For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Brach v. Newsom
Voluntary cessation exception to mootness did not apply to parents' suit claiming state officials violated federal law when they ordered schools to suspend in-person instruction due to COVID-19. 		Government 9th Jun. 16, 2022
Inter-Cooperative Exchange v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce
Government's search terms were not reasonably calculated to uncover all documents relevant to fishers' Freedom of Information Act request because the government's search terms were overly narrow. 		Government 9th Jun. 7, 2022
City of Oakland v. Dept. of Finance
Cooperation and funding agreements that merely function as agreements to agree do not constitute enforceable loans under the Dissolution Law. 		Government 3DCA Jun. 3, 2022
City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation Dist.
3:1 ratio between groundwater rates for municipal or industrial uses and agricultural uses rates did not pass constitutional muster. 		Government 2DCA/6 May 27, 2022
AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. City of Los Angeles
15-percent affordable housing requirement under the Community Redevelopment Law was rendered inoperative by the 2011 Dissolution Law, and the requirement did not survive as an "enforceable obligation." 		Government 2DCA/1 May 4, 2022
AIDS Healthcare Foundation et al. v. City of Los Angeles (CEQA)
The 15-percent affordable housing requirement is no longer required pursuant to the Dissolution Law and, even if it applies, it might not apply to individual project. 		Government 2DCA/1 May 2, 2022
Clark Bros., Inc. v. North Edwards Water District
Although government entities must pay interest on payments for public contracts not made within 30 days, late payment is not necessarily a breach of contract. 		Government 4DCA/1 Apr. 25, 2022
Rose v. County of San Benito
Trial court erred in considering inadmissible evidence to construe county board of supervisor's intent to confer lifetime healthcare benefits to retirees at the same rate as active employees. 		Government 6DCA Apr. 21, 2022
Kinney v. Superior Court (County of Kern)
Requested DUI arrestees' names were not "contemporaneous" under the Government Code because release of the names would not serve the purpose of preventing clandestine police activity. 		Government 5DCA Apr. 8, 2022
People v. Alorica Inc.
The People had the authority to subpoena records from a company collecting consumer debt on behalf of its clients to determine whether it was a debt collector under the Rosenthal Act. 		Government 4DCA/2 Apr. 7, 2022
Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach
City's ordinances restricting short-term rentals required commission approval under the California Coastal Act because the previously certified program made no distinction between short and long-term rentals. 		Government 2DCA/8 Apr. 7, 2022
Pacifica Firefighters Assn. v. City of Pacifica
A measure prescribing procedures in the event of an impasse in labor disputes with city firefighters was unenforceable as a usurpation of authority the legislature exclusively granted to city councils. 		Government 1DCA/2 Mar. 28, 2022
Flores v. Department of Transportation
Because plaintiffs filed a suit for injunctive relief, and injunctive relief is forward-looking, the revised version of the statute at issue applied rather than the version in place during the events in question. 		Government 2DCA/8 Mar. 25, 2022
Michaels v. State Personnel Board (Public Employees' Retirement System)
One-year period for voiding state civil service appointments begins on date position is offered to and accepted by the state employee. 		Government 3DCA Mar. 23, 2022
Schmier v. City of Berkeley
Condominium owner's complaint disputing the meaning of certain language of lien agreements with the city was not subject to the 90-day limitations period set forth in the Government Code. 		Government 1DCA/1 Mar. 23, 2022
FBI v. Fazaga
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not displace the state secrets privilege. 		Government USSC Mar. 7, 2022
Crenshaw Subway Coalition v. City of Los Angeles
A gentrification theory, used to challenge the approval of a development project, is not legally cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. 		Government 2DCA/2 Mar. 4, 2022
Coastal Act Protectors v. City of Los Angeles
A petition for writ of mandate challenging a zoning ordinance was subject to a 90-day limitations period because the alleged wrongdoing occurred at the time the ordinance was adopted. 		Government 2DCA/4 Feb. 28, 2022
Von Herrmann v. Superior Court (Management & Training Corp.)
The California Public Records Act applies to private entities that operate immigration detention facilities even when the operator does not directly contract with a city. 		Government 4DCA/1 Feb. 28, 2022
County of San Bernardino v. West Valley Water Dist.
Water district election was required to be held on statewide general election date, not statewide primary date when there was low voter turnout in previous years. 		Government 4DCA/2 Feb. 3, 2022
Andrews v. Metropolitan Transit System 1
Notice of rejection of claim for damages is defective and does not comply with Government Code Section 913(b) requirements if it does not include attorney advisement. 		Government 4DCA/1 Feb. 2, 2022
Starr v. Chaparro
Voter-adopted ordinance regarding mayoral term could not be amended except by voters so petition initiative seeking to amend that ordinance should have been presented to voters instead of adopted. 		Government 2DCA/6 Jan. 19, 2022
Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood v. City of Santa Cruz
A city did not violate its municipal code when it granted a planned development permit without requiring compliance with the code's slope modifications. 		Government 4DCA/1 Jan. 18, 2022
Biden v. Missouri
The Secretary of Health was authorized to require vaccination against COVID-19 in order for healthcare facilities to receive Medicare and Medicaid funding. 		Government USSC Jan. 18, 2022
Old East Davis Neighborhood Assn. v. City of Davis
Substantial evidence supported a city's approval of a proposed building project. 		Government 3DCA Jan. 13, 2022
Jobs & Housing Coalition v. City of Oakland
Enacting a measure on a majority vote despite statements in the ballot materials indicating that a supermajority would be needed did not violate due process. 		Government 1DCA/1 Jan. 4, 2022
Kalbers v. Volkswagen AG
Movant's intervention was timely when properly measured against when it became aware that its interests would no longer be protected by another party. 		Government 9th Dec. 29, 2021
Save Civita Because Sudberry Won't v. City of San Diego
Where city made clear the nature of a project's overall changes and stated that prior comments will not receive a response, city did not have to summarize revisions made to a previously circulated draft environmental impact report. 		Government 4DCA/1 Dec. 20, 2021
Fair Education Santa Barbara v. Santa Barbara Unified School District
Contracts for anti-bias training services were not void for failing to go through a public bidding process because the contracts were for "special services" exempt from the bidding process. 		Government 2DCA/6 Dec. 16, 2021
Wheeler v. Appellate Division (People)
Local ordinances imposing liability on landlords for allowing unlicensed commercial cannabis activity were not preempted by state law when the laws were not coextensive and landlords could comply with both laws. 		Government 2DCA/3 Dec. 16, 2021
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.