biological opinions reflecting the Environmental Protection Agency's preliminary views on its proposed rule regarding endangered species. 		Environmental Law USSC Mar. 5, 2021
America Unites for Kids v. Rousseau
District court imposed punitive sanction under its inherent authority without providing criminal-type safeguards; thus, sanction was vacated under 'Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger.' 		Environmental Law 9th Jan. 25, 2021
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. San Francisco Bay
Plaintiff's project involved discharge of waste because it would lead to increased sedimentation in creek and obstruct flow of water, which would likely require periodic removal. 		Environmental Law 1DCA/4 Dec. 31, 2020
Amended Opinion: NAEC v. USDOI
National Environmental Policy Act provides reasonable notice that intended scope encompassed actual future lease sales. 		Environmental Law 9th Dec. 23, 2020
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.