Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S225562
|
People v. Superior Court (Smith)
Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 6603(j), district attorney was entitled to review treatment records supporting an updated or replacement evaluators' opinions about petitioner's suitability for designation as Sexually Violent Predator. |
Evidence |
|
M. Cuéllar | Dec. 14, 2018 |
C084180
|
People v. Burton
False statement juror instruction CALCRIM No. 362's reference to the 'charged crime' does not improperly suggest to juror that false statements demonstrate consciousness of guilt of most serious charged crime. |
Evidence |
|
E. Duarte | Dec. 5, 2018 |
C080488
|
People v. Phea
CALCRIM No. 1191 requires Evidence Code Section 1108 evidence be proved by a preponderance of the evidence, but does not reduce the prosecution's burden of proof as to any charged offenses. |
Evidence |
|
W. Murray | Nov. 30, 2018 |
E068344
|
Morgan v. Davidson
Under Evidence Code Section 1987(c), respondent was not required to provide the court with appellant's financial condition because appellant failed to comply with the notice to produce financial documents. |
Evidence |
|
D. Miller | Nov. 29, 2018 |
A152692
|
Modification: Hart v. Keenan Properties
Foreman's testimony regarding invoices purporting to show defendant supplied asbestos-cement pipes was inadmissible hearsay; wording on invoices were out of court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. |
Evidence |
|
Nov. 27, 2018 | |
A152692
|
Hart v. Keenan Properties
Foreman's testimony regarding invoices purporting to show defendant supplied asbestos-cement pipes was inadmissible hearsay; wording on invoices were out of court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. |
Evidence |
|
B. Jones | Nov. 21, 2018 |
F075085
|
Modification: People v. Randolph
Per 'Leahy' and 'Joehnk,' experienced law enforcement officers may present expert testimony as to field sobriety test and its implications. |
Evidence |
|
H. Levy | Nov. 16, 2018 |
E068490
|
People v. Garcia
Expert testimony on eyewitness identifications may be excluded when there is ample other evidence to substantially corroborate a witness' identification of a defendant. |
Evidence |
|
R. Fields | Nov. 5, 2018 |
F075085
|
People v. Randolph
Per 'Leahy' and 'Joehnk,' experienced law enforcement officers may present expert testimony as to field sobriety test and its implications. |
Evidence |
|
H. Levy | Oct. 24, 2018 |
D072019
|
People v. Megown
Defendant's uncharged prior acts of domestic violence were admissible under Evidence Code Section 1109 with respect to cohabitant's mother because cohabitant was present; thus, the circumstances of these crimes involved domestic violence. |
Evidence |
|
G. Nares | Oct. 15, 2018 |
E068135
|
People v. Gutierrez
Trial court did not err by allowing the prosecution to impeach defendant with evidence that he took a car without the owner's permission because it was conduct involving moral turpitude. |
Evidence |
|
M. Ramirez | Oct. 11, 2018 |
B284738
|
Shenouda v. Veterinary Med. Bd.
Appellant failed to identify the factual findings he was challenging and provided few citations to the administrative record to support his argument; thus he forfeited his assignment of error. |
Evidence |
|
T. Willhite | Sep. 25, 2018 |
B284725
|
Modification: People v. Banda
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 11361.8(b), in a petition for relief for persons with prior marijuana convictions, the court could consider evidence beyond the record of conviction. |
Evidence |
|
L. Zelon | Sep. 20, 2018 |
A149660
|
Coyne v. De Leo
A tenant who believes the landlord's invocation of the Ellis Act is phony may controvert the landlord's statement of intent by producing evidence of an alleged sham purchase contract and deed of trust. |
Evidence |
|
T. Bruiniers | Aug. 30, 2018 |
B284725
|
People v. Banda
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code 11361.8(b), in a petition for relief for persons with prior marijuana convictions, the court could consider evidence beyond the record of conviction. |
Evidence |
|
L. Zelon | Aug. 22, 2018 |
16-50227
|
U.S. v. Fomichev
'Sham marriage' exception improperly invoked to deny defendant's suppression motion based on marital communications privilege, where government placed wire on wife of suspected immigration fraudster. |
Evidence |
|
M. Christen | Aug. 9, 2018 |
d072015
|
Belfiore-Braman v. Rotenberg
Trial court does not err in precluding expert testimony on causation where it is 'too speculative' to present to the jury. |
Evidence |
|
R. Huffman | Jul. 16, 2018 |
C081267
|
People v. Williams
23-year-old conviction improperly admitted to prove defendant's intent in present-day murder case, where facts and defendant's motivation are meaningfully different in earlier case. |
Evidence |
|
E. Duarte | May 17, 2018 |
D072287
|
Apple Inc. v. Superior Court
Traditional admissibility of expert evidence standard applies to expert opinion evidence given in support of motion for class certification. |
Evidence |
|
T. O'Rourke | Jan. 31, 2018 |
A141377
|
Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply International, Inc.
Evidence supports ruling that class of dentists were not likely to be misled by sued-over directions on medical device. |
Evidence |
|
T. Reardon | Jan. 12, 2018 |
15-50538
|
U.S. v. Diaz
Expert testimony not impermissible legal opinion where expert's terms have no specialized legal meaning and do not 'instruct the jury on law or how to apply law.' |
Evidence |
|
M. Christen | Dec. 7, 2017 |
B269034
|
People v. Gallardo
It is prejudicial error to admit into evidence a co-defendant's statement made against their penal interest inculpating other co-defendants where close evidentiary questions otherwise exist. |
Evidence |
|
L. Zelon | Dec. 7, 2017 |
15-56062
|
City of Pomona v. SQM North America Corp.
In action alleging contamination of water supply, city wins new trial due to district court’s abuse of discretion with respect to both admission and exclusion of experts’ testimony. |
Evidence |
|
J. Wallace | Aug. 8, 2017 |
A149087
|
IAR Systems Software Inc. v. Superior Court (Shehayed)
Trial court errs in finding law firm representing crime victim is part of prosecution team for purposes of 'Brady' disclosure requirements. |
Evidence |
|
Jun. 6, 2017 | |
14-16321
|
Wendell v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
In case alleging defendants' drugs caused rare cancer, district court errs in excluding plaintiffs' expert testimony as unreliable. |
Evidence |
|
Jun. 4, 2017 | |
B272225
|
Behunin v. Superior Court (Schwab)
Communications between PR firm hired by lawyer for client to create website not privileged by attorney-client relationship, as website was not essential to lawyer's representation of client. |
Evidence |
|
Mar. 16, 2017 | |
14-10004
|
U.S. v. Lindsey
Evidence of broad industry standards pertaining to mortgage applications with false financial information may be introduced to challenge materiality of such information in wire fraud case. |
Evidence |
|
Feb. 28, 2017 | |
F069843
|
Sanchez v. Kern Emergency Medical Transportation Corp.
Summary judgment in favor of ambulance company affirmed, where plaintiff's expert witness' statements properly excluded and plaintiff cannot demonstrate triable issue of material fact. |
Evidence |
|
Feb. 17, 2017 | |
F069843
|
Sanchez v. Kern Emergency Medical Transportation Corp.
Summary judgment in favor of ambulance company affirmed, where plaintiff's expert witness' statements properly excluded and plaintiff cannot demonstrate triable issue of material fact. |
Evidence |
|
Feb. 6, 2017 | |
A142424
|
People v. Stamps
Expert testimony identifying drug through online comparison inadmissible hearsay under 'People v. Sanchez.' |
Evidence |
|
Oct. 31, 2016 |