| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
19-99011
|
Catlin v. Broomfield
Federal habeas claim regarding ex parte communication was properly denied where it had previously been summarily denied by state supreme court and was not contrary to clearly established federal law. |
Habeas Corpus |
|
M. Smith | Dec. 26, 2024 |
|
18-99001
|
Waidla v. Davis
Since aggravation evidence outweighed totality of available mitigation evidence, habeas petitioner was not prejudiced by counsel's failure to present mitigating evidence and was not entitled to habeas relief. |
Habeas Corpus |
|
P. Curiam (9th Cir.) | Dec. 24, 2024 |
|
D084051
|
In re Lerke
No legal authority permitted an indefinite detention in county jail pending a transfer to a state hospital following the conclusion of competency proceedings in an underlying criminal case. |
Habeas Corpus |
|
M. Buchanan | Dec. 23, 2024 |
|
A171177
|
Nunez-Dosangos v. Superior Court (People)
Petitioner's pretrial detention was excessive in relation to the government's public safety goals and constituted impermissible punishment in violation of due process. |
Habeas Corpus, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Fujisaki | Dec. 12, 2024 |
|
20-99008
|
Atkins v. Bean
Nevada Supreme Court reasonably denied petitioner's claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present additional mitigating and social history evidence. |
Habeas Corpus |
|
C. Callahan | Dec. 3, 2024 |
|
E079255
|
People v. Thompson
Successive limited habeas corpus petition was the proper vehicle for capital defendant seeking resentencing relief under ameliorative changes to murder statutes due to the requirements of voter-approved Proposition 66. |
Habeas Corpus, Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
M. Ramirez | Oct. 29, 2024 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com