Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A166577
|
Mueller v. Mueller
A confidentiality clause in an agreement that repeatedly and explicitly stated that it created no enforceable rights was not enforceable. |
Contracts, Family Law |
|
G. Burns | Jun. 4, 2024 |
A163185
|
Marriage of Dadashian
Because one spouse had exclusive access and information to couple's asset, trial court was required to apply *Margulis* to shift burden on managing spouse to account for missing asset. |
Family Law |
|
T. Stewart | May 30, 2024 |
B331994
|
G.G. v. G.S.
A domestic violence restraining order should be renewed in the absence of intentional violations of the initial order if the protected person had a reasonable apprehension of future abuse. |
Family Law |
|
H. Zukin | May 30, 2024 |
H049873
|
Bassi v. Bassi
Domestic violence restraining order was not struck even though some of anti-SLAPP movant's activity was protected because restraining order petition had requisite minimal merit. |
Anti-SLAPP, Family Law |
|
A. Danner | May 10, 2024 |
C097015
|
Br. C. v. Be. C.
Non-consensual recordings of husband's verbal abuse were admissible evidence in domestic violence restraining order proceedings because of statutory exception for recordings made by victims seeking such restraining orders. |
Family Law |
|
P. Krause | Apr. 8, 2024 |
A168081
|
N.M. v. W.K.
When a petitioner seeks a domestic violence restraining order, a respondent who has already responded to the petition is not entitled to a continuance of the hearing on the request "as a matter of course." |
Family Law |
|
A. Tucher | Mar. 22, 2024 |
D082723
|
In re P.L.
Father forfeited right to contest visitation order on appeal by failing to raise the issue before the juvenile court during repeated hearings that Father attended with counsel before that court. |
Family Law |
|
J. McConnell | Mar. 11, 2024 |
A157055
|
Modification: Marriage of Whitman
Trial court erred in holding community property responsible for civil penalty imposed due to spouse's illegal insider trading during the marriage. |
Family Law |
|
T. Stewart | Jan. 30, 2024 |
C091292
|
Marriage of Gilbert-Valencia and McEachen
Family court awarding 100 percent of net proceeds from quasi-marital property sale without finding of malice, fraud or oppression as to fiduciary duty breach, was an abuse of discretion. |
Family Law |
|
S. Mesiwala | Jan. 3, 2024 |
A157055
|
Marriage of Whitman
Trial court erred in holding community property responsible for civil penalty imposed due to spouse's illegal insider trading during the marriage. |
Family Law |
|
T. Stewart | Jan. 3, 2024 |
A166543
|
Modification: Marriage of Motiska and Ford
In marriage dissolution proceeding, sale of separate property to community property for $1 did not trigger Family Code Section 2640's reimbursement requirement. |
Family Law |
|
J. Streeter | Nov. 30, 2023 |
H050105
|
Marriage of V.S. & V.K.
Trial court did not err by concluding that the Hindu marriage ceremony was not legally binding on spouse who was not domiciled in India and did not submit to be bound by the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955. |
Family Law |
|
C. Lie | Nov. 16, 2023 |
A166543
|
Marriage of Motiska and Ford
In marriage dissolution proceeding, sale of separate property to community property for $1 did not trigger Family Code Section 2640's reimbursement requirement. |
Family Law |
|
J. Streeter | Nov. 10, 2023 |
D081250
|
Zachary H. v. Teri A.
Son's domestic violence restraining order against his mother was properly supported by testimony that she attempted to run him over with her car and threaten him via e-mail. |
Family Law |
|
W. Dato | Nov. 2, 2023 |
B322439
|
Jan F. v. Natalie F.
Trial court's application of wrong legal standard to determine abuse under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act warranted reversal and remand for evidentiary hearing. |
Family Law |
|
G. Weingart | Oct. 20, 2023 |
B313470
|
Parris J. v. Christopher U.
Domestic Violence Restraining Order did not require a reasonable, objective person standard and defendant's coercive control met the statutory requirements. |
Family Law |
|
B. Currey | Oct. 6, 2023 |
C095193
|
Marriage of Simonis
Spouse who commingles separate property funds after separation must be able to trace that separate property using case law-approved methods and provide evidence accordingly. |
Family Law |
|
H. Hull | Sep. 27, 2023 |
B323428
|
Marriage of C.D. and G.D.
Father had no right to object to Mother's educating decisions for their twin daughters because she had sole legal custody. |
Family Law |
|
H. Baltodano | Sep. 14, 2023 |
B318718
|
Marriage of C.D. and G.D.
Trial court was not required to order a child custody sexual abuse evaluation under Family Code Section 3118 to find that father sexually abused his twin daughters. |
Family Law |
|
H. Baltodano | Sep. 12, 2023 |
E080000
|
Hatley v. Southard
Trial court erred in denying wife's domestic violence restraining order by limiting its analysis of abuse to only physical violence or threats of violence. |
Family Law |
|
M. Raphael | Aug. 18, 2023 |
A162932
|
Marriage of Hearn
Fee award in marital dissolution was appropriate where there was a disparity in ability to retain counsel and one party could contribute to the legal representation of both parties. |
Family Law |
|
M. Miller | Aug. 14, 2023 |
A163975
|
Marriage of Cole
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that defendant's reported salary income was not determinative of his ability to pay child support in light of his assets and earning capacity. |
Family Law |
|
C. Fujisaki | Aug. 14, 2023 |
G060943
|
Last v. Superior Court (Last)
Premarital agreements that waive spousal support are presumed to be involuntarily executed absent an evidentiary showing and are not per se enforceable. |
Family Law |
|
M. Sanchez | Aug. 4, 2023 |
A166582
|
Vinson v. Kinsey
When assessing domestic violence restraining order requests, determining "threatening" behavior requires trial courts to consider the totality of circumstances, not just narrowly focusing on victim's behavior. |
Family Law |
|
T. Stewart | Jul. 28, 2023 |
A163825M
|
Modification: Swan v. Hatchett
Denial of request for modification of child support was reversed because the factual findings regarding evidence credibility in the statement of decision were not supported by substantial evidence. |
Family Law |
|
T. Brown | Jul. 20, 2023 |
A164713
|
Malinowski v. Martin
Code of Civil Procedure Section 533 did not provide exclusive means by which trial court in a Domestic Violence Protection Act action could modify a domestic violence temporary restraining order. |
Family Law |
|
C. Fujisaki | Jul. 18, 2023 |
G061528
|
Marriage of Willis v. Costa-Willis
The trial court erred in applying sua sponte the presumption against child custody to a party with a domestic violence restraining order to modify custody after issuing a restraining order. |
Family Law |
|
M. Sanchez | Jul. 18, 2023 |
A163825
|
Swan v. Hatchett
Denial of request for modification of child support was reversed because the factual findings regarding evidence credibility in the statement of decision were not supported by substantial evidence. |
Family Law |
|
T. Brown | Jun. 30, 2023 |
D080707
|
Michael M. v. Robin J.
Domestic violence restraining order should have been renewed based on the protected party's genuine, reasonable fear of future abuse despite lack of evidence of recent abuse. |
Family Law |
|
M. Buchanan | Jun. 5, 2023 |
H049755
|
People v. Coulthard
Abduction charges against British father were affirmed because he had no right to the custody of his eight-year-old daughter under the valid United Kingdom custody order. |
Family Law |
|
A. Danner | Apr. 21, 2023 |